In UnixRule (and probably also in other rules that use
print_dict_values()` and `initialize_cond_dict()`), the handling of
peers with a value that is quoted and/or needs to be quoted was broken
because
- quotes didn't get stripped in `initialize_cond_dict()`
- `print_dict_values()` didn't use `quote_if_needed()`
Note: print_dict_values also handles integers (like network ports).
Convert them to a string so that `if ' ' in data` in `quote_if_needed()`
doesn't explode.
Also enable the test that uncovered this bug.
`?` is a valid AARE char, add it to the regexes that match the AARE.
Also add some tests to ensure this is really fixed, and make the error
output of the tests more useful/verbose.
Note: One of the added tests (with a space in the peer name) uncovered a
bug in quote handling. This will be fixed in the next commit.
Fixes: https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues/404
... and tests for it.
This replaces the old code that just stores the full rule as text.
We also get rid of the old ['allow'] and ['deny'] items in
ProfileStorage, the handling of old write functions, and the last usage
of _Raw_Rule (and therefore _Raw_Rule itsself).
Also delete the old test-pivot_root_parse.py which relied on the ancient
code, and even used a wrong syntax in its test rules.
Oh, and aa-logprof can now ask about pivot_root events.
See the individual commits for details.
MR: https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/merge_requests/1232
Approved-by: Georgia Garcia <georgia.garcia@canonical.com>
Merged-by: Christian Boltz <apparmor@cboltz.de>
Mount Rules with options in { remount, [make-] { [r]unbindable, [r]shared, [r]private, and [r]slave }} do not support specifying a source. This commit aligns utils implementation to apparmor_parser's, which prohibits having a both source and a destination simultaneously, instad of just prohibiting source.
Therefore, both `mount options=(unbindable) /a,` and `mount options=(unbindable) -> /a,` are now supported (and equivalent for apparmor_parser). However, `mount options=(unbindable) /a -> /b,` is invalid.
For the same reason, specifying a fstype in these cases is also prohibited.
Similarly, we prohibit to specify a fstype for bind mount rules.
Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2065685
Signed-off-by: Maxime Bélair <maxime.belair@canonical.com>
... for handling pivot_root rules.
This replaces the old code that just stores the full rule as text.
We also get rid of the old ['allow'] and ['deny'] items in
ProfileStorage, the handling of old write functions, and the last usage
of _Raw_Rule (and therefore _Raw_Rule itsself).
Also delete the old test-pivot_root_parse.py which relied on the ancient
code, and even used a wrong syntax in its test rules.
audit.log entries for mount events don't always include `class=mount`,
but can still be the base for mount rules.
Change logparser.py to also consider `operation=mount` as a mount event.
Actually we already had such a log and profile in our collection
(testcase_mount_01), but since it existed years before MountRule was
implemented, it was excluded in test-libapparmor-test_multi.py.
Therefore we didn't notice that it failed to produce a profile rule when
MountRule was introduced.
Remove testcase_mount_01 from the list of known failures so that it gets
tested - and fix the syntax error in the hand-written
testcase_mount_01.profile.
Also add testcase_mount_02 which is a mount event without fstype,
srcname and class.
Since we are using ubuntu:latest, and noble was released, some tests
are failing.
shellcheck needs python3 to run, which was possibly installed by
default in previous ubuntu images and is no longer the case.
Ignore dist-packages python files during our coverage tests.
Fixes: https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues/388
Signed-off-by: Georgia Garcia <georgia.garcia@canonical.com>
Add a flag that allows setting the error code AppArmor will send when
an operation is denied. This should not be used normally.
Signed-off-by: Georgia Garcia <georgia.garcia@canonical.com>
In some cases, ldd might obtain information by executing the given
binary (see ldd(1)) - which is not something we should do on potentially
unknown binaries, especially because aa-genprof and aa-autodep (and
therefore also ldd) are often started as root.
Additionally, the ldd result typically listed libraries already covered
by abstractions/base, which makes the ldd call superfluous.
While on it,
- remove all references to ldd
- remove code only used for calling ldd and handling its results
- remove tests checking ldd results, and the fake_ldd script
- adjust a test where fake_ldd had added some libraries
- remove ldd path from logprof.conf [settings]
MR: https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/merge_requests/1201
Approved-by: Georgia Garcia <georgia.garcia@canonical.com>
Merged-by: Christian Boltz <apparmor@cboltz.de>
- Before this commit, fstype had to match a known fs. However, having and maintaining the exhaustive list of fstypes proved challenging (see !1195 and !1176). Therefore, we add support for any filesystem name.
- Completing AARE support for fstype (brace expressions like ext{3,4} are now supported).
MR: https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/merge_requests/1198
Approved-by: Christian Boltz <apparmor@cboltz.de>
Merged-by: Christian Boltz <apparmor@cboltz.de>
- Before this commit, fstype had to match a known fs. However, having and maintaining the exhaustive list of fstypes proved challenging (see !1195 and !1176). Therefore, we add support for any filesystem name.
- Completing AARE support for fstype (brace expressions like ext{3,4} are now supported).
In some cases, ldd might obtain information by executing the given
binary (see ldd(1)) - which is not something we should do on potentially
unknown binaries, especially because aa-genprof and aa-autodep (and
therefore also ldd) are often started as root.
Additionally, the ldd result typically listed libraries already covered
by abstractions/base, which makes the ldd call superfluous.
While on it,
- remove all references to ldd
- remove code only used for calling ldd and handling its results
- remove tests checking ldd results, and the fake_ldd script
- adjust a test where fake_ldd had added some libraries
- remove ldd path from logprof.conf [settings]
The abstraction lxc/start-container shipped by the liblxc-common
package uses the following mount rule which was not allowed by our
regexes:
mount options=(rw, make-slave) -> **,
mount options=(rw, make-rslave) -> **,
Since in AppArmor regex ** includes '/' but * by itself doesn't, I'm
adding explicit support for **.
Signed-off-by: Georgia Garcia <georgia.garcia@canonical.com>
* **MountRule: sync flags_keywords with parser code**
... based on /mount.cc mnt_opts_table
Several keywords and aliases were missing in flags_keywords:
- B
- M
- make-private
- make-rprivate
- make-rshared
- make-rslave
- make-runbindable
- make-shared
- make-slave
- make-unbindable
- r
- R
- read-only
- w
Also sort the keywords in the same order as in mount.cc.
Note: AARE handling is still a TODO.
After that, update the list of known parsing failures:
- several valid profiles are now correctly parsed
- some `"make-*" mount opt and an invalid src` bad profiles are no
longer detected as being invalid
* **test-mount.py: fix MountRule instance creation**
If fstype or options is a str, it has to be exactly one keyword, because
\__init__() / check_and_split_list() won't parse a str.
Our "normal" code already honors this, and only hands over fstype and
options as sets or a single-keyword str.
However, a few tests (wrongly) handed over a str that would need further
parsing. Adjust the tests to no longer do this.
* **MountRule: check for unknown fstype and options**
... now that the previous commits fixed issues that ended up as unknown
keywords.
Also add mount/ok_12.sd as known-failing test. It uses fstype=AARE which
MountRule doesn't support (yet?).
MR: https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/merge_requests/1169
Approved-by: Georgia Garcia <georgia.garcia@canonical.com>
Merged-by: Georgia Garcia <georgia.garcia@canonical.com>
... now that the previous commits fixed issues that ended up as unknown
keywords.
Also add mount/ok_12.sd as known-failing test. It uses fstype=AARE which
MountRule doesn't support (yet?).
If fstype or options is a str, it has to be exactly one keyword, because
__init__() / check_and_split_list() won't parse a str.
Our "normal" code already honors this, and only hands over fstype and
options as sets or a single-keyword str.
However, a few tests (wrongly) handed over a str that would need further
parsing. Adjust the tests to no longer do this.
... based on /mount.cc mnt_opts_table
Several keywords and aliases were missing in flags_keywords:
- B
- M
- make-private
- make-rprivate
- make-rshared
- make-rslave
- make-runbindable
- make-shared
- make-slave
- make-unbindable
- r
- R
- read-only
- w
Also sort the keywords in the same order as in mount.cc.
Note: AARE handling is still a TODO.
After that, update the list of known parsing failures:
- several valid profiles are now correctly parsed
- some `"make-*" mount opt and an invalid src` bad profiles are no
longer detected as being invalid
If /proc/filesystems contains a filesystem that is not listed in
MountRule valid_fs, print a useful error message that says what exactly
is going on, instead of only saying "False is not True".
Now that we have MountRule and MountRuleset, drop the old "just store
the whole rule" code for mount rules.
Also drop some old tests that used that "store the whole mount rule"
code, and adjust the regex_matches tests to import the regex directly
from apparmor.regex.
Allow notification filtering of the fields profile, operation, name,
denied_mask, net_family and net_socket using regex. Both command line
and config options in notify.conf are available.
Signed-off-by: Georgia Garcia <georgia.garcia@canonical.com>
The tests for aa-notify that were related to the last login were
assuming that the machine had been logged in at least once in the last
30 days, but that might not be the case.
Update the test to check for the last login date and update the test
logs considering that value.
Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939022
Signed-off-by: Georgia Garcia <georgia.garcia@canonical.com>
Add support for a default_allow mode that facillitates writing profiles
in that allow everything by default. This is not normally recomended
but fascilitates creating basic profiles while working to transition
policy away from unconfined.
This mode is being added specifically to replace the use of the
unconfined flag in these transitional profiles as the use of unconfined
in policy is confusing and does not reflect the semantics of what is
being done.
Generally the goal for policy should be to remove all default_allow
profiles once the policy is fully developed.
Note: this patch only adds parsing of default_allow mode. Currently
it sets the unconfined flag to achieve default allow but this
prevents deny rules from being applied. Once dominance is fixed a
subsequent patch will transition default_allow away from using
the unconfined flag.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
MR: https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/merge_requests/1109
Approved-by: John Johansen <john@jjmx.net>
Merged-by: John Johansen <john@jjmx.net>
Add support for a default_allow mode that facillitates writing profiles
in that allow everything by default. This is not normally recomended
but fascilitates creating basic profiles while working to transition
policy away from unconfined.
This mode is being added specifically to replace the use of the
unconfined flag in these transitional profiles as the use of unconfined
in policy is confusing and does not reflect the semantics of what is
being done.
Generally the goal for policy should be to remove all default_allow
profiles once the policy is fully developed.
Note: this patch only adds parsing of default_allow mode. Currently
it sets the unconfined flag to achieve default allow but this
prevents deny rules from being applied. Once dominance is fixed a
subsequent patch will transition default_allow away from using
the unconfined flag.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Even if this is very unlikely to happen (because of the previously added
test, and because CapabilityRule only allows to specify known severity
keywords), ensure proper behaviour if an unknown severity gets rated.
