...from function definitions occurring within class definitions. Done with
a rewriting Clang plugin (to be pushed later).
Change-Id: I9c6f2818a57ccdb361548895a7743107cbacdff8
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/34874
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
The issue of 362d4f0cd4 "Explicitly mark
overriding destructors as 'virtual'" appears to no longer be a problem with
MSVC 2013.
(The little change in the rewriting code of compilerplugins/clang/override.cxx
was necessary to prevent an endless loop when adding "override" to
OOO_DLLPUBLIC_CHARTTOOLS virtual ~CloseableLifeTimeManager();
in chart2/source/inc/LifeTime.hxx, getting stuck in the leading
OOO_DLLPUBLIC_CHARTTOOLS macro. Can't remember what that
isAtEndOfImmediateMacroExpansion thing was originally necessary for, anyway.)
Change-Id: I534c634504d7216b9bb632c2775c04eaf27e927e
Searched source for using declarations.
Checked if those symbols reappear in the source file,
even in comments or dead code but not in #include statements.
If they don't reappear, remove the declaration.
Remove includes whose symbol got removed.
Change-Id: Ibb77163f63c1120070e9518e3dc0a78c6c59fab0
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/24148
Reviewed-by: Jochen Nitschke <j.nitschke+logerrit@ok.de>
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
It appears that the C++ standard allows overriding destructors to be marked
"override," but at least some MSVC versions complain about it, so at least make
sure such destructors are explicitly marked "virtual."
Change-Id: I0e1cafa7584fd16ebdce61f569eae2373a71b0a1
...mostly done with a rewriting Clang plugin, with just some manual tweaking
necessary to fix poor macro usage.
Change-Id: Ie656f9d653fc716f72ac175925272696d509038f
Compiler plugin to replace with matching number(), boolean() or OUString ctor,
ran it, few manual tweaks, mark as really deprecated.
Change-Id: I4a79bdbcf4c460d21e73b635d2bd3725c22876b2
This reverts commit 6c61b20a8d. As discussed at
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2013-May/052449.html> "Re:
fdo#46808, Convert awt::UnoControlDialogModel to new style problem" why the odd
change in 2e2a4827ce "scripting: get
CreateUnoDialog() work again" appears to fix things again:
The problem is that the implementation of the css.awt.UnoControlDialogModel
involves UNO aggregation
(IMPL_CREATE_INSTANCE_WITH_GEOMETRY(UnoControlDialogModel) in
toolkit/soruce/helper/registerservices.cxx creating a
OGeometryControlModel<UnoControlDialogModel> instance that aggregates a
UnoControlDialogModel instance). That means that queryInterface can return a
reference to something that is technically a different object, and that's
what's happening here, and explains why calling setPropertyValue in two
different ways on what logically appears to be a single object can end up
calling two different implementations (of two different physical objects).
(UNO aggregation is known to be broken and should not be used. Nevertheless,
there's still code that does---code that is a horrible mess and hard to clean
up.)
That all this worked as intended in the past is just sheer luck, but any
way of substantially touching it is asking for trouble. I'm going to
revert 6c61b20a8d again.
I wasn't able to revert without also reverting
be50ad28f5 "fdo#46808, Convert
awt::XUnoControlDialog to new style," as the two were tightly dependant. Also
reverts all the follow-up fixes cb4b6dde8f
"-Werror,-Wuninitialized" (sans the const-ness fix in
UpdateHandler::insertControlModel), 697a007c61
"Fix exception specifications," 2ce6828bbb "fix
awt::UnoControlModelDialog crash," and 2e2a4827ce
"scripting: get CreateUnoDialog() work again."
Conflicts:
basctl/source/dlged/dlged.cxx
filter/source/t602/t602filter.cxx
xmlscript/test/imexp.cxx
Change-Id: I5d133468062f3ca36300db52fbd699be1ac72998
