From 0c62c9774b2a567ef437d63986907355e7402c7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Wicinski Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 18:12:52 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] doc status updates --- dnsop-document-status.md | 11 ++++++----- .../interim-2021-dnsop-01-minutes.txt | 2 +- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/dnsop-document-status.md b/dnsop-document-status.md index aa25d9c..a9fd3ca 100644 --- a/dnsop-document-status.md +++ b/dnsop-document-status.md @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ # DNSOP Chairs Status -### Updated: 3 September 2021 +### Updated: 2 October 2021 Official document list: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/documents/ @@ -13,20 +13,21 @@ Questions, Concerns, etc: dnsop-chairs at ietf.org ### RFC Ed Queue +* ["DNS Query Name Minimisation to Improve Privacy" - draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis/) + + ## IESG Queue -* ["DNS Query Name Minimisation to Improve Privacy" - draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis/) - - **Status**: Revised ID needed * ["DNS Transport over TCP - Operational Requirements" - draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements/) - AD Evaluation - - **Status**: IETF Last Call Ends 2021-09-03 + - **Status**: Waiting for Go-Ahead * ["Service binding and parameter specification via the DNS (DNS SVCB and HTTPS RRs)" - draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https/) - **Status**: Authors Finish up LC comments * ["Revised IANA Considerations for DNSSEC"](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-iana-cons/) - - IETF Last Call until 2021-09-16 + - Telechat 2021-10-07 ## WGLC Approved diff --git a/interim-2021-dnsop-01/interim-2021-dnsop-01-minutes.txt b/interim-2021-dnsop-01/interim-2021-dnsop-01-minutes.txt index bcd7751..35bef9a 100644 --- a/interim-2021-dnsop-01/interim-2021-dnsop-01-minutes.txt +++ b/interim-2021-dnsop-01/interim-2021-dnsop-01-minutes.txt @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Duane Wessels Ben: Make it fail Paul: Would need to change the wording for RFC 1034 if we go to SHOULD John Levine: Clarify the new sentence for 1034 - Agrees with Ben on MUST NOT for sibling loops + Agrees with Ben on soMUST NOT for sibling loops Worth adding more words Duane: Please send text Warren: There should be an example of a sibling glue loop