diff --git a/dnsop-document-status.txt b/dnsop-document-status.txt index 5b20e7d..9a5de02 100644 --- a/dnsop-document-status.txt +++ b/dnsop-document-status.txt @@ -1,7 +1,10 @@ # DNSOP Chairs Status -#### Updated: 17 July 2018 +### Updated: 25 July 2018 Official document list: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/documents/ +This Document: https://github.com/DNSOP/wg-materials/blob/master/dnsop-document-status.txt + +Questions, Concerns, etc: dnsop-chairs at ietf.org ## IESG Queue @@ -11,25 +14,27 @@ Official document list: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/documents/ * draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns +* draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel + +* draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis + +* draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf + +* draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix + ## Limbo * draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld - Held by WG. - Pending guidance from the IESG/IAB +* draft-song-dns-wireformat-http + - Parked + ## WG Chairs Work -* draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel - - awaiting write up - -* draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis - - awaiting write-up - -* draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf - - awaiting write up - -* draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix - - awaiting write up +* draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format + - Revision to address version numbers and math ## In WG Last Call @@ -37,9 +42,6 @@ Official document list: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/documents/ - WGLC Ends 20 Friday 2018 - Consensus is extremely rough -* draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format - - WGLC Ends 20 Friday 2018 - * draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost - Waiting on Authors since 2018-02-19 @@ -53,22 +55,18 @@ Official document list: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/documents/ ## Adopted -* draft-ietf-dnsop-aname - - Authors getting editing help - * draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale - May be too contentious * draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements - Section 4 and 5.3 TODOs, John and Duane are working on - -* draft-song-dns-wireformat-http - - Needs to be updated to reflect DOH * draft-huque-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec ## Expired Adopted Documents +* draft-ietf-dnsop-aname + * draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error - Last list discussion was 2017-11-07 @@ -77,19 +75,20 @@ Official document list: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/documents/ ## Call for Adoption +* draft-bortzmeyer-rfc7816bis + +* draft-kh-dnsop-7706bis ## Candidates For Adoption -* draft-bortzmeyer-rfc7816bis - * draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes + * draft-wessels-dns-zone-digest -* draft-kh-dnsop-7706bis + * draft-song-atr-large-resp ## Documents Worth Considering - * draft-jabley-dnsop-bootstrap-validator - Signs point to yes @@ -102,11 +101,9 @@ Official document list: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/documents/ * draft-spacek-edns-camel-diet - ## New Documents - ## Needs more Review ## Not At This Time @@ -114,11 +111,6 @@ Official document list: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/documents/ * draft-muks-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones - considered but WG passed on -* draft-bellis-dnsop-xpf - - No significant interest - -* draft-gavrichenkov-dnsop-dnssapi - * draft-tariq-dnsop-iviptr diff --git a/dnsop-ietf102/dnsop-ietf102-minutes-1.txt b/dnsop-ietf102/dnsop-ietf102-minutes-1.txt index 3e0ec89..86f99a8 100644 --- a/dnsop-ietf102/dnsop-ietf102-minutes-1.txt +++ b/dnsop-ietf102/dnsop-ietf102-minutes-1.txt @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ Wes: Wants more feedback about what should go into the document How complex should the signaling be? Giovane Moura: Should go to see presentation in MAPRG tomorrow +### Chairs Action: Needs More Review ------- [[ Day 2 starts here ]] @@ -255,7 +256,8 @@ Peter van Dijk: ATR changes a best case from 2 packets into 5 packets APNIC research is useless We are making amplification attacks worse We have no intent to implement and is against adoption -## Chairs Action: Some interest but not enough for adoption at this time + +### Chairs Action: Some interest but not enough for adoption at this time draft-tariq-dnsop-iviptr, Tariq Saraj Mark: Zero interest in implementing with this @@ -264,7 +266,8 @@ Doesn't think enough people will use these records Ondřej: This is about IDR Pushing provisioning problems into the DNS Should not be implemented -## Chairs Action: No Interest + +### Chairs Action: No Interest draft-wessels-dns-zone-digest, Wes Hardaker George: Remove "Merkle trees" @@ -289,8 +292,27 @@ Wes: Yes Mark: It is possible to do something similar: hash just the delegation points Will work with dynamic updates Also can loose RRSIGs -## Chairs Action: Interest in continuing, multiple implementations. + +### Chairs Action: Interest in continuing, multiple implementations. draft-kh-dnsop-7706bis, Paul Hoffman-Kumari +Geoff: Imagine I'm on a server on a host, I'm multi-homed, and forwards from IP to the other. Am I breaking the rules? +Paul: Question for the doc. +Geoff: What if I have 3 IPs? You're trying to constrain the moment. You can't apply constraint. +Paul: We should discuss this in the document. +Shane: Aggressive NSEC now published, should reduce temptation... +Paul: Why? +Shane: All cache misses will be handled Locally... +Paul: One reason of 7706 is to preserve privacy. If you pull the root and pre-loading, nothing leaks. +Shane: Will send text on performance +Andrew: If people do weird things, no protocol police... +Paul: Fairies but not police +Wes: IETF document what people do on the internet. We should adopt +Ray: Don't care on restrictions, local mirror of root zone is more important. +Ondrej: Feel more Strongly than Ray and Andrew, don't understand why its wrong. +Peter (via Dan): All Major Resolvers decided not to 7706 directly, so update is necessary. adopt +Lars: Can change the keys. -## Chairs Action: Sounds like Interest in Contuining +### Chairs Action: Interest in adoption + +### Chairs Action: Sounds like Interest in Contuining