Commit dc6dafdad1bce4c59bec0dbc355650c384cfc4d9 allows larger TTL values
in zones that go insecure, and ignores the maximum zone TTL.
This means that if you use TTL values larger than 1 day in your zone,
your zone runs the risk of going bogus before it moves safely to
insecure.
Most resolvers by default cap the maximum TTL that they cache RRsets,
at one day (Unbound, Knot, PowerDNS) so that is fine. However, BIND 9's
default is one week.
Change the default TTLsig to one week, so that also for BIND 9
resolvers in the default cases responses for zones that are going
insecure will not be evaluated as bogus.
This change does mean that when unsigning your zone, it will take six
days longer to safely go insecure, regardless of what TTL values you
use in the zone.
these options concentrate zone maintenance actions into
bursts for the benefit of servers with intermittent connections.
that's no longer something we really need to optimize.
'HOME=value command' should only change HOME for command but on
some platforms this occasionally sets HOME for the rest of the
test. Explicitly isolate the enviroment change using a sub shell.
Allow larger TTL values in zones that go insecure. This is necessary
because otherwise the zone will not be loaded due to the max-zone-ttl
of P1D that is part of the current insecure policy.
In the keymgr.c code, default back to P1D if the max-zone-ttl is set
to zero.
When using automated DNSSEC management, it is required that the zone
is dynamic, or that inline-signing is enabled (or both). Update the
checkconf code to also allow inline-signing to be enabled within
dnssec-policy.
Add an option to enable/disable inline-signing inside the
dnssec-policy clause. The existing inline-signing option that is
set in the zone clause takes priority, but if it is omitted, then the
value that is set in dnssec-policy is taken.
The built-in policies use inline-signing.
This means that if you want to use the default policy without
inline-signing you either have to set it explicitly in the zone
clause:
zone "example" {
...
dnssec-policy default;
inline-signing no;
};
Or create a new policy, only overriding the inline-signing option:
dnssec-policy "default-dynamic" {
inline-signing no;
};
zone "example" {
...
dnssec-policy default-dynamic;
};
This also means that if you are going insecure with a dynamic zone,
the built-in "insecure" policy needs to be accompanied with
"inline-signing no;".
The updatenotify mechanism in dns_db relied on unlocked ISC_LIST for
adding and removing the "listeners". The mechanism relied on the
exclusive mode - it should have been updated only during reconfiguration
of the server. This turned not to be true anymore in the dns_catz - the
updatenotify list could have been updated during offloaded work as the
offloaded threads are not subject to the exclusive mode.
Change the update_listeners to be cds_lfht (lock-free hash-table), and
slightly refactor how register and unregister the callbacks - the calls
are now idempotent (the register call already was and the return value
of the unregister function was mostly ignored by the callers).
Add simple rwlock unit test and rwlock benchmark. The benchmark
compares the pthread rwlock with isc rwlock implementation, so it's
mainly useful when developing a new isc rwlock implementation.
Because rcu_barrier() needs to be called as many times as the number of
nested call_rcu() calls (call_rcu() calls made from call_rcu thread),
and currently there's no mechanism to detect whether there are more
call_rcu callbacks scheduled, we simply call the rcu_barrier() multiple
times. The overhead is negligible and it prevents rare assertion
failures caused by the check for memory leaks in isc__mem_destroy().
After the dns_badcache refactoring, the dns_badcache_destroy() would
call call_rcu(). The dns_message_checksig cleanup which calls
dns_view_detach() happens in the atexit handler, so there might be
call_rcu threads started very late in the process. The liburcu
registers library destructor that destroys the data structured internal
to liburcu and this clashes with the call_rcu thread that just got
started in the atexit() handler causing either (depending on timing):
- a normal run
- a straight segfault
- an assertion failure from liburcu
Instead of trying to cleanup the dns_message_checksig unit, ignore the
leaked memory as we do with all the other fuzzing tests.
The load-names benchmark was originally only measuring single thread
performance of the data structures. As this is not how those are used
in the real life, it was refactored to be multi-threaded with proper
protections in place (rwlock for ht, hashmap and rbt; transactions for
qp).
The qp test has been extended to see effect of the dns_qp_compact() and
rcu_barrier() on the overall speed and memory consumption.
The dns_badcache unit had (yet another) own locked hashtable
implementation. Replace the hashtable used by dns_badcache with
lock-free cds_lfht implementation from liburcu.
When dns_request was canceled via dns_requestmgr_shutdown() the cancel
event would be propagated on different loop (loop 0) than the loop where
request was created on. In turn this would propagate down to isc_netmgr
where we require all the events to be called from the matching isc_loop.
Pin the dns_requests to the loops and ensure that all the events are
called on the associated loop. This in turn allows us to remove the
hashed locks on the requests and change the single .requests list to be
a per-loop list for the request accounting.
Additionally, do some extra cleanup because some race condititions are
now not possible as all events on the dns_request are serialized.
With ThreadSanitizer support added to the Userspace RCU, we no longer
need to wrap the call_rcu and caa_container_of with
__tsan_{acquire,release} hints. Remove the direct calls to
__tsan_{acquire,release} and the isc_urcu_{container,cleanup} macros.
