mir/bind
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9 synced 2025-08-30 14:07:59 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

new draft

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Mark Andrews
2003-05-29 01:56:22 +00:00
parent 2ea15c5bd2
commit f09ee013d2
2 changed files with 34 additions and 37 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

23
doc/draft/draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-2535typecode-change-00.txt → doc/draft/draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-2535typecode-change-01.txt
View File

@@ -1,12 +1,9 @@
INTERNET-DRAFT Samuel Weiler
Expires: November 2003 May 12, 2003
Expires: November 2003 May 22, 2003
Legacy Resolver Compatibility for Delegation Signer
draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-2535typecode-change-00.txt
draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-2535typecode-change-01.txt
Status of this Memo
@@ -202,11 +199,14 @@ Abstract
NOT receive special treatment. As an example, if a SIG is included
in a signed zone, there MUST be an RRSIG for it.
As a clarification to previous documents, NSEC can appear in the
authority section of an answer at any time, not just in negative
answers. The mere presence of an NSEC record in the answer or
authority section of an answer with RCODE=NOERROR, MUST NOT be
interpreted as a negative answer. The NSEC must be validated.
As a clarification to previous documents, many positive responses,
including wildcard proofs and insecure referrals, will contain NSEC
RRs. As a result, resolvers MUST NOT treat answers with NSEC RRs
as negative answers merely because they contain an NSEC. A
resolver SHOULD either ignore the NSEC, as a DNSSEC-unaware (or
2535-aware) resolver would, or validate the NSEC and check its
applicability and interpretation as described in [RFC2535] and
[DS].
4. IANA Considerations
@@ -284,6 +284,3 @@ Abstract
weiler@tislabs.com

48
doc/draft/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc1886bis-02.txt → doc/draft/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc1886bis-03.txt
View File

@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
Internet Engineering Task Force S. Thomson, Cisco
INTERNET-DRAFT C. Huitema, Microsoft
February 28, 2003 V. Ksinant, 6WIND
Expires August 28, 2003 M. Souissi, AFNIC
May 12, 2003 V. Ksinant, 6WIND
Expires November 12, 2003 M. Souissi, AFNIC
DNS Extensions to support IP version 6
<draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc1886bis-02.txt>
<draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc1886bis-03.txt>
Status of this Memo
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Status of this Memo
To view the list Internet-Draft Shadow Directories, see
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet Draft expires August 28, 2003.
This Internet Draft expires November 12, 2003.
@@ -54,9 +54,9 @@ Abstract
draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc1886bis-02.txt [Page 1]
draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc1886bis-03.txt [Page 1]
INTERNET-DRAFT DNS Extensions to support IP version 6 February 2003
INTERNET-DRAFT DNS Extensions to support IP version 6 May 2003
Table of Contents
@@ -109,9 +109,9 @@ Table of Contents
that has more than one IPv6 address must have more than one such
record.
draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc1886bis-02.txt [Page 2]
draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc1886bis-03.txt [Page 2]
INTERNET-DRAFT DNS Extensions to support IP version 6 February 2003
INTERNET-DRAFT DNS Extensions to support IP version 6 May 2003
2.1 AAAA record type
@@ -165,9 +165,9 @@ INTERNET-DRAFT DNS Extensions to support IP version 6 February 2003
b.a.9.8.7.6.5.0.4.0.0.0.3.0.0.0.2.0.0.0.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1.2.3.4.IP6.
ARPA.
draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc1886bis-02.txt [Page 3]
draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc1886bis-03.txt [Page 3]
INTERNET-DRAFT DNS Extensions to support IP version 6 February 2003
INTERNET-DRAFT DNS Extensions to support IP version 6 May 2003
3. MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING QUERY TYPES
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ APPENDIX A: Changes from RFC 1886
EXISTING QUERY TYPES"
- Added security considerations.
- Updated references :
* From RFC 1884 to RFC 2373 (IP Version 6 Addressing
* From RFC 1884 to RFC 3513 (IP Version 6 Addressing
Architecture).
* From "work in progress" to RFC 2893 (Transition Mechanisms for
IPv6 Hosts and Routers).
@@ -219,9 +219,9 @@ APPENDIX A: Changes from RFC 1886
draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc1886bis-02.txt [Page 4]
draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc1886bis-03.txt [Page 4]
INTERNET-DRAFT DNS Extensions to support IP version 6 February 2003
INTERNET-DRAFT DNS Extensions to support IP version 6 May 2003
Acknowledgements
@@ -244,16 +244,13 @@ Normative References
tion", STD 13, RFC 1035, USC/Information Sciences Institute,
November 1987.
[3] Hinden, R., and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing
Architecture", RFC 2373, Nokia, Cisco, July 1998.
This RFC is being updated. The current draft is
"draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-11.txt", Hinden, R., and
S. Deering, October 25, 2002
Informative References
[3] Hinden, R., and S. Deering, "Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)
Addressing Architecture", RFC 3513, Nokia, Cisco, April 2003.
[4] Gilligan, R., and E. Nordmark, "Transition Mechanisms for IPv6
Hosts and Routers", RFC 2893, FreeGate Corp., Sun Microsystems
Inc., August 2000.
@@ -275,9 +272,12 @@ Informative References
RFC 2845, ISC, NAI Labs, Motorola, Nominum, May 2000.
draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc1886bis-02.txt [Page 5]
draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc1886bis-03.txt [Page 5]
INTERNET-DRAFT DNS Extensions to support IP version 6 February 2003
INTERNET-DRAFT DNS Extensions to support IP version 6 May 2003
Authors' Addresses
@@ -329,9 +329,9 @@ Authors' Addresses
draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc1886bis-02.txt [Page 6]
draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc1886bis-03.txt [Page 6]
INTERNET-DRAFT DNS Extensions to support IP version 6 February 2003
INTERNET-DRAFT DNS Extensions to support IP version 6 May 2003
Full Copyright Statement
@@ -387,4 +387,4 @@ Full Copyright Statement
information to the IETF Executive Director.
draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc1886bis-02.txt [Page 7]
draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc1886bis-03.txt [Page 7]