...and remove some unncessary using directives/declarations, in preparation of
removing now-unnecessary #includes from cppumaker-generated files, post
e57ca02849c3d87142ff5ff9099a212e72b8139c "Remove dynamic exception
specifications".
Change-Id: Iaf1f268871e2ee1d1c76cf90f03557527ebc9067
...(for now, from LIBO_INTERNAL_CODE only). See the mail thread starting at
<https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2017-January/076665.html>
"Dynamic Exception Specifications" for details.
Most changes have been done automatically by the rewriting loplugin:dynexcspec
(after enabling the rewriting mode, to be committed shortly). The way it only
removes exception specs from declarations if it also sees a definition, it
identified some dead declarations-w/o-definitions (that have been removed
manually) and some cases where a definition appeared in multiple include files
(which have also been cleaned up manually). There's also been cases of macro
paramters (that were used to abstract over exception specs) that have become
unused now (and been removed).
Furthermore, some code needed to be cleaned up manually
(avmedia/source/quicktime/ and connectivity/source/drivers/kab/), as I had no
configurations available that would actually build that code. Missing @throws
documentation has not been applied in such manual clean-up.
Change-Id: I3408691256c9b0c12bc5332de976743626e13960
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/33574
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
no need to hold both raw pointer and a uno::Reference to the same object
Change-Id: I6aa2b2e259aed77ab038fc72a3ece7165e477f50
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/33163
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
The issue of 362d4f0cd4e50111edfae9d30c90602c37ed65a2 "Explicitly mark
overriding destructors as 'virtual'" appears to no longer be a problem with
MSVC 2013.
(The little change in the rewriting code of compilerplugins/clang/override.cxx
was necessary to prevent an endless loop when adding "override" to
OOO_DLLPUBLIC_CHARTTOOLS virtual ~CloseableLifeTimeManager();
in chart2/source/inc/LifeTime.hxx, getting stuck in the leading
OOO_DLLPUBLIC_CHARTTOOLS macro. Can't remember what that
isAtEndOfImmediateMacroExpansion thing was originally necessary for, anyway.)
Change-Id: I534c634504d7216b9bb632c2775c04eaf27e927e
uno::Reference is only allowed to used with classes that have a
::static_type member.
So convert all those places to rtl::Reference.
Maybe we need some LIBO_INTERNAL_ONLY constructors on rtl::Reference and
uno::Reference to make this a little smoother?
Change-Id: Icdcb35d71ca40a87b1dc474096776412adbfc7e3
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/25516
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
This was a feature requested by mmeeks, as a result of
tdf#92611.
It validates that things that extend XInterface are not
directly heap/stack-allocated, but have their lifecycle managed
via css::uno::Reference or rtl::Reference.
Change-Id: I28e3b8b236f6a4a56d0a6d6f26ad54e44b36e692
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/16924
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
...to avoid lots of loplugin:staticmethods warnings. Also enables DBG_ASSERT
etc. also for --enable-debug builds in addition to --enable-dbgutil builds.
Change-Id: Ib89ecd9ab8ce7abb2c64790ace248b31f9d2b64d
Idea from bubli - look for loops where the index variable is of such
size that it cannot cover the range revealed by examining the length
part of the condition.
So far, I have only run the plugin up till the VCL module.
Also the plugin deliberately excludes anything more complicated than a
straightforward incrementing for loop.
Change-Id: Ifced18b01c03ea537c64168465ce0b8287a42015
It looks like the cleanest method of getting lok_init into
a LibreOfficeKitInit.h header (in a c89 compatible way) is to
have it as a static function.
(inline is only available in C99 or later -- this is actually
available on Linux which is the only place that we can actually
use lok_init anyways currently, however given we have to keep
c89 for the C code (for MSVC) compatibility, selectively enabling
c99 would likely be more messy.)
Conflicts:
libreofficekit/Module_libreofficekit.mk
Change-Id: I0493e7a68ed5397479220bb6ba8c3db870b6dd32
It turns out that almost none of them were necessary.
Change-Id: I1311ed28409c682b57ea8d149bcbaf2c49133e83
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/12133
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
