mirror of
https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor
synced 2025-08-22 01:57:43 +00:00
Merge utils: add support for multiple options and fstypes in mount rules
MR: https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/merge_requests/1693 Approved-by: John Johansen <john@jjmx.net> Merged-by: John Johansen <john@jjmx.net>
This commit is contained in:
commit
23deb55149
@ -32,11 +32,12 @@ flags_change_propagation = {
|
||||
'make-rslave'
|
||||
}
|
||||
# keep in sync with parser/mount.cc mnt_opts_table!
|
||||
# ordering is relevant here due to re.finditer - if r is present in the list before rw, then options will match r, not rw
|
||||
flags_keywords = list(flags_bind_mount) + list(flags_change_propagation) + [
|
||||
'ro', 'r', 'read-only', 'rw', 'w', 'suid', 'nosuid', 'dev', 'nodev', 'exec', 'noexec', 'sync', 'async', 'mand',
|
||||
'ro', 'read-only', 'rw', 'suid', 'nosuid', 'dev', 'nodev', 'exec', 'noexec', 'sync', 'async', 'mand',
|
||||
'nomand', 'dirsync', 'symfollow', 'nosymfollow', 'atime', 'noatime', 'diratime', 'nodiratime', 'move', 'M',
|
||||
'verbose', 'silent', 'loud', 'acl', 'noacl', 'relatime', 'norelatime', 'iversion', 'noiversion', 'strictatime',
|
||||
'nostrictatime', 'lazytime', 'nolazytime', 'user', 'nouser', '([A-Za-z0-9])',
|
||||
'nostrictatime', 'lazytime', 'nolazytime', 'user', 'nouser', 'r', 'w', '([A-Za-z0-9])',
|
||||
]
|
||||
join_valid_flags = '|'.join(flags_keywords)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -53,11 +54,11 @@ fs_type_pattern = r'\b(?P<fstype_or_vfstype>fstype|vfstype)\b\s*(?P<fstype_equal
|
||||
option_pattern = r'\s*(\boption(s?)\b\s*(?P<options_equals_or_in>=|in)\s*'\
|
||||
r'(?P<options>\(\s*(' + join_valid_flags + r')(' + sep + r'(' + join_valid_flags + r'))*\s*\)|' \
|
||||
r'(\s*' + join_valid_flags + r')'\
|
||||
r'))?'
|
||||
r'))'
|
||||
|
||||
# allow any order of fstype and options
|
||||
# Note: also matches if multiple fstype= or options= are given to keep the regex simpler
|
||||
mount_condition_pattern = rf'({fs_type_pattern}\s*|{option_pattern}\s*)*'
|
||||
mount_condition_pattern = rf'({fs_type_pattern}\s*|{option_pattern}?\s*)*'
|
||||
|
||||
# Source can either be
|
||||
# - A path : /foo
|
||||
@ -92,10 +93,9 @@ dest_fileglob_pattern = (
|
||||
RE_MOUNT_DETAILS = re.compile(r'^\s*' + mount_condition_pattern + rf'(\s+{source_fileglob_pattern})?' + rf'(\s+->\s+{dest_fileglob_pattern})?\s*' + r'$')
|
||||
RE_UMOUNT_DETAILS = re.compile(r'^\s*' + mount_condition_pattern + rf'(\s+{dest_fileglob_pattern})?\s*' + r'$')
|
||||
|
||||
# check if a rule contains multiple 'options' or 'fstype'
|
||||
# (not using option_pattern or fs_type_pattern here because a) it also matches an empty string, and b) using it twice would cause name conflicts)
|
||||
# check if a rule contains multiple 'fstype'
|
||||
# (not using fs_type_pattern here because a) it also matches an empty string, and b) using it twice would cause name conflicts)
|
||||
multi_param_template = r'\sPARAM\s*(=|\sin).*\sPARAM\s*(=|\sin)'
|
||||
RE_MOUNT_MULTIPLE_OPTIONS = re.compile(multi_param_template.replace('PARAM', 'options'))
|
||||
RE_MOUNT_MULTIPLE_FS_TYPE = re.compile(multi_param_template.replace('PARAM', 'v?fstype'))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -124,42 +124,55 @@ class MountRule(BaseRule):
|
||||
|
||||
self.operation = operation
|
||||
|
||||
if fstype == self.ALL or fstype[1] == self.ALL:
|
||||
self.all_fstype = True
|
||||
self.fstype = None
|
||||
self.is_fstype_equal = None
|
||||
else:
|
||||
self.all_fstype = False
|
||||
for it in fstype[1]:
|
||||
aare_len, unused = parse_aare(it, 0, 'fstype')
|
||||
if aare_len != len(it):
|
||||
raise AppArmorException(f'Invalid aare : {it}')
|
||||
self.fstype = fstype[1]
|
||||
self.is_fstype_equal = fstype[0]
|
||||
if not isinstance(fstype, list):
|
||||
fstype = [fstype]
|
||||
|
||||
self.options, self.all_options, unknown_items = check_and_split_list(options[1] if options != self.ALL else options, flags_keywords, self.ALL, type(self).__name__, 'options')
|
||||
if unknown_items:
|
||||
raise AppArmorException(_('Passed unknown options keyword to %s: %s') % (type(self).__name__, ' '.join(unknown_items)))
|
||||
self.is_options_equal = options[0] if not self.all_options else None
|
||||
# self.all_fstype will only be true if no fstypes are
|
||||
# specified, so it's fine to set it inside the loop
|
||||
self.fstype = []
|
||||
for fst in fstype:
|
||||
if fst == self.ALL or fst[1] == self.ALL:
|
||||
self.all_fstype = True
|
||||
fstype_values = None
|
||||
is_fstype_equal = None
|
||||
else:
|
||||
self.all_fstype = False
|
||||
for it in fst[1]:
|
||||
aare_len, unused = parse_aare(it, 0, 'fstype')
|
||||
if aare_len != len(it):
|
||||
raise AppArmorException(f'Invalid aare : {it}')
|
||||
fstype_values = fst[1]
|
||||
is_fstype_equal = fst[0]
|
||||
self.fstype.append(MountConditional('fstype', fstype_values, self.all_fstype, is_fstype_equal, 'aare'))
|
||||
|
||||
if not isinstance(options, list):
|
||||
options = [options]
|
||||
|
||||
# self.all_options will only be true if no options are
|
||||
# specified, so it's fine to set it inside the loop
|
||||
self.options = []
|
||||
for opts in options:
|
||||
opt_values, self.all_options, unknown_items = check_and_split_list(opts[1] if opts != self.ALL else opts, flags_keywords, self.ALL, type(self).__name__, 'options')
|
||||
if unknown_items:
|
||||
raise AppArmorException(_('Passed unknown options keyword to %s: %s') % (type(self).__name__, ' '.join(unknown_items)))
|
||||
is_options_equal = opts[0] if not self.all_options else None
|
||||
self.options.append(MountConditional('options', opt_values, self.all_options, is_options_equal, 'list'))
|
||||
|
||||
self.source, self.all_source = self._aare_or_all(source, 'source', is_path=False, log_event=log_event, empty_ok=True)
|
||||
self.dest, self.all_dest = self._aare_or_all(dest, 'dest', is_path=False, log_event=log_event)
|
||||
|
||||
if not self.all_fstype and self.is_fstype_equal not in ('=', 'in'):
|
||||
raise AppArmorBug(f'Invalid is_fstype_equal : {self.is_fstype_equal}')
|
||||
if not self.all_options and self.is_options_equal not in ('=', 'in'):
|
||||
raise AppArmorBug(f'Invalid is_options_equal : {self.is_options_equal}')
|
||||
if self.operation != 'mount' and not self.all_source:
|
||||
raise AppArmorException(f'Operation {self.operation} cannot have a source')
|
||||
|
||||
if self.operation == 'mount' and not self.all_options and flags_change_propagation & self.options != set():
|
||||
if not (self.all_source or self.all_dest):
|
||||
raise AppArmorException(f'Operation {flags_change_propagation & self.options} cannot specify a source. Source = {self.source}')
|
||||
elif not self.all_fstype:
|
||||
raise AppArmorException(f'Operation {flags_change_propagation & self.options} cannot specify a fstype. Fstype = {self.fstype}')
|
||||
for opt_cond in self.options:
|
||||
if self.operation == 'mount' and not self.all_options and flags_change_propagation & opt_cond.values != set():
|
||||
if not (self.all_source or self.all_dest):
|
||||
raise AppArmorException(f'Operation {flags_change_propagation & opt_cond.values} cannot specify a source. Source = {self.source}')
|
||||
elif not self.all_fstype:
|
||||
raise AppArmorException(f'Operation {flags_change_propagation & opt_cond.values} cannot specify a fstype. Fstype = {self.fstype}')
|
||||
|
||||
if self.operation == 'mount' and not self.all_options and flags_bind_mount & self.options != set() and not self.all_fstype:
|
||||
raise AppArmorException(f'Bind mount rules cannot specify a fstype. Fstype = {self.fstype}')
|
||||
if self.operation == 'mount' and not self.all_options and flags_bind_mount & opt_cond.values != set() and not self.all_fstype:
|
||||
raise AppArmorException(f'Bind mount rules cannot specify a fstype. Fstype = {self.fstype}')
|
||||
|
||||
self.can_glob = not self.all_source and not self.all_dest and not self.all_options
|
||||
|
||||
@ -184,29 +197,19 @@ class MountRule(BaseRule):
|
||||
if not r:
|
||||
raise AppArmorException('Can\'t parse mount rule ' + raw_rule)
|
||||
|
||||
fstype = (None, cls.ALL)
|
||||
if r['fstype'] is not None:
|
||||
# mount rules with multiple 'fstype' are not supported by the tools yet, and when writing them, only the last 'fstype' would survive.
|
||||
# Therefore raise an exception when parsing such a rule to prevent breaking the rule.
|
||||
if RE_MOUNT_MULTIPLE_FS_TYPE.search(raw_rule):
|
||||
raise AppArmorException("mount rules with multiple 'fstype' are not supported by the tools")
|
||||
|
||||
is_fstype_equal = r['fstype_equals_or_in']
|
||||
fstype = parse_aare_list(strip_parenthesis(r['fstype']), 'fstype')
|
||||
else:
|
||||
is_fstype_equal = None
|
||||
fstype = cls.ALL
|
||||
fstype = []
|
||||
for m in re.finditer(fs_type_pattern, rule_details):
|
||||
fst = parse_aare_list(strip_parenthesis(m.group('fstype')), 'fstype')
|
||||
fstype.append((m.group('fstype_equals_or_in'), fst))
|
||||
|
||||
opts = (None, cls.ALL)
|
||||
if r['options'] is not None:
|
||||
# mount rules with multiple 'options' are not supported by the tools yet, and when writing them, only the last 'options' would survive.
|
||||
# Therefore raise an exception when parsing such a rule to prevent breaking the rule.
|
||||
if RE_MOUNT_MULTIPLE_OPTIONS.search(raw_rule):
|
||||
raise AppArmorException("mount rules with multiple 'options' are not supported by the tools")
|
||||
|
||||
is_options_equal = r['options_equals_or_in']
|
||||
options = strip_parenthesis(r['options']).replace(',', ' ').split()
|
||||
else:
|
||||
is_options_equal = None
|
||||
options = cls.ALL
|
||||
opts = []
|
||||
for m in re.finditer(option_pattern, rule_details):
|
||||
options = strip_parenthesis(m.group('options')).replace(',', ' ').split()
|
||||
opts.append((m.group('options_equals_or_in'), options))
|
||||
|
||||
if operation == 'mount' and r['source_file'] is not None: # Umount cannot have a source
|
||||
source = strip_quotes(r['source_file'])
|
||||
@ -219,22 +222,25 @@ class MountRule(BaseRule):
|
||||
dest = cls.ALL
|
||||
|
||||
else:
|
||||
is_fstype_equal = None
|
||||
is_options_equal = None
|
||||
fstype = cls.ALL
|
||||
options = cls.ALL
|
||||
opts = (None, cls.ALL)
|
||||
fstype = (None, cls.ALL)
|
||||
source = cls.ALL
|
||||
dest = cls.ALL
|
||||
|
||||
return cls(operation=operation, fstype=(is_fstype_equal, fstype), options=(is_options_equal, options),
|
||||
return cls(operation=operation, fstype=fstype, options=opts,
|
||||
source=source, dest=dest, audit=audit, deny=deny, allow_keyword=allow_keyword, comment=comment,
|
||||
priority=priority)
|
||||
|
||||
def get_clean(self, depth=0):
|
||||
space = ' ' * depth
|
||||
|
||||
fstype = ' fstype%s(%s)' % (wrap_in_with_spaces(self.is_fstype_equal), ', '.join(sorted(self.fstype))) if not self.all_fstype else ''
|
||||
options = ' options%s(%s)' % (wrap_in_with_spaces(self.is_options_equal), ', '.join(sorted(self.options))) if not self.all_options else ''
|
||||
fstype = ''
|
||||
for fst in self.fstype:
|
||||
fstype += fst.get_clean()
|
||||
|
||||
options = ''
|
||||
for opt in self.options:
|
||||
options += opt.get_clean()
|
||||
|
||||
source = ''
|
||||
dest = ''
|
||||
@ -263,23 +269,20 @@ class MountRule(BaseRule):
|
||||
self.comment,
|
||||
))
|
||||
|
||||
def _is_cond_list_covered(self, conds, other_conds):
|
||||
'''Checks if all conds in 'other_conds' are covered by at
|
||||
least one cond in 'conds'.'''
|
||||
return all(
|
||||
any(cond.is_covered(other_cond) for cond in conds)
|
||||
for other_cond in other_conds
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _is_covered_localvars(self, other_rule):
|
||||
if self.operation != other_rule.operation:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
if self.is_fstype_equal != other_rule.is_fstype_equal:
|
||||
if not self._is_cond_list_covered(self.fstype, other_rule.fstype):
|
||||
return False
|
||||
if self.is_options_equal != other_rule.is_options_equal:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
for o_it in other_rule.fstype or []:
|
||||
found = False
|
||||
for s_it in self.fstype or []:
|
||||
if self._is_covered_aare(AARE(s_it, False), self.all_fstype, AARE(o_it, False), other_rule.all_fstype, 'fstype'):
|
||||
found = True
|
||||
|
||||
if not found:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
if not self._is_covered_list(self.options, self.all_options, other_rule.options, other_rule.all_options, 'options'):
|
||||
if not self._is_cond_list_covered(self.options, other_rule.options):
|
||||
return False
|
||||
if not self._is_covered_aare(self.source, self.all_source, other_rule.source, other_rule.all_source, 'source'):
|
||||
return False
|
||||
@ -291,10 +294,6 @@ class MountRule(BaseRule):
|
||||
def _is_equal_localvars(self, rule_obj, strict):
|
||||
if self.operation != rule_obj.operation:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
if self.is_fstype_equal != rule_obj.is_fstype_equal:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
if self.is_options_equal != rule_obj.is_options_equal:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
if self.fstype != rule_obj.fstype or self.options != rule_obj.options:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
if not self._is_equal_aare(self.source, self.all_source, rule_obj.source, rule_obj.all_source, 'source'):
|
||||
@ -339,21 +338,29 @@ class MountRule(BaseRule):
|
||||
self.source = self.ALL
|
||||
|
||||
else:
|
||||
self.options = self.ALL
|
||||
self.options = [MountConditional('options', self.ALL, True, None)]
|
||||
self.all_options = True
|
||||
self.raw_rule = None
|
||||
|
||||
def _logprof_header_localvars(self):
|
||||
operation = self.operation
|
||||
fstype = logprof_value_or_all(self.fstype, self.all_fstype)
|
||||
options = logprof_value_or_all(self.options, self.all_options)
|
||||
|
||||
fstype_output = ()
|
||||
for fst in self.fstype:
|
||||
fstype = logprof_value_or_all(fst.values, fst.all_values)
|
||||
fstype_output = fstype_output + (_('Fstype'), (fst.operator, fstype) if fstype != 'ALL' else fstype)
|
||||
|
||||
opts_output = ()
|
||||
for opt in self.options:
|
||||
options = logprof_value_or_all(opt.values, opt.all_values)
|
||||
opts_output = opts_output + (_('Options'), (opt.operator, options) if options != 'ALL' else options)
|
||||
source = logprof_value_or_all(self.source, self.all_source)
|
||||
dest = logprof_value_or_all(self.dest, self.all_dest)
|
||||
|
||||
return (
|
||||
_('Operation'), operation,
|
||||
_('Fstype'), (self.is_fstype_equal, fstype) if fstype != 'ALL' else fstype,
|
||||
_('Options'), (self.is_options_equal, options) if options != 'ALL' else options,
|
||||
*fstype_output,
|
||||
*opts_output,
|
||||
_('Source'), source,
|
||||
_('Destination'), dest,
|
||||
|
||||
@ -402,3 +409,72 @@ def wrap_in_with_spaces(value):
|
||||
value = ' in '
|
||||
|
||||
return value
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class MountConditional(MountRule):
|
||||
'''Class to handle and store mount conditionals'''
|
||||
def __init__(self, name, values, all_values, operator, cond_type=None):
|
||||
self.name = name
|
||||
self.values = values
|
||||
self.all_values = all_values
|
||||
self.operator = operator
|
||||
self.cond_type = cond_type
|
||||
self.raw_rule = '' # needed so __repr__ calls get_clean
|
||||
|
||||
if not self.all_values and self.operator not in ('=', 'in'):
|
||||
raise AppArmorBug(f'Invalid operator for {self.name}: {self.operator}')
|
||||
|
||||
def __eq__(self, other: object) -> bool:
|
||||
if not isinstance(other, MountConditional):
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
if self.all_values != other.all_values:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
if self.cond_type != other.cond_type:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
if self.values != other.values:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
if self.operator != other.operator:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
return True
|
||||
|
||||
def is_covered(self, other: object) -> bool:
|
||||
if not isinstance(other, MountConditional):
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
if self.name != other.name:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
if self.all_values:
|
||||
return True
|
||||
|
||||
if other.all_values:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
if self.cond_type == 'list':
|
||||
if not self._is_covered_list(self.values, self.all_values, other.values, other.all_values, self.name):
|
||||
return False
|
||||
elif self.cond_type == 'aare': # list of aares - all values in other must be at least once in self.values
|
||||
if not all(any(self._is_covered_aare(AARE(value, False), self.all_values,
|
||||
AARE(other_value, False), other.all_values, self.name)
|
||||
for value in self.values)
|
||||
for other_value in other.values):
|
||||
return False
|
||||
else:
|
||||
raise AppArmorBug('Type should only be empty if ALL is true')
|
||||
|
||||
if self.operator == other.operator:
|
||||
return True
|
||||
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
def get_clean(self, depth=0) -> str:
|
||||
conditional = ''
|
||||
if not self.all_values:
|
||||
conditional += ' %s%s(%s)' % (self.name, wrap_in_with_spaces(self.operator), ', '.join(sorted(self.values)))
|
||||
|
||||
return conditional
|
||||
|
@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ from common_test import AATest, setup_all_loops
|
||||
from apparmor.common import AppArmorException, AppArmorBug
|
||||
from apparmor.translations import init_translation
|
||||
|
||||
from apparmor.rule.mount import MountRule
|
||||
from apparmor.rule.mount import MountRule, MountConditional
|
||||
|
||||
_ = init_translation()
|
||||
|
||||
@ -61,6 +61,33 @@ class MountTestParse(AATest):
|
||||
False, False, False, '')), # noqa: E127
|
||||
('mount options=(runbindable, rw) -> /,', MountRule('mount', MountRule.ALL, ('=', ['runbindable', 'rw']), MountRule.ALL, '/', False, False, False, '')),
|
||||
('mount "" -> /,', MountRule('mount', MountRule.ALL, MountRule.ALL, '', '/', False, False, False, '')),
|
||||
|
||||
('mount options=(ro) options=(rw) fstype=ext4 -> /dest,', MountRule('mount', ('=', ['ext4']), [('=', ('ro')), ('=', ('rw'))], # noqa: E127
|
||||
MountRule.ALL, '/dest', False, False, False, '')), # noqa: E127
|
||||
('mount options=(ro) fstype=ext4 options=(rw) /src -> /dest,', MountRule('mount', ('=', ['ext4']), [('=', ('ro')), ('=', ('rw'))], # noqa: E127
|
||||
'/src', '/dest', False, False, False, '')), # noqa: E127
|
||||
('mount options in (ro) options in (rw) fstype=ext4 -> /dest,', MountRule('mount', ('=', ['ext4']), [('in', ('ro')), ('in', ('rw'))], # noqa: E127
|
||||
MountRule.ALL, '/dest', False, False, False, '')), # noqa: E127
|
||||
('mount options in (ro) fstype=ext4 options in (rw) -> /dest,', MountRule('mount', ('=', ['ext4']), [('in', ('ro')), ('in', ('rw'))], # noqa: E127
|
||||
MountRule.ALL, '/dest', False, False, False, '')), # noqa: E127
|
||||
('mount options = (ro) options in (rw) fstype=ext4 -> /dest,', MountRule('mount', ('=', ['ext4']), [('=', ('ro')), ('in', ('rw'))], # noqa: E127
|
||||
MountRule.ALL, '/dest', False, False, False, '')), # noqa: E127
|
||||
('mount options = (ro) fstype=ext4 options in (rw) -> /dest,', MountRule('mount', ('=', ['ext4']), [('=', ('ro')), ('in', ('rw'))], # noqa: E127
|
||||
MountRule.ALL, '/dest', False, False, False, '')), # noqa: E127
|
||||
|
||||
('mount options=(ro) fstype=ext3 fstype=ext4 -> /dest,', MountRule('mount', [('=', ['ext3']), ('=', ['ext4'])],
|
||||
('=', ('ro')), MountRule.ALL, '/dest', False, False, False, '')), # noqa: E127
|
||||
('mount fstype=ext3 options=(ro) fstype=ext4 src -> /dest,', MountRule('mount', [('=', ['ext3']), ('=', ['ext4'])],
|
||||
('=', ('ro')), 'src', '/dest', False, False, False, '')), # noqa: E127
|
||||
('mount options=(ro) fstype in (ext3) fstype in (ext4) -> /dest,', MountRule('mount', [('in', ['ext3']), ('in', ['ext4'])],
|
||||
('=', ('ro')), MountRule.ALL, '/dest', False, False, False, '')), # noqa: E127
|
||||
('mount fstype in (ext3) options=(ro) fstype in (ext4) -> /dest,', MountRule('mount', [('in', ['ext3']), ('in', ['ext4'])],
|
||||
('=', ('ro')), MountRule.ALL, '/dest', False, False, False, '')), # noqa: E127
|
||||
('mount options=(ro) fstype in (ext3) fstype=(ext4) -> /dest,', MountRule('mount', [('in', ['ext3']), ('=', ['ext4'])],
|
||||
('=', ('ro')), MountRule.ALL, '/dest', False, False, False, '')), # noqa: E127
|
||||
('mount fstype = (ext3) options=(ro) fstype in ext4 -> /dest,', MountRule('mount', [('=', ['ext3']), ('in', ['ext4'])],
|
||||
('=', ('ro')), MountRule.ALL, '/dest', False, False, False, '')), # noqa: E127
|
||||
|
||||
('umount,', MountRule('umount', MountRule.ALL, MountRule.ALL, MountRule.ALL, MountRule.ALL, False, False, False, '')),
|
||||
('umount fstype=ext3,', MountRule('umount', ('=', ['ext3']), MountRule.ALL, MountRule.ALL, MountRule.ALL, False, False, False, '')),
|
||||
('umount /a,', MountRule('umount', MountRule.ALL, MountRule.ALL, MountRule.ALL, '/a', False, False, False, '')),
|
||||
@ -95,22 +122,6 @@ class MountTestParseInvalid(AATest):
|
||||
('mount options=(),', AppArmorException),
|
||||
('mount option=(invalid),', AppArmorException),
|
||||
('mount option=(ext3ext4),', AppArmorException),
|
||||
|
||||
# mount rules with multiple 'options' are not supported by the tools yet, and when writing them, only the last 'options' would survive. Therefore MountRule intentionally raises an exception when parsing such a rule.
|
||||
('mount options=(ro) options=(rw) fstype=ext4 -> /destination,', AppArmorException),
|
||||
('mount options=(ro) fstype=ext4 options=(rw) -> /destination,', AppArmorException),
|
||||
('mount options in (ro) options in (rw) fstype=ext4 -> /destination,', AppArmorException),
|
||||
('mount options in (ro) fstype=ext4 options in (rw) -> /destination,', AppArmorException),
|
||||
('mount options = (ro) options in (rw) fstype=ext4 -> /destination,', AppArmorException),
|
||||
('mount options = (ro) fstype=ext4 options in (rw) -> /destination,', AppArmorException),
|
||||
|
||||
# mount rules with multiple 'fstype' are not supported by the tools yet, and when writing them, only the last 'fstype' would survive. Therefore MountRule intentionally raises an exception when parsing such a rule.
|
||||
('mount options=(ro) fstype=ext3 fstype=ext4 -> /destination,', AppArmorException),
|
||||
('mount fstype=ext3 options=(ro) fstype=ext4 -> /destination,', AppArmorException),
|
||||
('mount options=(ro) fstype in (ext3) fstype in (ext4) -> /destination,', AppArmorException),
|
||||
('mount fstype in (ext3) options=(ro) fstype in (ext4) -> /destination,', AppArmorException),
|
||||
('mount options=(ro) fstype in (ext3) fstype=(ext4) -> /destination,', AppArmorException),
|
||||
('mount fstype in (ext3) options=(ro) fstype=ext4 -> /destination,', AppArmorException),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _run_test(self, rawrule, expected):
|
||||
@ -192,6 +203,12 @@ class MountTestParseInvalid(AATest):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(AppArmorException):
|
||||
MountRule('mount', ('=', ('ext4')), ('=', ('bind')), MountRule.ALL, '/foo')
|
||||
|
||||
def test_invalid_cond_type(self):
|
||||
# cond_type cannot be None if all_values is False
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(AppArmorBug):
|
||||
obj = MountConditional('name', [], False, '=', cond_type=None)
|
||||
obj.is_covered(obj)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class MountTestGlob(AATest):
|
||||
def test_glob(self):
|
||||
@ -264,8 +281,9 @@ class MountIsCoveredTest(AATest):
|
||||
def test_is_covered(self):
|
||||
obj = MountRule('mount', ('=', ('ext3', 'ext4')), ('=', ('ro')), '/foo/b*', '/b*')
|
||||
tests = [
|
||||
('mount', ('=', ['ext3', 'ext4']), ('=', ('ro')), '/foo/b', '/bar'),
|
||||
('mount', ('=', ['ext3', 'ext4']), ('=', ('ro')), '/foo/bar', '/b')
|
||||
('mount', ('=', ['ext3', 'ext4']), ('=', ('ro')), '/foo/b', '/bar'),
|
||||
('mount', ('=', ['ext3', 'ext4']), ('=', ('ro')), '/foo/bar', '/b'),
|
||||
('mount', ('=', ['ext3', 'ext4']), [('=', ('ro'))], '/foo/bar', '/b')
|
||||
]
|
||||
for test in tests:
|
||||
self.assertTrue(obj.is_covered(MountRule(*test)))
|
||||
@ -296,19 +314,73 @@ class MountIsCoveredTest(AATest):
|
||||
self.assertTrue(obj.is_covered(MountRule(*test)))
|
||||
self.assertFalse(obj.is_equal(MountRule(*test)))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_is_covered_options_diff_operator(self):
|
||||
obj = MountRule('mount', ('=', ('ext3', 'ext4')), ('=', ('ro')), '/foo/b*', '/b*')
|
||||
test_obj = MountRule('mount', ('=', ('ext3', 'ext4')), ('in', ('ro')), '/foo/b*', '/b*')
|
||||
self.assertFalse(obj.is_covered(test_obj), '\n' + test_obj.get_clean() + '\n should not be covered by\n' + obj.get_clean())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_is_covered_options_all(self):
|
||||
obj = MountRule('mount', ('=', ('ext3', 'ext4')), MountRule.ALL, '/foo/b*', '/b*')
|
||||
test_obj = MountRule('mount', ('=', ('ext3', 'ext4')), ('in', ('ro')), '/foo/b*', '/b*')
|
||||
self.assertTrue(obj.is_covered(test_obj), '\n' + test_obj.get_clean() + '\n should be covered by\n' + obj.get_clean())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_is_covered_options_true(self):
|
||||
obj = MountRule('mount', ('=', ('ext3', 'ext4')), [('in', ('ro')), ('=', ('rw', 'noexec')), ('in', ('ro', 'nosuid'))], '/foo/b*', '/b*')
|
||||
test_obj = MountRule('mount', ('=', ('ext3', 'ext4')), [('=', ('rw', 'noexec')), ('in', ('ro', 'nosuid'))], '/foo/b*', '/b*')
|
||||
self.assertTrue(obj.is_covered(test_obj), '\n' + test_obj.get_clean() + '\n should be covered by\n' + obj.get_clean())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_is_equal_options_diff_operator(self):
|
||||
obj = MountRule('mount', ('=', ('ext3', 'ext4')), ('=', ('ro')), '/foo/b*', '/b*')
|
||||
test_obj = MountRule('mount', ('=', ('ext3', 'ext4')), ('in', ('ro')), '/foo/b*', '/b*')
|
||||
self.assertFalse(obj.is_equal(test_obj, True), '\n' + test_obj.get_clean() + '\n should not be equal to\n' + obj.get_clean())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_is_equal_options_diff_options(self):
|
||||
obj = MountRule('mount', ('=', ('ext3', 'ext4')), [('in', ('ro')), ('=', ('nosuid', 'noexec'))], '/foo/b*', '/b*')
|
||||
test_obj = MountRule('mount', ('=', ('ext3', 'ext4')), ('in', ('ro')), '/foo/b*', '/b*')
|
||||
self.assertFalse(obj.is_equal(test_obj, True), '\n' + test_obj.get_clean() + '\n should not be equal to\n' + obj.get_clean())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_is_equal_options_true(self):
|
||||
obj = MountRule('mount', ('=', ('ext3', 'ext4')), [('in', ('ro')), ('=', ('nosuid', 'noexec'))], '/foo/b*', '/b*')
|
||||
test_obj = MountRule('mount', ('=', ('ext3', 'ext4')), [('in', ('ro')), ('=', ('nosuid', 'noexec'))], '/foo/b*', '/b*')
|
||||
self.assertTrue(obj.is_equal(test_obj, True), '\n' + test_obj.get_clean() + '\n should be equal to\n' + obj.get_clean())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_eq_cond_diff_type(self):
|
||||
obj = MountConditional('options', ['ro'], False, 'in', 'aare')
|
||||
test_obj = MountConditional('options', ['ro'], False, 'in', 'list')
|
||||
self.assertFalse(test_obj == obj, 'cond_types should be different')
|
||||
|
||||
def test_eq_cond_diff_instance(self):
|
||||
obj = MountRule('mount', ('=', ('ext3', 'ext4')), [('in', ('ro')), ('=', ('nosuid', 'noexec'))], '/foo/b*', '/b*')
|
||||
test_obj = MountConditional('options', ['ro'], False, 'in', 'list')
|
||||
self.assertFalse(test_obj == obj, 'Incompatible comparison')
|
||||
|
||||
def test_covered_cond_diff_instance(self):
|
||||
obj = MountRule('mount', ('=', ('ext3', 'ext4')), [('in', ('ro')), ('=', ('nosuid', 'noexec'))], '/foo/b*', '/b*')
|
||||
test_obj = MountConditional('options', ['ro'], False, 'in', 'list')
|
||||
self.assertFalse(test_obj.is_covered(obj), 'Incompatible comparison')
|
||||
|
||||
def test_covered_cond_diff_name(self):
|
||||
obj = MountConditional('foo', ['ro'], False, '=', 'list')
|
||||
test_obj = MountConditional('options', ['ro'], False, '=', 'list')
|
||||
self.assertFalse(test_obj.is_covered(obj), 'Incompatible comparison')
|
||||
|
||||
def test_is_notcovered(self):
|
||||
obj = MountRule('mount', ('=', ['ext3', 'ext4']), ('=', ('ro')), '/foo/b*', '/b*')
|
||||
tests = [
|
||||
('mount', ('in', ['ext3', 'ext4']), ('=', ('ro')), '/foo/bar', '/bar'),
|
||||
('mount', ('=', ['procfs', 'ext4']), ('=', ('ro')), '/foo/bar', '/bar'),
|
||||
('mount', ('=', ['ext3']), ('=', ('rw')), '/foo/bar', '/bar'),
|
||||
('mount', ('in', ['ext3', 'ext4']), ('=', ('ro')), '/foo/bar', '/bar'),
|
||||
('mount', ('=', ['procfs', 'ext4']), ('=', ('ro')), '/foo/bar', '/bar'),
|
||||
('mount', ('=', ['ext3']), ('=', ('rw')), '/foo/bar', '/bar'),
|
||||
('mount', ('=', ['ext3', 'ext4']), MountRule.ALL, '/foo/b*', '/bar'),
|
||||
('mount', MountRule.ALL, ('=', ('ro')), '/foo/b*', '/bar'),
|
||||
('mount', ('=', ['ext3', 'ext4']), ('=', ('ro')), '/invalid/bar', '/bar'),
|
||||
('mount', MountRule.ALL, ('=', ('ro')), '/foo/b*', '/bar'),
|
||||
('mount', ('=', ['ext3', 'ext4']), ('=', ('ro')), '/invalid/bar', '/bar'),
|
||||
('umount', MountRule.ALL, MountRule.ALL, MountRule.ALL, '/bar'),
|
||||
('remount', MountRule.ALL, MountRule.ALL, MountRule.ALL, '/bar'),
|
||||
('mount', ('=', ['ext3', 'ext4']), ('=', ('ro')), 'tmpfs', '/bar'),
|
||||
('mount', ('=', ['ext3', 'ext4']), ('=', ('ro')), '/foo/b*', '/invalid'),
|
||||
('mount', ('=', ['ext3', 'ext4']), ('=', ('ro')), 'tmpfs', '/bar'),
|
||||
('mount', ('=', ['ext3', 'ext4']), ('=', ('ro')), '/foo/b*', '/invalid'),
|
||||
('mount', ('=', ['ext3']), ('in', ('ro')), '/foo/bar', '/bar'),
|
||||
('mount', ('=', ['ext3']), [('in', ('ro')), ('=', ('rw'))], '/foo/bar', '/bar'),
|
||||
('mount', ('=', ['ext3']), [('=', ('ro')), ('in', ('rw'))], '/foo/bar', '/bar'),
|
||||
('mount', ('=', ['ext3']), [('=', ('ro', 'nosuid')), ('in', ('rw'))], '/foo/bar', '/bar'),
|
||||
]
|
||||
for test in tests:
|
||||
self.assertFalse(obj.is_covered(MountRule(*test)))
|
||||
|
@ -440,11 +440,6 @@ syntax_failure = (
|
||||
'file/priority/ok_quoted_4.sd', # quoted string including \"
|
||||
'file/priority/ok_embedded_spaces_4.sd', # \-escaped space
|
||||
|
||||
# mount rules with multiple 'options' or 'fstype' are not supported by the tools yet, and when writing them, only the last 'options'/'fstype' would survive.
|
||||
# Therefore MountRule intentionally raises an exception when parsing such a rule.
|
||||
'mount/ok_opt_87.sd', # multiple options
|
||||
'mount/ok_opt_88.sd', # multiple fstype
|
||||
|
||||
# misc
|
||||
'vars/vars_dbus_12.sd', # AARE starting with {{ are not handled
|
||||
'vars/vars_simple_assignment_12.sd', # Redefining existing variable @{BAR} ('\' not handled)
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user