mir/bind
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9 synced 2025-08-28 04:58:04 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

new draft

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Mark Andrews 2006-03-27 23:00:54 +00:00
parent a3d739b23b
commit c718f47e64
1 changed files with 53 additions and 53 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

106
doc/draft/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-06.txt → doc/draft/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-07.txt
View File

@ -2,14 +2,14 @@
INTERNET-DRAFT Diffie-Hellman Information in the DNS
OBSOLETES: RFC 2539 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
Motorola Laboratories
Expires: January 2006 July 2005
Expires: September 2006 March 2006
Storage of Diffie-Hellman Keying Information in the DNS
------- -- -------------- ------ ----------- -- --- ---
<draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-06.txt>
<draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-07.txt>
@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Status of This Document
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than a "work in progress."
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/1id-abstracts.html
@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ Abstract
Copyright
Copyright (C) The Internet Society 2005.
@ -72,9 +72,8 @@ Acknowledgements
Table of Contents
Status of This Document....................................1
Status of This Document....................................1
Abstract...................................................1
Copyright..................................................1
Acknowledgements...........................................2
Table of Contents..........................................2
@ -86,12 +85,12 @@ Table of Contents
3. Performance Considerations..............................5
4. IANA Considerations.....................................5
5. Security Considerations.................................5
Copyright and Disclaimer...................................5
Copyright, Disclaimer, and Additional IPR Provisions.......5
Normative References.......................................7
Informative Refences.......................................7
Author Address.............................................8
Author's Address...........................................8
Expiration and File Name...................................8
Appendix A: Well known prime/generator pairs...............9
@ -112,6 +111,7 @@ Table of Contents
D. Eastlake 3rd [Page 2]
@ -135,6 +135,10 @@ INTERNET-DRAFT Diffie-Hellman Information in the DNS
Familiarity with the Diffie-Hellman key exchange algorithm is assumed
[Schneier, RFC 2631].
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.
1.2 About Diffie-Hellman
@ -164,10 +168,6 @@ INTERNET-DRAFT Diffie-Hellman Information in the DNS
mod p which is hard for strong p and g).
The private key for each party is their secret i (or j). The public
key is the pair p and g, which must be the same for the parties, and
their individual X (or Y).
For further information about Diffie-Hellman and precautions to take
D. Eastlake 3rd [Page 3]
@ -176,6 +176,10 @@ D. Eastlake 3rd [Page 3]
INTERNET-DRAFT Diffie-Hellman Information in the DNS
key is the pair p and g, which is the same for both parties, and
their individual X (or Y).
For further information about Diffie-Hellman and precautions to take
in deciding on a p and g, see [RFC 2631].
@ -224,10 +228,6 @@ INTERNET-DRAFT Diffie-Hellman Information in the DNS
D. Eastlake 3rd [Page 4]
@ -274,14 +274,14 @@ INTERNET-DRAFT Diffie-Hellman Information in the DNS
and dependent on security policy.
In addition, the usual Diffie-Hellman key strength considerations
apply. (p-1)/2 should also be prime, g should be primitive mod p, p
should be "large", etc. See [RFC 2631, Schneier].
apply. (p-1)/2 SHOULD also be prime, g SHOULD be primitive mod p, p
SHOULD be "large", etc. See [RFC 2631, Schneier].
Copyright and Disclaimer
Copyright, Disclaimer, and Additional IPR Provisions
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). This document is subject to
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). This document is subject to
the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except
as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
@ -300,27 +300,27 @@ INTERNET-DRAFT Diffie-Hellman Information in the DNS
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
ipr@ietf.org.
@ -352,12 +352,15 @@ INTERNET-DRAFT Diffie-Hellman Information in the DNS
Normative References
[RFC 2631] - "Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Method", E. Rescorla, June
1999.
[RFC 2119] - Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC 2434] - "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section
in RFCs", T. Narten, H. Alvestrand, October 1998.
[RFC 2631] - "Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Method", E. Rescorla, June
1999.
[RFC 4034] - Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S.
Rose, "Resource Records for the DNS Security Extensions", RFC 4034,
March 2005.
@ -399,16 +402,13 @@ Informative Refences
D. Eastlake 3rd [Page 7]
INTERNET-DRAFT Diffie-Hellman Information in the DNS
Author Address
Author's Address
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
Motorola Laboratories
@ -422,9 +422,9 @@ Author Address
Expiration and File Name
This draft expires in January 2006.
This draft expires in September 2006.
Its file name is draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-06.txt.
Its file name is draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-07.txt.
@ -468,11 +468,10 @@ INTERNET-DRAFT Diffie-Hellman Information in the DNS
Appendix A: Well known prime/generator pairs
These numbers are copied from the IPSEC effort where the derivation of
these values is more fully explained and additional information is
available.
Richard Schroeppel performed all the mathematical and computational
work for this appendix.
These numbers are copied from the IPSEC effort where the derivation
of these values is more fully explained and additional information is
available. Richard Schroeppel performed all the mathematical and
computational work for this appendix.
@ -518,6 +517,7 @@ A.2. Well-Known Group 2: A 1024 bit prime
D. Eastlake 3rd [Page 9]