so we can remove unnecessary calls to the OUString(literal) constructor
when calling constructors like this:
Foo(OUString("xxx"), 1)
Change-Id: I1de60ef561437c86b27dc9cb095a5deb2e103b36
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/33698
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
to look for inline&empty destructors, where we can just let
the compiler do it's thing
Change-Id: Ibde8800bdfed6b77649c30ebc19921167c33dec3
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/32999
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
For some reason, e.g. Clang 3.8.1 doesn't evaluate std::strlen here (though it
apparently does in other places in this file).
Change-Id: Ib2b7dcc1d7b6ae47ef285bd2edb65e399dc11b79
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/33547
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
Inspired by a recent bug report where we were assigning the result
of VclPtr<T>::Create to a raw pointer.
As a consequence, we also need to change various methods that were
returning newly created Window subclasses via raw pointer, to
instead return those via VclPtr
Change-Id: I8118e0195a5b2b4780e646cfb0e151692e54ae2b
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/31318
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
...to catch new places where defined'ness of OSL_BIG/LITENDIAN would be checked
without osl/endian.h being included; cf.
e2f08f9def0869460ad38a1c2adb450778290f6e "connectivity, sc: add missing #include
<osl/endian.h>" and 2b14fb3a4f92b928f0a5fc536c6a5f4a6e51a9b8 "cppcanvas, oox:
add missing #include <osl/endian.h>".
Change-Id: I167c8916a01391b7dacad7325153ccf35d3ba9dc
...other options to avoid such irrelevant warnings can be to move code to an
include file and/or to define a dummy main() accessing otherwise unreferenced
entities.
Change-Id: Ifd44e376b35ef68496f3aba6a3c046d684824000
look for final classes, and make sure they don't have protected members
Change-Id: I1fa810659bba02b61a5160dbfd8e24185ec9abf4
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/30895
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
...to check that loplugin produces warnings/errors as expected:
* Clang has a -verify switch that makes it easy to write test input .cxx files
that list in comments all the warnings/errors that are expected, and let Clang
check those expectations instead of generating object code. See
include/clang/Frontend/VerifyDiagnosticConsumer.h in the Clang source tree for
documentation.
* Introduce a CompilerTest gbuild class that uses the existing LinkTarget class
as much as possible. Checking the input files is implicitly phony, as the
compilation step doesn't generate any object files, and the link step does
nothing because there is no gb_LinkTarget_set_targettype for CompilerTest.
The setup at least works for Clang on Linux (will need adaptions for Clang on
Windows; compilers other than Clang are not relevant for now given this is
used to check compilerplugins).
* Definition of gb_CFLAGS_WERROR in solenv/gbuild/platform/com_GCC_defs.mk needs
to be lazy ('=' vs. ':=') so that CompilerTest can override it: The Clang
-verify mode wants the input files to specify whether the loplugin diagnostics
are warnings or errros, so they consistently need to be errors independent of
--enable-werror configuration.
* A first (example) test is in compilerplugins/clang/test/salbool.cxx. The
corresponding gbuild CompilerTest instance is in
solenv/CompilerTest_compilerplugins_clang.mk for now. The reason for that odd
split across compilerplugins/ and solenv/ is that there is no
compilerplugins/Modules_compilerplugins.mk file, so this setup is the easiest
hack for now (to be cleaned up). (Another area that could be improved is that
all test files need to be listed explicitly in the CompilerTest_*.mk file,
instead of, say, using all .c/.cxx/.m/.mm files in a specified directory.)
* The test is run somewhat late during a top-level 'make', after loplugin has
already been used in compilation. But it can be run manually (e.g., 'make
solenv') when making changes to loplugin during development.
Change-Id: I01e12fb84887d264ac03ef2484807458c2075af4