mirror of
https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/kea
synced 2025-09-03 23:45:27 +00:00
[3873] Fix typos
This commit is contained in:
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
|
|||||||
<section id="q1-generic">
|
<section id="q1-generic">
|
||||||
<title>Where did the Kea name came from?</title>
|
<title>Where did the Kea name came from?</title>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<para>Kea is a name of high mountain parrot living in New Zealand.
|
<para>Kea is the name of a high mountain parrot living in New Zealand.
|
||||||
See this <ulink url="https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/kea-users/2014-October/000032.html" />
|
See this <ulink url="https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/kea-users/2014-October/000032.html" />
|
||||||
for an extended answer.</para>
|
for an extended answer.</para>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
<para>Kea is developed by a small team of engineers. Our resources are
|
<para>Kea is developed by a small team of engineers. Our resources are
|
||||||
limited, so we need to prioritize requests. The complexity of a new
|
limited, so we need to prioritize requests. The complexity of a new
|
||||||
feature (how difficult is it to implement a feature and how likely it
|
feature (how difficult it is to implement a feature and how likely it
|
||||||
would break something that already works), amount of work required and
|
would break something that already works), amount of work required and
|
||||||
expected popularity (i.e. how many users would actually benefit from it)
|
expected popularity (i.e. how many users would actually benefit from it)
|
||||||
are three leading factors. We sometimes also have contractual obligations.
|
are three leading factors. We sometimes also have contractual obligations.
|
||||||
@@ -44,43 +44,43 @@
|
|||||||
implement features that are actively requested first, but the reality
|
implement features that are actively requested first, but the reality
|
||||||
is that we have more requests than we can handle, so some of them must
|
is that we have more requests than we can handle, so some of them must
|
||||||
be postponed, at least in the near future. So is your request likely to
|
be postponed, at least in the near future. So is your request likely to
|
||||||
be reject? Not at all. You can do many things to greatly improve chances
|
be rejected? Not at all. You can do many things to greatly improve the
|
||||||
of your request to be fulfilled. First, it helps to explain why you
|
chances of your request being fulfilled. First, it helps to explain why you
|
||||||
need a feature. If your explanation is reasonable and there are likely
|
need a feature. If your explanation is reasonable and there are likely
|
||||||
other users that would benefit from it, the chances for Kea developers
|
other users that would benefit from it, the chances for Kea developers
|
||||||
to put this task on a roadmap is better. Saying that you are willing
|
to put this task on a roadmap is better. Saying that you are willing
|
||||||
to participate in tests (e.g. test engineering drops when they become
|
to participate in tests (e.g. test engineering drops when they become
|
||||||
available) is also helpful.</para>
|
available) is also helpful.</para>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<para>Another thing you can do to greatly improve chances of a feature
|
<para>Another thing you can do to greatly improve the chances of a feature
|
||||||
to appear is to actually develop it on your own and submit a patch.
|
to appear is to actually develop it on your own and submit a patch.
|
||||||
That's a venue that people often forget about. Kea is an open source
|
That's an avenue that people often forget about. Kea is open source
|
||||||
software and we do accept patches. There are certain requirements, like
|
software and we do accept patches. There are certain requirements, like
|
||||||
code quality, comments, unit-tests, documentation, etc., but we have
|
code quality, comments, unit-tests, documentation, etc., but we have
|
||||||
accepted a significant number of patches in the past, so it's doable.
|
accepted a significant number of patches in the past, so it's doable.
|
||||||
Accepted contributions range from minor documentation corrections to
|
Accepted contributions range from minor documentation corrections to
|
||||||
significant new features, like support for new database type. Before
|
significant new features, like support for a new database type. Before
|
||||||
considering writing and submitting a patch, make sure you read
|
considering writing and submitting a patch, make sure you read
|
||||||
Contributor's Guide in <ulink url="http://git.kea.isc.org/~tester/kea/doxygen/">Kea Developer's Guide</ulink>.
|
the Contributor's Guide in <ulink url="http://git.kea.isc.org/~tester/kea/doxygen/">Kea Developer's Guide</ulink>.
|
||||||
</para>
|
</para>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<para>Kea is developed by ISC, which is non-profit organization.
|
<para>Kea is developed by ISC, which is a non-profit organization.
|
||||||
You may consider signing a development contract with us. In the past
|
You may consider signing a development contract with us. In the past
|
||||||
we did implement certain features due to contractual obligations.
|
we did implement certain features due to contractual obligations.
|
||||||
With additional funds we are able to put extra engineering efforts
|
With additional funds we are able to put extra engineering efforts
|
||||||
into Kea development. We can reshuffle our schedule or add extra
|
into Kea development. We can reshuffle our schedule or add extra
|
||||||
hands to the team if needed. Please keep in mind that Kea is an
|
hands to the team if needed. Please keep in mind that Kea is
|
||||||
open source software and its principal goal is to provide good DHCP
|
open source software and its principle goal is to provide a good DHCP
|
||||||
solution that can be used by everyone. In other words, we may
|
solution that can be used by everyone. In other words, we may
|
||||||
refuse a contract that would tie the solution to specific proprietary
|
refuse a contract that would tie the solution to specific proprietary
|
||||||
technology or make it unusable for other users. Also, we strive to
|
technology or make it unusable for other users. Also, we strive to
|
||||||
make Kea a reference implementation, so if your proposal significantly
|
make Kea a reference implementation, so if your proposal significantly
|
||||||
violates RFC, we may have a problem with that. Nevertheless, please
|
violates a RFC, we may have a problem with that. Nevertheless, please
|
||||||
talk to us and we may be able to find a solution.</para>
|
talk to us and we may be able to find a solution.</para>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<para>Finally, Kea has a <ulink url="http://kea.isc.org/roadmap">public
|
<para>Finally, Kea has a <ulink url="http://kea.isc.org/roadmap">public
|
||||||
roadmap</ulink>, with releases happening several times each year. We tend
|
roadmap</ulink>, with releases happening several times each year. We tend
|
||||||
to not modify features for current milestone, unless there are very good
|
to not modify features for the current milestone, unless there are very good
|
||||||
reasons to do so. Therefore "I'd like a featury X in 6 months" is much
|
reasons to do so. Therefore "I'd like a featury X in 6 months" is much
|
||||||
better received than "I'd like a feature X now".</para>
|
better received than "I'd like a feature X now".</para>
|
||||||
</section>
|
</section>
|
||||||
@@ -91,20 +91,20 @@
|
|||||||
<title>Frequently Asked Questions about DHCPv4</title>
|
<title>Frequently Asked Questions about DHCPv4</title>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<section iq="q1-dhcp4">
|
<section iq="q1-dhcp4">
|
||||||
<title>I set up a firewall, but Kea server still receives the traffic. Why?</title>
|
<title>I set up a firewall, but the Kea server still receives the traffic. Why?</title>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<para>Any DHCPv4 server must be able to receive from and send traffic to the
|
<para>Any DHCPv4 server must be able to receive from and send traffic to
|
||||||
hosts that don't have an IPv4 address assigned yet. That is typically not
|
hosts that don't have an IPv4 address assigned yet. That is typically not
|
||||||
possible with regular UDP sockets, therefore Kea DHCPv4 server uses raw
|
possible with regular UDP sockets, therefore the Kea DHCPv4 server uses raw
|
||||||
sockets by default. Raw sockets mean that the incoming packets are received
|
sockets by default. Raw sockets mean that the incoming packets are received
|
||||||
as raw Ethernet frames, thus bypassing the whole kernel IP stack, including
|
as raw Ethernet frames, thus bypassing the whole kernel IP stack, including
|
||||||
any firewalling rules your kernel may provide.</para>
|
any firewalling rules your kernel may provide.</para>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<para>If you do not want the server to use raw sockets, it is possible to
|
<para>If you do not want the server to use raw sockets, it is possible to
|
||||||
config Kea DHCPv4 server to use UDP sockets instead. See <command>dhcp-socket-type</command>
|
configure the Kea DHCPv4 server to use UDP sockets instead. See <command>dhcp-socket-type</command>
|
||||||
described in <xref linkend="dhcp4-interface-configuration" />. However,
|
described in <xref linkend="dhcp4-interface-configuration" />. However,
|
||||||
using UDP sockets have certain limitations. In particular, it may not allow
|
using UDP sockets has certain limitations. In particular, they may not allow
|
||||||
to send responses directly to the clients without IPv4 addresses assigned.
|
for sending responses directly to clients without IPv4 addresses assigned.
|
||||||
That's ok, if all your traffic is coming through relay agents.</para>
|
That's ok, if all your traffic is coming through relay agents.</para>
|
||||||
</section>
|
</section>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user