mirror of
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/wg-materials
synced 2025-08-22 02:09:16 +00:00
updated minutes; added 107 actions
This commit is contained in:
parent
e4e60ed2e6
commit
6c881b3165
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
# DNSOP Chairs Status
|
||||
### Updated: 8 April 2020
|
||||
### Updated: 18 April 2020
|
||||
|
||||
Official document list: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/documents/
|
||||
|
||||
@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ Questions, Concerns, etc: dnsop-chairs at ietf.org
|
||||
## IESG Queue
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec
|
||||
- Revised ID Needed
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc2845bis
|
||||
- Revised ID Needed
|
||||
@ -60,26 +61,29 @@ Questions, Concerns, etc: dnsop-chairs at ietf.org
|
||||
|
||||
## Active Calls for Adoption
|
||||
|
||||
## Candidates For Adoption
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-fujiwara-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation
|
||||
- ends 27 April
|
||||
|
||||
## Candidates For Adoption
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-pwouters-powerbind
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-huque-dnsop-ns-revalidation
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-andrews-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-belyavskiy-rfc5933-bis
|
||||
|
||||
## New Documents
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-brotman-rdbd
|
||||
|
||||
* andrews-dnsop-defeat-frag-attack
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-tapril-ns2
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-zone-provisioning-yang
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-livingood-dnsop-dont-switch-resolvers
|
||||
|
22
dnsop-ietf107/dnsop-ietf107-actions.md
Normal file
22
dnsop-ietf107/dnsop-ietf107-actions.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
||||
# dnsop-ietf107-actions
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc
|
||||
- Want to encourage Interop testing, and WGLC before 108
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis
|
||||
- New Version, then working toward WGLC
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-fujiwara-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation
|
||||
- Call for Adoption sent
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-pwouters-powerbind
|
||||
- Call for Adoption to go out
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-tapril-ns2
|
||||
- Need work and discussion with ADD/DPRIVE/DNSOP chairs
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones
|
||||
- Put on list as candidate for adoption
|
||||
|
||||
* draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-zone-provisioning-yang
|
||||
- More work and review needed
|
@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ Paul Vixie: I proposed removing port number. add a warning that operators should
|
||||
Non-default ports may be firewalled in client networks, so may appear to work in testing but may not work for some clients/users.
|
||||
Ben Schwartz: We can fix this with 1-2 sentences
|
||||
|
||||
Chairs: Want to encourage Interop testing, and WGLC before 108
|
||||
Chairs Action: Want to encourage Interop testing, and WGLC before 108
|
||||
|
||||
### DNS Query Name Minimisation to Improve Privacy (bis)
|
||||
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis/
|
||||
@ -51,19 +51,19 @@ Chairs: Want to encourage Interop testing, and WGLC before 108
|
||||
- Chairs Action: How close to WGLC?
|
||||
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-interim-2020-dnsop-01-sessa-draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis/
|
||||
|
||||
Ralf Weber: don't minimize forwarding;
|
||||
Ralf Weber: don't minimize forwarding; don't recommend complex mechanisms
|
||||
Jim Reid: query limiting - wording on labels
|
||||
Stehane Bortzmeyer: number of queries - SHOULD is reasonable (also, see section 7.1 of RFC 1035)
|
||||
Paul Vixie: 1) auth misconfig hard to detect, mixed-mode authority and delegation disappeared. with NS, answer in answer section.
|
||||
2) rate limiting have ddos implications.
|
||||
Joe Abley: choice of qtype - use SOA as an option.
|
||||
Ralph: small set of qtypes
|
||||
Joe: any benefit to a small set?
|
||||
Paul: Agree with Joe, SOA should be in the mix
|
||||
Mark Andrews: Forwarders and qname
|
||||
Paul Vixie: 1) auth misconfig hard to detect, mixed-mode authority and the delegation has disappeared.
|
||||
with qtype=NS, answer in answer section. 2) rate limiting have ddos implications.
|
||||
Joe Abley: not all qtypes are equal. choice of qtype - use 1 qtype and use SOA as an option.
|
||||
Ralph Dolmans: maybe small set of qtypes
|
||||
Joe Abley: any benefit to a small set?
|
||||
Paul Vixie: Agree with Joe, SOA should be in the mix
|
||||
Mark Andrews: Forwarders should be trusted, but can't trust beyong forwarder
|
||||
Warren Kumari: Why are we not using the original qtype
|
||||
Ralph: Pick the most common qtype the upstream would use
|
||||
Ralph: NS queries are sometimes blocked, but A are not.
|
||||
Ralph Dolmans: Pick the most common qtype the upstream would use
|
||||
Ralph Dolmans: Unbound switched from NS to A, NS queries are sometimes blocked, but A are not.
|
||||
Erik Nygren: A vs AAAA query. A may stick out more.
|
||||
|
||||
Chairs Action: New Version, then working toward WGLC
|
||||
@ -74,36 +74,40 @@ Chairs Action: New Version, then working toward WGLC
|
||||
### Avoid IP fragmentation in DNS
|
||||
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fujiwara-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation/
|
||||
- Kazunori Fujiwara, 15 min
|
||||
- Chairs Action: Adopt?
|
||||
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-interim-2020-dnsop-01-sessa-avoid-fragmentation-in-dns/
|
||||
|
||||
Joe Abley: this is useful
|
||||
Ralf Weber: Useful
|
||||
Paul Vixie: No intent to design Path MTU Discovery. Allow someone to do that.
|
||||
|
||||
Chairs Action: CfA sent
|
||||
|
||||
### The Delegation_Only DNSKEY flag
|
||||
- https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pwouters-powerbind-03
|
||||
- Paul Wouters, 10 min
|
||||
- Chairs Action: Adopt?
|
||||
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-interim-2020-dnsop-01-sessa-slides-interim-2020-dnsop-01-draft-pwouters-powerbind/
|
||||
|
||||
ben Schwartz: Why does it need to be machine readable?
|
||||
Peter van Dijk:
|
||||
Ralf Weber:
|
||||
Ben Schwartz: Likes DNSSEC transparency, Why does it need to be machine readable?
|
||||
Paul Wouters: How to put into resolvers? Send Q to list
|
||||
Peter van Dijk: Authorative should check during loading; does not protect child apex delegation.
|
||||
Ralf Weber: resolver has to do work. technical solution to political problem.
|
||||
Joe Abley: adding complexity must have problem to solve
|
||||
PW: Large outside subset to never trust DNSSEC.
|
||||
Wes Hardaker: DNSSEC transparency because don't trust DNSSEC
|
||||
Paul Wouters: Large outside subset to never trust DNSSEC.
|
||||
Wes Hardaker: DNSSEC transparency because don't trust DNSSEC properly
|
||||
Joe Abley: World is not as clean as it seems
|
||||
Warren Kumari:
|
||||
Matthijs Mekking:
|
||||
Warren Kumari: Not sure how this behaves
|
||||
Paul Wouters: Log all DS changes once this is set
|
||||
Wes Hardaker: currently have to log every signed record for DNSSEC transparency. with this bit, only log DS records
|
||||
Matthijs Mekking:
|
||||
|
||||
Chairs Action: Will send out CfA
|
||||
|
||||
### Parameterized Nameserver Delegation with NS2 and NS2T
|
||||
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tapril-ns2/
|
||||
- Tim April, 15 min
|
||||
- Chairs Action:
|
||||
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-interim-2020-dnsop-01-sessa-slides-draft-tapril-ns2/
|
||||
|
||||
Sam Weiler: Chil/Parent/both no restrictions. new record type that only appears on the parent is a can of worms.
|
||||
Sam Weiler: Child/Parent/both no restrictions. new record type that only appears on the parent is a can of worms.
|
||||
Matt Pounsett: if redesigning NS, remove the current ambiquity.
|
||||
Joe Abley: Can allow clients to never use old polocy
|
||||
Peter van Dijk: Agree with Sam/Joe, as a resolver implementor, this is scary.
|
||||
@ -112,14 +116,19 @@ Paul Hoffman: Similiar to work done in ADD queue
|
||||
Ralf Weber: Stub/resolver different than resolver/authorative
|
||||
Ben Schwartz: Work like this is blocking current dprive work
|
||||
|
||||
Chairs Action: Need work and discussion with ADD/DPRIVE/DNSOP chairs
|
||||
|
||||
### DNS Catalog Zones & A Data Model for Configuring DNS Zone Provisioning
|
||||
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones/
|
||||
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-zone-provisioning-yang/
|
||||
- Willem Toorop, 15 min
|
||||
- Chairs Action:
|
||||
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-interim-2020-dnsop-01-sessa-cross-implementation-configuration-and-provisioning-management/
|
||||
|
||||
Vixie: Will drop metazone in favor of this
|
||||
Wes Hardaker: would be good to suceed; should look at RFC6168
|
||||
Paul Vixie: supports; Will drop metazone in favor of this
|
||||
|
||||
Chairs Action: Catalog Zones - CfA
|
||||
Chairs Action: Yang - Needs work
|
||||
|
||||
#
|
||||
## Reference
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user