dnsop-wg-materials/chairs-notes-2021.md

# Chairs Meeting Notes

This File: https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/wg-materials/blob/main/chairs-notes-2021.md

Doc Status: https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/wg-materials/blob/main/dnsop-document-status.md

## 2021-11-19

* WGLC 5933-bis
    - [X] Tim WGLC

* Adopting new work
    - Considering a poll on which work adopt, preference to -bis docs

* Interim Planning
    - 8499-bis, ns-revalidation
    - [X] Benno send out poll

* Experiment: one session next time
    - will continue to discuss


## 2021-10-15

- Second interim timing

- Call for for agenda items
    - cutoff 10/25 (update to WG after Tim asks Warren his q’s…) 

- respond to Fujiwara on his email


- 2 Qs for warren
     - 5933-bis
     - can we adopt drafts again?

- ns-revalidation
  - benno


## 2021-10-04

* [ ] Second Interim Planning
    - Possibly week of October 11 - 12, 13, 14
    - [X] Benno send note to list
    - Possible options
        + error-reporting
        + nsec3-guidance
        + ns-revalidation

* [ ] Send out Emails!

## 2021-09-17

* avoid-fragmentation
- Q - can this doc be a BCP if it’s a range of values?
    + (Chairs believe so; the ‘best current practice’ being recommended is to tune this parameter as potentially important, not accept system defaults w/out looking)
- Single value or range of values?
    + Appropriate value(s)? (Different values may be appropriate for different conditions; how much detail to include?)
    + Editorial changes for readability?
- preferred value needs to be justified, not just stated

* dnsop-glue-is-not-optional
    - Is sibling glue optional or required? (MUST or SHOULD)
    - Examples of valid sibling glue
    - Also bad/invalid examples
    - Clarification on truncated glue

* Ben: Two questions: what is the glue policy, and what happens when the glue doesn't fit
    - Suggestion: Separate out the glue policy
    - Permit a range of behaviors


## 2021-09-03

* Interim Planning
    - Benno to work on slides with authors of drafts
    - Tim & Suzanne will lead discussion (middle of the night for Benno!)

* [ ] Second Interim Planning
    - Possibly week of October 11 - 12, 13, 14
    - Chairs will discuss after 14 September Interim 

* [ ] Special Use Domain Names
    - [ ] Talk to Wes, think of next steps
    - [ ] Suzanne to revive "[Guidelines for Use of the Special Use Names Registry"](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-stw-6761ext/)
    - [ ] Warren/ Chairs to talk to WG about writing the "solution" part of ["Special-Use Domain Names Problem Statement"](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8244)

* [ ] RFC8499bis updates going to start up
    - Authors are putting together to-do list 
    - Please submit suggestions (the chairs have)

## 2021-08-20

* [X] draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones
    - [X] Tim to follow up

* [x] draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-error-reporting
    - Reach out to authors
    - [x] Benno to follow up

* [x] draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis
    - Reach out to authors to begin work
    - [x] Tim to follow up

## 2021-08-06

* [x] [NAPTR RR References](https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters) in IANA Registry Out of Date
    - Email from Amanda
    - Tim will monitor
    - Appears to be consensus with Amanda and Experts

* [x] [DNSSEC Bootstrapping Draft](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomassen-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping/)
    - draft-thomassen-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping@ietf.org

* [ ] RFC ISE Email on ["Common implementation anti-patterns related to Domain Name System (DNS) resource record (RR) processing"](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dashevskyi-dnsrr-antipatterns/)
    - [DNSOP Email](https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/y_wtoNwl2jRcoqOBgTOu3KJ9SE4/)
    - Chairs to review
    - [ ] Request WG to review and discuss.
    
* [x] draft-sekar-dns-ul
    - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sekar-dns-ul/
    - suggestion: stay in dns-sd, and reviews from dnsop
    - dnssd CfA started

* [ ] [draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation/)
    - value or values, possible interim candidate
    - [X] Benno to follow up

* [ ] [draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional/)
    - few issues came up during meeting to address
    - interim candidate
    - [X] Benno to followup

* [X] First Interim
    - First - week of September 13 - 14 or 15
    - [x] Chairs to send email to DNS letting them know
    - [x] Figure out agenda.

* [ ] Special Use Domain Names
    - [ ] Talk to Wes, think of next steps
    - [ ] Suzanne to revive "[Guidelines for Use of the Special Use Names Registry"](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-stw-6761ext/)
    - [ ] Warren/ Chairs to talk to WG about writing the "solution" part of ["Special-Use Domain Names Problem Statement"](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8244)