2010-10-27 12:45:03 +01:00
|
|
|
/* -*- Mode: C++; tab-width: 4; indent-tabs-mode: nil; c-basic-offset: 4 -*- */
|
2012-06-21 14:30:25 +01:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* This file is part of the LibreOffice project.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
|
|
|
|
* License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
|
|
|
|
* file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This file incorporates work covered by the following license notice:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
|
|
|
|
* contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed
|
|
|
|
* with this work for additional information regarding copyright
|
|
|
|
* ownership. The ASF licenses this file to you under the Apache
|
|
|
|
* License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file
|
|
|
|
* except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of
|
|
|
|
* the License at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 .
|
|
|
|
*/
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-04-18 20:41:29 +02:00
|
|
|
#ifndef INCLUDED_EXTENSIONS_SOURCE_PROPCTRLR_HANDLERHELPER_HXX
|
|
|
|
#define INCLUDED_EXTENSIONS_SOURCE_PROPCTRLR_HANDLERHELPER_HXX
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <com/sun/star/beans/Property.hpp>
|
|
|
|
#include <com/sun/star/uno/XComponentContext.hpp>
|
|
|
|
#include <com/sun/star/script/XTypeConverter.hpp>
|
|
|
|
#include <com/sun/star/beans/XPropertyChangeListener.hpp>
|
|
|
|
#include <com/sun/star/inspection/XPropertyControlFactory.hpp>
|
|
|
|
#include <com/sun/star/beans/PropertyAttribute.hpp>
|
|
|
|
#include <com/sun/star/beans/Optional.hpp>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <vector>
|
|
|
|
|
2014-09-23 11:20:40 +02:00
|
|
|
namespace vcl { class Window; }
|
2018-09-17 12:59:25 +01:00
|
|
|
namespace weld { class Window; }
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
namespace com { namespace sun { namespace star {
|
|
|
|
namespace inspection {
|
|
|
|
struct LineDescriptor;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} } }
|
2014-02-25 18:36:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
namespace pcr
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
2014-02-25 18:36:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
//= PropertyHandlerHelper
|
2014-02-25 18:36:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
class PropertyHandlerHelper
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
|
|
/** helper for implementing XPropertyHandler::describePropertyLine in a generic way
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void describePropertyLine(
|
2015-09-30 11:48:44 +02:00
|
|
|
const css::beans::Property& _rProperty,
|
|
|
|
css::inspection::LineDescriptor& /* [out] */ _out_rDescriptor,
|
|
|
|
const css::uno::Reference< css::inspection::XPropertyControlFactory >& _rxControlFactory
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/** helper for implementing XPropertyHandler::convertToPropertyValue
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2015-09-30 11:48:44 +02:00
|
|
|
static css::uno::Any convertToPropertyValue(
|
|
|
|
const css::uno::Reference< css::uno::XComponentContext >& _rxContext,
|
|
|
|
const css::uno::Reference< css::script::XTypeConverter >& _rxTypeConverter,
|
|
|
|
const css::beans::Property& _rProperty,
|
|
|
|
const css::uno::Any& _rControlValue
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// helper for implementing XPropertyHandler::convertToControlValue
|
2015-09-30 11:48:44 +02:00
|
|
|
static css::uno::Any convertToControlValue(
|
|
|
|
const css::uno::Reference< css::uno::XComponentContext >& _rxContext,
|
|
|
|
const css::uno::Reference< css::script::XTypeConverter >& _rxTypeConverter,
|
|
|
|
const css::uno::Any& _rPropertyValue,
|
|
|
|
const css::uno::Type& _rControlValueType
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-30 11:48:44 +02:00
|
|
|
/** creates an <member scope="css::inspection">PropertyControlType::ListBox</member>-type control
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
and fills it with initial values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@param _rxControlFactory
|
|
|
|
A control factory. Must not be <NULL/>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@param _rInitialListEntries
|
|
|
|
the initial values of the control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@param _bReadOnlyControl
|
|
|
|
determines whether the control should be read-only
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-13 15:57:59 +00:00
|
|
|
@param _bSorted
|
|
|
|
determines whether the list entries should be sorted
|
|
|
|
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
@return
|
|
|
|
the newly created control
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2015-09-30 11:48:44 +02:00
|
|
|
static css::uno::Reference< css::inspection::XPropertyControl >
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
createListBoxControl(
|
2015-09-30 11:48:44 +02:00
|
|
|
const css::uno::Reference< css::inspection::XPropertyControlFactory >& _rxControlFactory,
|
2017-02-17 19:06:24 +02:00
|
|
|
const std::vector< OUString >& _rInitialListEntries,
|
2014-04-30 11:46:15 +02:00
|
|
|
bool _bReadOnlyControl,
|
|
|
|
bool _bSorted
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
2016-10-12 13:24:04 +01:00
|
|
|
/** creates an <member scope="css::inspection">PropertyControlType::ListBox</member>-type control
|
2018-03-08 10:47:12 +02:00
|
|
|
and fills it with initial values.
|
2016-10-12 13:24:04 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@param _rxControlFactory
|
|
|
|
A control factory. Must not be <NULL/>.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-11 20:56:30 +01:00
|
|
|
@param pTransIds
|
|
|
|
the initial translation ids for the value of the control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@param nElements
|
|
|
|
the count of initial values of the control
|
2016-10-12 13:24:04 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@param _bReadOnlyControl
|
|
|
|
determines whether the control should be read-only
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@return
|
|
|
|
the newly created control
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static css::uno::Reference< css::inspection::XPropertyControl >
|
|
|
|
createListBoxControl(
|
|
|
|
const css::uno::Reference< css::inspection::XPropertyControlFactory >& _rxControlFactory,
|
2017-06-11 20:56:30 +01:00
|
|
|
const char** pTransIds, size_t nElements,
|
2018-03-08 10:47:12 +02:00
|
|
|
bool _bReadOnlyControl
|
2016-10-12 13:24:04 +01:00
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-30 11:48:44 +02:00
|
|
|
/** creates an <member scope="css::inspection">PropertyControlType::ComboBox</member>-type control
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
and fills it with initial values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@param _rxControlFactory
|
|
|
|
A control factory. Must not be <NULL/>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@param _rInitialListEntries
|
|
|
|
the initial values of the control
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-13 15:57:59 +00:00
|
|
|
@param _bSorted
|
|
|
|
determines whether the list entries should be sorted
|
|
|
|
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
@return
|
|
|
|
the newly created control
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2015-09-30 11:48:44 +02:00
|
|
|
static css::uno::Reference< css::inspection::XPropertyControl >
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
createComboBoxControl(
|
2015-09-30 11:48:44 +02:00
|
|
|
const css::uno::Reference< css::inspection::XPropertyControlFactory >& _rxControlFactory,
|
2017-02-17 19:06:24 +02:00
|
|
|
const std::vector< OUString >& _rInitialListEntries,
|
2014-04-30 11:46:15 +02:00
|
|
|
bool _bSorted
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-30 11:48:44 +02:00
|
|
|
/** creates an <member scope="css::inspection">PropertyControlType::NumericField</member>-type control
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
and initializes it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@param _rxControlFactory
|
|
|
|
A control factory. Must not be <NULL/>.
|
|
|
|
@param _nDigits
|
|
|
|
number of decimal digits for the control
|
2015-09-30 11:48:44 +02:00
|
|
|
(<member scope="css::inspection">XNumericControl::DecimalDigits</member>)
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
@param _rMinValue
|
|
|
|
minimum value which can be entered in the control
|
2015-09-30 11:48:44 +02:00
|
|
|
(<member scope="css::inspection">XNumericControl::MinValue</member>)
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
@param _rMaxValue
|
|
|
|
maximum value which can be entered in the control
|
2015-09-30 11:48:44 +02:00
|
|
|
(<member scope="css::inspection">XNumericControl::MaxValue</member>)
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@return
|
|
|
|
the newly created control
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2015-09-30 11:48:44 +02:00
|
|
|
static css::uno::Reference< css::inspection::XPropertyControl >
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
createNumericControl(
|
2015-09-30 11:48:44 +02:00
|
|
|
const css::uno::Reference< css::inspection::XPropertyControlFactory >& _rxControlFactory,
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
sal_Int16 _nDigits,
|
2015-09-30 11:48:44 +02:00
|
|
|
const css::beans::Optional< double >& _rMinValue,
|
2018-03-08 10:47:12 +02:00
|
|
|
const css::beans::Optional< double >& _rMaxValue
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/** marks the document passed in our UNO context as modified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The method looks up a value called "ContextDocument" in the given UNO component context,
|
2015-09-30 11:48:44 +02:00
|
|
|
queries it for the ->css::util::XModifiable interface, and calls its
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
setModified method. If either of those steps fails, this is asserted in a non-product
|
|
|
|
version, and silently ignore otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@param _rContext
|
|
|
|
the component context which was used to create the component calling this method
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void setContextDocumentModified(
|
2013-06-03 15:34:00 +02:00
|
|
|
const css::uno::Reference< css::uno::XComponentContext > & _rContext
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-03 15:34:00 +02:00
|
|
|
static css::uno::Reference< css::uno::XInterface > getContextDocument( const css::uno::Reference<css::uno::XComponentContext> & _rContext );
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-19 17:57:50 +01:00
|
|
|
/// @throws css::uno::RuntimeException
|
2017-01-26 12:28:58 +01:00
|
|
|
static css::uno::Reference< css::uno::XInterface > getContextDocument_throw( const css::uno::Reference<css::uno::XComponentContext> & _rContext );
|
2013-06-03 15:34:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 21:24:53 +00:00
|
|
|
/** gets the window of the ObjectInspector in which a property handler lives
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-09 22:55:28 +01:00
|
|
|
The method looks up a value called "DialogParentWindow" in the given UNO component context,
|
2014-09-23 11:20:40 +02:00
|
|
|
queries it for XWindow, and returns the respective vcl::Window*. If either of those steps fails,
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
this is asserted in a non-product version, and silently ignore otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@param _rContext
|
|
|
|
the component context which was used to create the component calling this method
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2014-09-23 11:20:40 +02:00
|
|
|
static vcl::Window* getDialogParentWindow( const css::uno::Reference< css::uno::XComponentContext > & _rContext );
|
2018-09-17 12:59:25 +01:00
|
|
|
static weld::Window* getDialogParentFrame( const css::uno::Reference< css::uno::XComponentContext > & _rContext );
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/** determines whether given PropertyAttributes require a to-be-created
|
2015-09-30 11:48:44 +02:00
|
|
|
<type scope="css::inspection">XPropertyControl</type> to be read-only
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@param _nPropertyAttributes
|
|
|
|
the attributes of the property which should be reflected by a to-be-created
|
2015-09-30 11:48:44 +02:00
|
|
|
<type scope="css::inspection">XPropertyControl</type>
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2017-03-03 20:57:02 +01:00
|
|
|
static bool requiresReadOnlyControl( sal_Int16 _nPropertyAttributes )
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2015-09-30 11:48:44 +02:00
|
|
|
return ( _nPropertyAttributes & css::beans::PropertyAttribute::READONLY ) != 0;
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
private:
|
2015-10-12 15:25:41 +02:00
|
|
|
PropertyHandlerHelper( const PropertyHandlerHelper& ) = delete;
|
|
|
|
PropertyHandlerHelper& operator=( const PropertyHandlerHelper& ) = delete;
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2014-02-25 18:36:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
} // namespace pcr
|
2014-02-25 18:36:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-04-18 20:41:29 +02:00
|
|
|
#endif // INCLUDED_EXTENSIONS_SOURCE_PROPCTRLR_HANDLERHELPER_HXX
|
INTEGRATION: CWS pbrwuno (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2005/10/17 13:19:02 fs 1.1.2.7: #i53095# proper listener administration: allow multiple listeners per handler
2005/10/13 13:01:05 fs 1.1.2.6: #i53095# introduce an XObjectInspector/Model
2005/10/11 13:29:25 fs 1.1.2.5: #i53095# phase 3:
introduced XPropertyHandler and XObjectInspectorUI
same open issues as in previous phase
(plus probably some more, since not everything is tested, yet :-\)
2005/09/05 07:41:51 fs 1.1.2.4: #i53095# phase 3, part 1: introduced XPropertyControl and relatives,
describing one control in the ObjectInspector, responsible for one
property
known issues:
- rebuildPropertyUI can cause problems now: If the user clicks into
the control for property A, which causes property B to be committed,
which causes the UI for property A to be rebuilt, then this will
crash currently. Reason: rebuildPropertyUI now synchronously replaces
the VCL-Window of the rebuilt control, which is exactly the one
which is still in some MouseButtonDown-handler.
possible solutions:
- see if rebuiltPropertyUI can be obsoleted - handlers should be able
to just obtain the XPropertyControl from the PropertyUI, and
re-initialize the control. Shouldn't they?`
- make one of the steps in the chain (mouse-click, handler-call,
rebuildPropertyUI-callback) asynchronous.
2005/08/18 12:44:31 fs 1.1.2.3: #i53095#, phase 2
moved (nearly) all property handling to dedicated handlers, the controller is
now simply managing a set of handlers
open issues for making the property browser completely generic:
- target page for a property - at the moment, the pbrw uses form-specific
knowledge
- relative position of properties. Again, the pbrw uses the OPropertyInfoService
which is not generic
- isComposeable for a given property. Also OPropertyInfoService-dependent ATM
- help ids of pages and the pbrw as a whole. They're hard-coded at the moment
other open issues:
everything in the code which is tagged with TOD/UNOize. Those are items which
do not immediately hinder phase 3 (real UNOization, i.e. definition of new
UNO interfaces for the handlers, the controller, and so on), but need to be
addressed in phase 4 (knit lose ends)
2005/08/10 15:41:46 fs 1.1.2.2: #i53095#
get rid of nearly all [1] the implementations in OPropertyBrowserController::Clicked,
and move them to a FormComponentHandler
[1] still to migrate:
- browsing for events (needs a dedicated event property handler)
- handling for clicking the button of the Command property - this
is kind of asynchronous, and IPropertyHandler is not yet prepared for this
2005/08/09 14:00:03 fs 1.1.2.1: #i53095# phase 1:
- don't use strings to transver values between controls and introspectee, but Anys
- first version of a dedicated property handler for form-component-related properties
(not yet completed)
known regressions over previous phase:
- handlers for events not yet implemented, thus some assertions
- click handlers for form-component-related properties do not yet work,
thus the browse buttons mostly do not work
2006-03-14 10:25:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2010-10-27 12:45:03 +01:00
|
|
|
/* vim:set shiftwidth=4 softtabstop=4 expandtab: */
|