Files
libreoffice/extensions/source/propctrlr/eformspropertyhandler.hxx

116 lines
7.0 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

/*************************************************************************
*
* OpenOffice.org - a multi-platform office productivity suite
*
* $RCSfile: eformspropertyhandler.hxx,v $
*
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.4.38); FILE MERGED 2005/11/02 11:43:40 fs 1.4.38.13: #i10000# exception specifications 2005/10/25 07:13:09 fs 1.4.38.12: #i53095# knitting lose ends (amongst others, make the handlers available as service) 2005/10/24 08:41:44 fs 1.4.38.11: start making the handlers full-fledged components, with using a new infrastructure replacing extensions/source/inc/componentmodule.* 2005/10/17 14:09:15 fs 1.4.38.10: #i53095# some cleanup of remaining TODOs 2005/10/13 13:01:01 fs 1.4.38.9: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model 2005/10/11 13:29:05 fs 1.4.38.8: #i53095# phase 3: introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI same open issues as in previous phase (plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\) 2005/10/05 06:54:38 fs 1.4.38.7: RESYNC: (1.4-1.5); FILE MERGED 2005/09/05 07:41:48 fs 1.4.38.6: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives, describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one property known issues: - rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed, which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler. possible solutions: - see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?` - make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call, rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous. 2005/08/18 12:44:27 fs 1.4.38.5: #i53095#, phase 2 moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is now simply managing a set of handlers open issues for making the property browser completely generic: - target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific knowledge - relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService which is not generic - isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM - help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment other open issues: everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends) 2005/08/16 05:38:59 fs 1.4.38.4: #i53095# completely moved the handling of actuating properties into dedicated handlers 2005/08/12 16:30:10 fs 1.4.38.3: - more fine-grained control in the IPropertyBrowserUI which elements to enable or disable - moved designing the SQL command into a dedicated handler - some more reactions on actuating properties move to dedicated handlers - *nearly* completed implementation of the "composed browser UI", which collects and combines UI change requests (IPropertyBrowserUI) (still missing: proper auto-firing) 2005/08/10 15:41:44 fs 1.4.38.2: #i53095# get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked, and move them to a FormComponentHandler [1] still to migrate: - browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler) - handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this 2005/08/09 13:59:57 fs 1.4.38.1: #i53095# phase 1: - don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys - first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties (not yet completed) known regressions over previous phase: - handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions - click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work, thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:21:51 +00:00
* $Revision: 1.6 $
*
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.4.38); FILE MERGED 2005/11/02 11:43:40 fs 1.4.38.13: #i10000# exception specifications 2005/10/25 07:13:09 fs 1.4.38.12: #i53095# knitting lose ends (amongst others, make the handlers available as service) 2005/10/24 08:41:44 fs 1.4.38.11: start making the handlers full-fledged components, with using a new infrastructure replacing extensions/source/inc/componentmodule.* 2005/10/17 14:09:15 fs 1.4.38.10: #i53095# some cleanup of remaining TODOs 2005/10/13 13:01:01 fs 1.4.38.9: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model 2005/10/11 13:29:05 fs 1.4.38.8: #i53095# phase 3: introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI same open issues as in previous phase (plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\) 2005/10/05 06:54:38 fs 1.4.38.7: RESYNC: (1.4-1.5); FILE MERGED 2005/09/05 07:41:48 fs 1.4.38.6: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives, describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one property known issues: - rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed, which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler. possible solutions: - see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?` - make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call, rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous. 2005/08/18 12:44:27 fs 1.4.38.5: #i53095#, phase 2 moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is now simply managing a set of handlers open issues for making the property browser completely generic: - target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific knowledge - relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService which is not generic - isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM - help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment other open issues: everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends) 2005/08/16 05:38:59 fs 1.4.38.4: #i53095# completely moved the handling of actuating properties into dedicated handlers 2005/08/12 16:30:10 fs 1.4.38.3: - more fine-grained control in the IPropertyBrowserUI which elements to enable or disable - moved designing the SQL command into a dedicated handler - some more reactions on actuating properties move to dedicated handlers - *nearly* completed implementation of the "composed browser UI", which collects and combines UI change requests (IPropertyBrowserUI) (still missing: proper auto-firing) 2005/08/10 15:41:44 fs 1.4.38.2: #i53095# get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked, and move them to a FormComponentHandler [1] still to migrate: - browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler) - handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this 2005/08/09 13:59:57 fs 1.4.38.1: #i53095# phase 1: - don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys - first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties (not yet completed) known regressions over previous phase: - handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions - click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work, thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:21:51 +00:00
* last change: $Author: vg $ $Date: 2006-03-14 11:21:51 $
*
* The Contents of this file are made available subject to
* the terms of GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1.
*
*
* GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1
* =============================================
* Copyright 2005 by Sun Microsystems, Inc.
* 901 San Antonio Road, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA
*
* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License version 2.1, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* Lesser General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston,
* MA 02111-1307 USA
*
************************************************************************/
#ifndef EXTENSIONS_SOURCE_PROPCTRLR_EFORMSPROPERTYHANDLER_HXX
#define EXTENSIONS_SOURCE_PROPCTRLR_EFORMSPROPERTYHANDLER_HXX
#ifndef EXTENSIONS_SOURCE_PROPCTRLR_PROPERTYHANDLER_HXX
#include "propertyhandler.hxx"
#endif
/** === begin UNO includes === **/
/** === end UNO includes === **/
#include <memory>
//........................................................................
namespace pcr
{
//........................................................................
class EFormsHelper;
//====================================================================
//= EFormsPropertyHandler
//====================================================================
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.4.38); FILE MERGED 2005/11/02 11:43:40 fs 1.4.38.13: #i10000# exception specifications 2005/10/25 07:13:09 fs 1.4.38.12: #i53095# knitting lose ends (amongst others, make the handlers available as service) 2005/10/24 08:41:44 fs 1.4.38.11: start making the handlers full-fledged components, with using a new infrastructure replacing extensions/source/inc/componentmodule.* 2005/10/17 14:09:15 fs 1.4.38.10: #i53095# some cleanup of remaining TODOs 2005/10/13 13:01:01 fs 1.4.38.9: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model 2005/10/11 13:29:05 fs 1.4.38.8: #i53095# phase 3: introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI same open issues as in previous phase (plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\) 2005/10/05 06:54:38 fs 1.4.38.7: RESYNC: (1.4-1.5); FILE MERGED 2005/09/05 07:41:48 fs 1.4.38.6: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives, describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one property known issues: - rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed, which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler. possible solutions: - see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?` - make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call, rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous. 2005/08/18 12:44:27 fs 1.4.38.5: #i53095#, phase 2 moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is now simply managing a set of handlers open issues for making the property browser completely generic: - target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific knowledge - relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService which is not generic - isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM - help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment other open issues: everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends) 2005/08/16 05:38:59 fs 1.4.38.4: #i53095# completely moved the handling of actuating properties into dedicated handlers 2005/08/12 16:30:10 fs 1.4.38.3: - more fine-grained control in the IPropertyBrowserUI which elements to enable or disable - moved designing the SQL command into a dedicated handler - some more reactions on actuating properties move to dedicated handlers - *nearly* completed implementation of the "composed browser UI", which collects and combines UI change requests (IPropertyBrowserUI) (still missing: proper auto-firing) 2005/08/10 15:41:44 fs 1.4.38.2: #i53095# get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked, and move them to a FormComponentHandler [1] still to migrate: - browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler) - handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this 2005/08/09 13:59:57 fs 1.4.38.1: #i53095# phase 1: - don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys - first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties (not yet completed) known regressions over previous phase: - handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions - click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work, thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:21:51 +00:00
class EFormsPropertyHandler;
typedef HandlerComponentBase< EFormsPropertyHandler > EFormsPropertyHandler_Base;
class EFormsPropertyHandler : public EFormsPropertyHandler_Base
{
private:
::std::auto_ptr< EFormsHelper > m_pHelper;
/** current value of the Model property, if there is no binding, yet
*/
::rtl::OUString m_sBindingLessModelName;
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.4.38); FILE MERGED 2005/11/02 11:43:40 fs 1.4.38.13: #i10000# exception specifications 2005/10/25 07:13:09 fs 1.4.38.12: #i53095# knitting lose ends (amongst others, make the handlers available as service) 2005/10/24 08:41:44 fs 1.4.38.11: start making the handlers full-fledged components, with using a new infrastructure replacing extensions/source/inc/componentmodule.* 2005/10/17 14:09:15 fs 1.4.38.10: #i53095# some cleanup of remaining TODOs 2005/10/13 13:01:01 fs 1.4.38.9: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model 2005/10/11 13:29:05 fs 1.4.38.8: #i53095# phase 3: introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI same open issues as in previous phase (plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\) 2005/10/05 06:54:38 fs 1.4.38.7: RESYNC: (1.4-1.5); FILE MERGED 2005/09/05 07:41:48 fs 1.4.38.6: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives, describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one property known issues: - rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed, which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler. possible solutions: - see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?` - make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call, rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous. 2005/08/18 12:44:27 fs 1.4.38.5: #i53095#, phase 2 moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is now simply managing a set of handlers open issues for making the property browser completely generic: - target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific knowledge - relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService which is not generic - isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM - help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment other open issues: everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends) 2005/08/16 05:38:59 fs 1.4.38.4: #i53095# completely moved the handling of actuating properties into dedicated handlers 2005/08/12 16:30:10 fs 1.4.38.3: - more fine-grained control in the IPropertyBrowserUI which elements to enable or disable - moved designing the SQL command into a dedicated handler - some more reactions on actuating properties move to dedicated handlers - *nearly* completed implementation of the "composed browser UI", which collects and combines UI change requests (IPropertyBrowserUI) (still missing: proper auto-firing) 2005/08/10 15:41:44 fs 1.4.38.2: #i53095# get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked, and move them to a FormComponentHandler [1] still to migrate: - browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler) - handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this 2005/08/09 13:59:57 fs 1.4.38.1: #i53095# phase 1: - don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys - first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties (not yet completed) known regressions over previous phase: - handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions - click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work, thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:21:51 +00:00
/** are we currently simulating a propertyChange event of the Model property?
*/
bool m_bSimulatingModelChange;
public:
EFormsPropertyHandler(
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.4.38); FILE MERGED 2005/11/02 11:43:40 fs 1.4.38.13: #i10000# exception specifications 2005/10/25 07:13:09 fs 1.4.38.12: #i53095# knitting lose ends (amongst others, make the handlers available as service) 2005/10/24 08:41:44 fs 1.4.38.11: start making the handlers full-fledged components, with using a new infrastructure replacing extensions/source/inc/componentmodule.* 2005/10/17 14:09:15 fs 1.4.38.10: #i53095# some cleanup of remaining TODOs 2005/10/13 13:01:01 fs 1.4.38.9: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model 2005/10/11 13:29:05 fs 1.4.38.8: #i53095# phase 3: introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI same open issues as in previous phase (plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\) 2005/10/05 06:54:38 fs 1.4.38.7: RESYNC: (1.4-1.5); FILE MERGED 2005/09/05 07:41:48 fs 1.4.38.6: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives, describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one property known issues: - rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed, which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler. possible solutions: - see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?` - make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call, rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous. 2005/08/18 12:44:27 fs 1.4.38.5: #i53095#, phase 2 moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is now simply managing a set of handlers open issues for making the property browser completely generic: - target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific knowledge - relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService which is not generic - isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM - help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment other open issues: everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends) 2005/08/16 05:38:59 fs 1.4.38.4: #i53095# completely moved the handling of actuating properties into dedicated handlers 2005/08/12 16:30:10 fs 1.4.38.3: - more fine-grained control in the IPropertyBrowserUI which elements to enable or disable - moved designing the SQL command into a dedicated handler - some more reactions on actuating properties move to dedicated handlers - *nearly* completed implementation of the "composed browser UI", which collects and combines UI change requests (IPropertyBrowserUI) (still missing: proper auto-firing) 2005/08/10 15:41:44 fs 1.4.38.2: #i53095# get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked, and move them to a FormComponentHandler [1] still to migrate: - browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler) - handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this 2005/08/09 13:59:57 fs 1.4.38.1: #i53095# phase 1: - don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys - first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties (not yet completed) known regressions over previous phase: - handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions - click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work, thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:21:51 +00:00
const ::com::sun::star::uno::Reference< ::com::sun::star::uno::XComponentContext >& _rxContext
);
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.4.38); FILE MERGED 2005/11/02 11:43:40 fs 1.4.38.13: #i10000# exception specifications 2005/10/25 07:13:09 fs 1.4.38.12: #i53095# knitting lose ends (amongst others, make the handlers available as service) 2005/10/24 08:41:44 fs 1.4.38.11: start making the handlers full-fledged components, with using a new infrastructure replacing extensions/source/inc/componentmodule.* 2005/10/17 14:09:15 fs 1.4.38.10: #i53095# some cleanup of remaining TODOs 2005/10/13 13:01:01 fs 1.4.38.9: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model 2005/10/11 13:29:05 fs 1.4.38.8: #i53095# phase 3: introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI same open issues as in previous phase (plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\) 2005/10/05 06:54:38 fs 1.4.38.7: RESYNC: (1.4-1.5); FILE MERGED 2005/09/05 07:41:48 fs 1.4.38.6: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives, describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one property known issues: - rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed, which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler. possible solutions: - see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?` - make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call, rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous. 2005/08/18 12:44:27 fs 1.4.38.5: #i53095#, phase 2 moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is now simply managing a set of handlers open issues for making the property browser completely generic: - target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific knowledge - relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService which is not generic - isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM - help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment other open issues: everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends) 2005/08/16 05:38:59 fs 1.4.38.4: #i53095# completely moved the handling of actuating properties into dedicated handlers 2005/08/12 16:30:10 fs 1.4.38.3: - more fine-grained control in the IPropertyBrowserUI which elements to enable or disable - moved designing the SQL command into a dedicated handler - some more reactions on actuating properties move to dedicated handlers - *nearly* completed implementation of the "composed browser UI", which collects and combines UI change requests (IPropertyBrowserUI) (still missing: proper auto-firing) 2005/08/10 15:41:44 fs 1.4.38.2: #i53095# get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked, and move them to a FormComponentHandler [1] still to migrate: - browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler) - handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this 2005/08/09 13:59:57 fs 1.4.38.1: #i53095# phase 1: - don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys - first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties (not yet completed) known regressions over previous phase: - handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions - click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work, thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:21:51 +00:00
static ::rtl::OUString SAL_CALL getImplementationName_static( ) throw (::com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException);
static ::com::sun::star::uno::Sequence< ::rtl::OUString > SAL_CALL getSupportedServiceNames_static( ) throw (::com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException);
protected:
~EFormsPropertyHandler();
protected:
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.4.38); FILE MERGED 2005/11/02 11:43:40 fs 1.4.38.13: #i10000# exception specifications 2005/10/25 07:13:09 fs 1.4.38.12: #i53095# knitting lose ends (amongst others, make the handlers available as service) 2005/10/24 08:41:44 fs 1.4.38.11: start making the handlers full-fledged components, with using a new infrastructure replacing extensions/source/inc/componentmodule.* 2005/10/17 14:09:15 fs 1.4.38.10: #i53095# some cleanup of remaining TODOs 2005/10/13 13:01:01 fs 1.4.38.9: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model 2005/10/11 13:29:05 fs 1.4.38.8: #i53095# phase 3: introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI same open issues as in previous phase (plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\) 2005/10/05 06:54:38 fs 1.4.38.7: RESYNC: (1.4-1.5); FILE MERGED 2005/09/05 07:41:48 fs 1.4.38.6: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives, describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one property known issues: - rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed, which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler. possible solutions: - see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?` - make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call, rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous. 2005/08/18 12:44:27 fs 1.4.38.5: #i53095#, phase 2 moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is now simply managing a set of handlers open issues for making the property browser completely generic: - target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific knowledge - relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService which is not generic - isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM - help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment other open issues: everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends) 2005/08/16 05:38:59 fs 1.4.38.4: #i53095# completely moved the handling of actuating properties into dedicated handlers 2005/08/12 16:30:10 fs 1.4.38.3: - more fine-grained control in the IPropertyBrowserUI which elements to enable or disable - moved designing the SQL command into a dedicated handler - some more reactions on actuating properties move to dedicated handlers - *nearly* completed implementation of the "composed browser UI", which collects and combines UI change requests (IPropertyBrowserUI) (still missing: proper auto-firing) 2005/08/10 15:41:44 fs 1.4.38.2: #i53095# get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked, and move them to a FormComponentHandler [1] still to migrate: - browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler) - handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this 2005/08/09 13:59:57 fs 1.4.38.1: #i53095# phase 1: - don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys - first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties (not yet completed) known regressions over previous phase: - handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions - click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work, thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:21:51 +00:00
// XPropertyHandler overriables
virtual ::com::sun::star::uno::Any SAL_CALL getPropertyValue( const ::rtl::OUString& _rPropertyName ) throw (::com::sun::star::beans::UnknownPropertyException, ::com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException);
virtual void SAL_CALL setPropertyValue( const ::rtl::OUString& _rPropertyName, const ::com::sun::star::uno::Any& _rValue ) throw (::com::sun::star::beans::UnknownPropertyException, ::com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException);
virtual ::com::sun::star::uno::Sequence< ::rtl::OUString >
SAL_CALL getActuatingProperties( ) throw (::com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException);
virtual void SAL_CALL describePropertyLine( const ::rtl::OUString& _rPropertyName, ::com::sun::star::inspection::LineDescriptor& /* [out] */ _rDescriptor, const ::com::sun::star::uno::Reference< ::com::sun::star::inspection::XPropertyControlFactory >& _rxControlFactory ) throw (::com::sun::star::beans::UnknownPropertyException, ::com::sun::star::lang::NullPointerException, ::com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException);
virtual ::com::sun::star::inspection::InteractiveSelectionResult
SAL_CALL onInteractivePropertySelection( const ::rtl::OUString& _rPropertyName, sal_Bool _bPrimary, ::com::sun::star::uno::Any& _rData, const ::com::sun::star::uno::Reference< ::com::sun::star::inspection::XObjectInspectorUI >& _rxInspectorUI ) throw (::com::sun::star::beans::UnknownPropertyException, ::com::sun::star::lang::NullPointerException, ::com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException);
virtual void SAL_CALL actuatingPropertyChanged( const ::rtl::OUString& _rActuatingPropertyName, const ::com::sun::star::uno::Any& _rNewValue, const ::com::sun::star::uno::Any& _rOldValue, const ::com::sun::star::uno::Reference< ::com::sun::star::inspection::XObjectInspectorUI >& _rxInspectorUI, sal_Bool ) throw (::com::sun::star::lang::NullPointerException, ::com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException);
virtual ::com::sun::star::uno::Any SAL_CALL convertToPropertyValue( const ::rtl::OUString& _rPropertyName, const ::com::sun::star::uno::Any& _rControlValue ) throw (::com::sun::star::beans::UnknownPropertyException, ::com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException);
virtual ::com::sun::star::uno::Any SAL_CALL convertToControlValue( const ::rtl::OUString& _rPropertyName, const ::com::sun::star::uno::Any& _rPropertyValue, const ::com::sun::star::uno::Type& _rControlValueType ) throw (::com::sun::star::beans::UnknownPropertyException, ::com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException);
virtual void SAL_CALL addPropertyChangeListener( const ::com::sun::star::uno::Reference< ::com::sun::star::beans::XPropertyChangeListener >& _rxListener ) throw (::com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException);
virtual void SAL_CALL removePropertyChangeListener( const ::com::sun::star::uno::Reference< ::com::sun::star::beans::XPropertyChangeListener >& _rxListener ) throw (::com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException);
// PropertyHandler overridables
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.4.38); FILE MERGED 2005/11/02 11:43:40 fs 1.4.38.13: #i10000# exception specifications 2005/10/25 07:13:09 fs 1.4.38.12: #i53095# knitting lose ends (amongst others, make the handlers available as service) 2005/10/24 08:41:44 fs 1.4.38.11: start making the handlers full-fledged components, with using a new infrastructure replacing extensions/source/inc/componentmodule.* 2005/10/17 14:09:15 fs 1.4.38.10: #i53095# some cleanup of remaining TODOs 2005/10/13 13:01:01 fs 1.4.38.9: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model 2005/10/11 13:29:05 fs 1.4.38.8: #i53095# phase 3: introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI same open issues as in previous phase (plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\) 2005/10/05 06:54:38 fs 1.4.38.7: RESYNC: (1.4-1.5); FILE MERGED 2005/09/05 07:41:48 fs 1.4.38.6: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives, describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one property known issues: - rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed, which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler. possible solutions: - see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?` - make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call, rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous. 2005/08/18 12:44:27 fs 1.4.38.5: #i53095#, phase 2 moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is now simply managing a set of handlers open issues for making the property browser completely generic: - target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific knowledge - relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService which is not generic - isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM - help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment other open issues: everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends) 2005/08/16 05:38:59 fs 1.4.38.4: #i53095# completely moved the handling of actuating properties into dedicated handlers 2005/08/12 16:30:10 fs 1.4.38.3: - more fine-grained control in the IPropertyBrowserUI which elements to enable or disable - moved designing the SQL command into a dedicated handler - some more reactions on actuating properties move to dedicated handlers - *nearly* completed implementation of the "composed browser UI", which collects and combines UI change requests (IPropertyBrowserUI) (still missing: proper auto-firing) 2005/08/10 15:41:44 fs 1.4.38.2: #i53095# get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked, and move them to a FormComponentHandler [1] still to migrate: - browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler) - handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this 2005/08/09 13:59:57 fs 1.4.38.1: #i53095# phase 1: - don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys - first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties (not yet completed) known regressions over previous phase: - handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions - click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work, thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:21:51 +00:00
virtual ::com::sun::star::uno::Sequence< ::com::sun::star::beans::Property >
SAL_CALL doDescribeSupportedProperties() const;
virtual void onNewComponent();
protected:
/** returns the value of the PROPERTY_XML_DATA_MODEL property.
An extra method is necessary here, which respects both the value set at our helper,
and <member>m_sBindingLessModelName</member>
*/
::rtl::OUString getModelNamePropertyValue() const;
};
//........................................................................
} // namespace pcr
//........................................................................
#endif // EXTENSIONS_SOURCE_PROPCTRLR_EFORMSPROPERTYHANDLER_HXX