mirror of
https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/kea
synced 2025-08-31 14:05:33 +00:00
[3873] FAQ/troubleshooting section added.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ dist_html_DATA = $(HTMLDOCS) kea-guide.css
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
DOCBOOK = kea-guide.xml intro.xml quickstart.xml install.xml admin.xml config.xml
|
DOCBOOK = kea-guide.xml intro.xml quickstart.xml install.xml admin.xml config.xml
|
||||||
DOCBOOK += keactrl.xml dhcp4-srv.xml dhcp6-srv.xml logging.xml ddns.xml hooks.xml
|
DOCBOOK += keactrl.xml dhcp4-srv.xml dhcp6-srv.xml logging.xml ddns.xml hooks.xml
|
||||||
DOCBOOK += libdhcp.xml lfc.xml stats.xml ctrl-channel.xml
|
DOCBOOK += libdhcp.xml lfc.xml stats.xml ctrl-channel.xml faq.xml
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
EXTRA_DIST = $(DOCBOOK)
|
EXTRA_DIST = $(DOCBOOK)
|
||||||
DISTCLEANFILES = $(HTMLDOCS) $(DOCS) kea-messages.xml
|
DISTCLEANFILES = $(HTMLDOCS) $(DOCS) kea-messages.xml
|
||||||
|
134
doc/guide/faq.xml
Normal file
134
doc/guide/faq.xml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
|
|||||||
|
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||||
|
<!DOCTYPE book PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.2//EN"
|
||||||
|
"http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.2/docbookx.dtd" [
|
||||||
|
<!ENTITY mdash "—" >
|
||||||
|
]>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<chapter id="faq">
|
||||||
|
<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<para>This chapter contains a number of frequently asked questions and
|
||||||
|
troubleshooting tips. It currently lacks content, but it is expected to grow
|
||||||
|
over time.</para>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!-- Note: you may be tempted to put in questions here that concern current
|
||||||
|
missing features or known issues type of stuff. Please do not do that.
|
||||||
|
This section should only contain questions that will still be valid in
|
||||||
|
at least 2 years. If you have something short term, please consider putting
|
||||||
|
it in the known issues list. -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<section id="faq-generic">
|
||||||
|
<title>Generic Frequently Asked Questions</title>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<section id="q1-generic">
|
||||||
|
<title>Where did the Kea name came from?</title>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<para>Kea is a name of high mountain parrot living in New Zealand.
|
||||||
|
See this <ulink url="https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/kea-users/2014-October/000032.html" />
|
||||||
|
for an extended answer.</para>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
</section>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<section id="q2-generic">
|
||||||
|
<title>Feature X is not supported yet. When/if will it be available?</title>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<para>Kea is developed by a small team of engineers. Our resources are
|
||||||
|
limited, so we need to prioritize requests. The complexity of a new
|
||||||
|
feature (how difficult is it to implement a feature and how likely it
|
||||||
|
would break something that already works), amount of work required and
|
||||||
|
expected popularity (i.e. how many users would actually benefit from it)
|
||||||
|
are three leading factors. We sometimes also have contractual obligations.
|
||||||
|
</para>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<para> Simply stating that you'd like feature X is useful. We try to
|
||||||
|
implement features that are actively requested first, but the reality
|
||||||
|
is that we have more requests than we can handle, so some of them must
|
||||||
|
be postponed, at least in the near future. So is your request likely to
|
||||||
|
be reject? Not at all. You can do many things to greatly improve chances
|
||||||
|
of your request to be fulfilled. First, it helps to explain why you
|
||||||
|
need a feature. If your explanation is reasonable and there are likely
|
||||||
|
other users that would benefit from it, the chances for Kea developers
|
||||||
|
to put this task on a roadmap is better. Saying that you are willing
|
||||||
|
to participate in tests (e.g. test engineering drops when they become
|
||||||
|
available) is also helpful.</para>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<para>Another thing you can do to greatly improve chances of a feature
|
||||||
|
to appear is to actually develop it on your own and submit a patch.
|
||||||
|
That's a venue that people often forget about. Kea is an open source
|
||||||
|
software and we do accept patches. There are certain requirements, like
|
||||||
|
code quality, comments, unit-tests, documentation, etc., but we have
|
||||||
|
accepted a significant number of patches in the past, so it's doable.
|
||||||
|
Accepted contributions range from minor documentation corrections to
|
||||||
|
significant new features, like support for new database type. Before
|
||||||
|
considering writing and submitting a patch, make sure you read
|
||||||
|
Contributor's Guide in <ulink url="http://git.kea.isc.org/~tester/kea/doxygen/">Kea Developer's Guide</ulink>.
|
||||||
|
</para>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<para>Kea is developed by ISC, which is non-profit organization.
|
||||||
|
You may consider signing a development contract with us. In the past
|
||||||
|
we did implement certain features due to contractual obligations.
|
||||||
|
With additional funds we are able to put extra engineering efforts
|
||||||
|
into Kea development. We can reshuffle our schedule or add extra
|
||||||
|
hands to the team if needed. Please keep in mind that Kea is an
|
||||||
|
open source software and its principal goal is to provide good DHCP
|
||||||
|
solution that can be used by everyone. In other words, we may
|
||||||
|
refuse a contract that would tie the solution to specific proprietary
|
||||||
|
technology or make it unusable for other users. Also, we strive to
|
||||||
|
make Kea a reference implementation, so if your proposal significantly
|
||||||
|
violates RFC, we may have a problem with that. Nevertheless, please
|
||||||
|
talk to us and we may be able to find a solution.</para>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<para>Finally, Kea has a <ulink url="http://kea.isc.org/roadmap">public
|
||||||
|
roadmap</ulink>, with releases happening several times each year. We tend
|
||||||
|
to not modify features for current milestone, unless there are very good
|
||||||
|
reasons to do so. Therefore "I'd like a featury X in 6 months" is much
|
||||||
|
better received than "I'd like a feature X now".</para>
|
||||||
|
</section>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
</section>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<section id="faq-dhcp4">
|
||||||
|
<title>Frequently Asked Questions about DHCPv4</title>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<section iq="q1-dhcp4">
|
||||||
|
<title>I set up a firewall, but Kea server still receives the traffic. Why?</title>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<para>Any DHCPv4 server must be able to receive from and send traffic to the
|
||||||
|
hosts that don't have an IPv4 address assigned yet. That is typically not
|
||||||
|
possible with regular UDP sockets, therefore Kea DHCPv4 server uses raw
|
||||||
|
sockets by default. Raw sockets mean that the incoming packets are received
|
||||||
|
as raw Ethernet frames, thus bypassing the whole kernel IP stack, including
|
||||||
|
any firewalling rules your kernel may provide.</para>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<para>If you do not want the server to use raw sockets, it is possible to
|
||||||
|
config Kea DHCPv4 server to use UDP sockets instead. See <command>dhcp-socket-type</command>
|
||||||
|
described in <xref linkend="dhcp4-interface-configuration" />. However,
|
||||||
|
using UDP sockets have certain limitations. In particular, it may not allow
|
||||||
|
to send responses directly to the clients without IPv4 addresses assigned.
|
||||||
|
That's ok, if all your traffic is coming through relay agents.</para>
|
||||||
|
</section>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
</section> <!-- end of DHCPv4 FAQ section -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<section id="faq-dhcp6">
|
||||||
|
<title>Frequently Asked Questions about DHCPv6</title>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<section iq="q1-dhcp6">
|
||||||
|
<title>Kea DHCPv6 doesn't seem to get incoming traffic. I checked with tcpdump (or other traffic
|
||||||
|
capture software) that the incoming traffic is reaching the box. What's wrong?</title>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<para>Please check whether your OS has any IPv6 filtering rules. Many
|
||||||
|
operating systems are shipped with firewalls that discard incoming IPv6
|
||||||
|
traffic by default. In particular, many Linux distributions do that. Please
|
||||||
|
check the output of the following command:
|
||||||
|
<screen>
|
||||||
|
# <userinput>ip6tables -L -n</userinput></screen>
|
||||||
|
One common mistake in this area is to use <command>iptables</command> tool,
|
||||||
|
which lists IPv4 firewall rules only.
|
||||||
|
</para>
|
||||||
|
</section>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
</section> <!-- end of DHCPv6 FAQ section -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
</chapter>
|
@@ -81,6 +81,8 @@
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
<xi:include xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" href="logging.xml" />
|
<xi:include xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" href="logging.xml" />
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<xi:include xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" href="faq.xml" />
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<chapter id="acknowledgements">
|
<chapter id="acknowledgements">
|
||||||
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
|
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user