mirror of
https://github.com/lm-sensors/lm-sensors
synced 2025-09-05 16:55:45 +00:00
Update 4.7 What are VID lines? Why is the VID reading wrong? git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk@2608 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
1531 lines
60 KiB
Plaintext
1531 lines
60 KiB
Plaintext
Short Contents
|
|
**************
|
|
|
|
lm_sensors
|
|
1 PC and Sensor Overview
|
|
2 Sensor and Bus Basics
|
|
3 Installation and Management
|
|
4 Problems
|
|
5 How to Ask for Help
|
|
6 How to Contribute
|
|
7 Version 1 Specific Questions
|
|
Appendix A Revision History of This Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents
|
|
*****************
|
|
|
|
lm_sensors
|
|
1 PC and Sensor Overview
|
|
1.1 What sensors are available on my PC?
|
|
1.2 What can a sensor chip like the "LM78" do?
|
|
1.3 Where do I find out more about any of these chips?
|
|
2 Sensor and Bus Basics
|
|
2.1 How are these sensors read?
|
|
2.2 What is the SMBus? And the I2C bus?
|
|
2.3 I don't have an ISA bus!
|
|
2.4 What sensors do processors have?
|
|
2.5 How often are the sensor values updated?
|
|
2.6 How are alarms triggered?
|
|
3 Installation and Management
|
|
3.1 Why so many modules, and how do I cope with them?
|
|
3.2 How do I know which chips I own?
|
|
3.2.1 What chips are on motherboard XYZ?
|
|
3.2.2 Do you support motherboard XYZ?
|
|
3.2.3 Do you support chip XYZ?
|
|
3.2.4 Anybody working on a driver for chip XYZ?
|
|
3.3 Which modules should I insert?
|
|
3.4 Do I need the configuration file `/etc/sensors.conf'?
|
|
3.4.1 The labels for the voltage and temperature readings in `sensors' are incorrect!
|
|
3.4.2 The min and max for the readings in `sensors' are incorrect!
|
|
3.4.3 The min and max settings in `/etc/sensors.conf' didn't take effect!
|
|
3.4.4 One sensor isn't hooked up on my board!
|
|
3.4.5 I need help with `sensors.conf'!
|
|
3.4.6 Do you have a database of `sensors.conf' entries for specific boards?
|
|
3.5 What about the `No such file or directory' warnings when I compile?
|
|
3.6 I get all kinds of weird compilation errors?
|
|
3.6.1 `No rule to make target xxxx needed by xxxx' - how to fix?
|
|
3.7 It still does not compile or patch!
|
|
3.8 `make install' fails on Mandrake kernels
|
|
3.9 I get unresolved symbols when I `modprobe' modules (Red Hat especially)
|
|
3.10 I2C_DRIVERID_ADM1024 undefined (Red Hat especially)
|
|
4 Problems
|
|
4.1 My fans report exactly half/double their values compared to the BIOS?
|
|
4.1.1 Fans sometimes/always read 0!!
|
|
4.1.2 I doubled the fan divisor and the fan still reads 7000!
|
|
4.2 Why do my two LM75's report "-48 degrees"?
|
|
4.3 Why do I have two Vcore readings, I have only one processor!
|
|
4.4 How do those ALARMS work? The current value is within range but there is still an ALARM warning!
|
|
4.5 My voltage readings seem to drift a bit. Is something wrong?
|
|
4.6 Some measurements are way out of range. What happened?
|
|
4.6.1 -5V and -12V readings are way out of range!
|
|
4.7 What are VID lines? Why is the VID reading wrong?
|
|
4.8 I read sensor values several times a second, but they are only updated only each second or so. Why?
|
|
4.9 It sometimes seems to take almost a second before I see the sensor reading results. Why?
|
|
4.10 Can I be alerted when an ALARM occurs?
|
|
4.11 SMBus transactions on my PIIX4 simply don't work (timeouts happen). Why?
|
|
4.12 My BIOS reports a much higher CPU temperature than your modules!
|
|
4.13 I try to read the raw `/proc' files, but the values are strange?!?
|
|
4.14 How do I set new limits?
|
|
4.14.1 I set new limits and it didn't work?
|
|
4.15 Some sensors are doubly detected?
|
|
4.16 I ran sensors-detect, but now I get very strange readings?!?
|
|
4.17 Bad readings from particular chips
|
|
4.17.1 Bad readings from the AS99127F!
|
|
4.17.2 Bad readings from the VIA 686A!
|
|
4.17.3 Bad readings from the MTP008!
|
|
4.17.4 Bad temperature readings from the SIS5595!
|
|
4.17.5 Bad readings from a w8378[12]d!
|
|
4.17.6 Bus hangs on Ali 1543 on Asus P5A boards!
|
|
4.17.7 Bad readings from LM75!
|
|
4.17.8 Bad readings from LM78!
|
|
4.17.9 Bad readings from LM80!
|
|
4.17.10 Bad readings from it87!
|
|
4.18 How do I configure two chips (LM87) differently?
|
|
4.19 Dmesg says `Upgrade BIOS'! I don't want to!
|
|
4.19.1 Dmesg says `use force_addr=0xaddr'! What address do I use?
|
|
4.20 Sensors says `Can't access procfs/sysfs file'
|
|
4.21 Sensors says `No sensors found!'
|
|
4.22 Sensors output is not correct!
|
|
4.23 What is at I2C address XXX?
|
|
4.23.1 What is at I2C address 0x69?
|
|
4.23.2 What is at I2C addresses 0x50 - 0x57?
|
|
4.23.3 What is at I2C addresses 0x30 - 0x37?
|
|
4.24 Sensors-detect doesn't work at all
|
|
4.24.1 Sensors-detect says "Couldn't open /proc/bus/i2c?!?"
|
|
4.24.2 Sensors-detect says "Can't open /dev/i2c[-/]0"
|
|
4.24.3 Sensors-detect doesn't find any sensors!
|
|
4.25 Sensors says `Error: Line xxx: zzzzzzz'
|
|
4.26 Sensors only gives the name, adapter, and algorithm for my chip
|
|
4.27 Sensors says `ERROR: Can't get xxxxx data!'
|
|
4.28 Sensors doesn't find any sensors, just eeproms.
|
|
4.29 Inserting modules hangs my board
|
|
4.30 Inserting modules slows down my board
|
|
4.31 Problems on particular motherboards
|
|
4.31.1 Asus P4B
|
|
4.31.2 Tyan 2460, 2462
|
|
4.31.3 Tyan 2466
|
|
4.31.4 Tyan 2688
|
|
4.32 Problems on particular systems
|
|
4.33 Problems on 2.6 kernels
|
|
5 How to Ask for Help
|
|
5.1 What to send us when asking for help
|
|
5.2 What to do if a module won't insert?
|
|
5.3 What to do if it inserts, but nothing happens?
|
|
5.4 What to do if I read only bogus information?
|
|
5.5 What to do if you have other problems?
|
|
5.6 What if it just works like a charm?
|
|
5.7 How do I update a ticket?
|
|
5.8 How do I follow up on a ticket?
|
|
6 How to Contribute
|
|
6.1 How to write a driver
|
|
6.2 How to get CVS access
|
|
6.3 How to donate hardware to the project
|
|
6.4 How to join the project mailing list
|
|
6.5 How to access mailing list archives
|
|
6.6 How to submit a patch
|
|
6.7 How to REALLY help
|
|
6.8 How to get release announcements
|
|
6.9 How to block spam on the project mailing list
|
|
7 Version 1 Specific Questions
|
|
7.1 My manufacturer swears that my mainboard has an SMBus, but your code reports that it can't find it. What's wrong?
|
|
7.2 The modules won't load, saying 'SMBus not detected'.
|
|
7.3 I try to read `/proc/sensors', and I get a "No sensor data yet (try again in a few moments)" message. Why?
|
|
7.4 On my Dell, a LM80 is detected, but all readings are 0!
|
|
Appendix A Revision History of This Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
lm_sensors
|
|
**********
|
|
|
|
The lm_sensors package includes a collection of modules for general
|
|
SMBus access and hardware monitoring. NOTE: this requires special
|
|
support which is not in standard 2.2-vintage kernels.
|
|
|
|
1 PC and Sensor Overview
|
|
************************
|
|
|
|
1.1 What sensors are available on my PC?
|
|
========================================
|
|
|
|
Most PC's built since late 1997 now come with a hardware health
|
|
monitoring chip. This chip may be accessed via the ISA bus or the
|
|
SMBus, depending on the motherboard.
|
|
|
|
Some motherboard chipsets, notably the Via 686 and the SiS 5595,
|
|
contain hardware monitor functions.
|
|
|
|
This FAQ frequently refers to the "LM78". This chip has been
|
|
obsoleted by National Semiconductor. Most motherboards today contain a
|
|
chip with similar functions.
|
|
|
|
1.2 What can a sensor chip like the "LM78" do?
|
|
==============================================
|
|
|
|
The LM78 is a chip made by National Semiconductor which can monitor 7
|
|
voltages (5 positive, 2 negative) from 0 to 4.08V. The inputs are
|
|
usually in series with voltage dividers which lower the +/- 12V and +/-
|
|
5V supplies to measurable range. Therefore, the readings for such
|
|
inputs need to be re-scaled appropriately by software.
|
|
|
|
The LM78 also has 3 fan speed monitoring inputs, an internal
|
|
temperature sensor, a chassis intrusion sensor, and a couple maskable
|
|
interrupt inputs. The LM78 can also relay the processor's (P6 or Pent
|
|
II) VID lines which are hardwired and used to indicate to the power
|
|
regulator (usually on the mainboard close to the processor socket/slot)
|
|
what voltage to supply to the processor.
|
|
|
|
The LM78 can be interfaced to a system via the ISA bus and/or the
|
|
SMBus.
|
|
|
|
Most other sensor chips have comparable functionality. Each supported
|
|
chip is documented in the `doc/chips' directory.
|
|
|
|
1.3 Where do I find out more about any of these chips?
|
|
======================================================
|
|
|
|
Most semiconductor companies have comprehensive documentation,
|
|
including complete datasheets, on their websites. Analog Devices,
|
|
Dallas Semiconductor, Maxim, and National Semiconductor have the widest
|
|
selection of sensor chips. Their websites are:
|
|
|
|
* `http://www.analog.com'
|
|
|
|
* `http://www.dalsemi.com'
|
|
|
|
* `http://www.maxim-ic.com'
|
|
|
|
* `http://www.national.com'
|
|
|
|
Please see the file
|
|
`http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/useful_addresses.html' for links to
|
|
other companies' websites.
|
|
|
|
2 Sensor and Bus Basics
|
|
***********************
|
|
|
|
2.1 How are these sensors read?
|
|
===============================
|
|
|
|
Sensor chips reside on either the ISA bus, the SMBus, or both. See the
|
|
file `doc/chips/SUMMARY' in our package for a list.
|
|
|
|
To communicate with chips on the ISA bus, the software uses simple
|
|
I/O reads and writes.
|
|
|
|
To communicate with chips on the SMBus, the software must use an
|
|
SMBus interface device, explained below.
|
|
|
|
2.2 What is the SMBus? And the I2C bus?
|
|
=======================================
|
|
|
|
The SMBus is the "System Management Bus". More specifically, it is a
|
|
2-wire, low-speed serial communication bus used for basic health
|
|
monitoring and hardware management. It is a specific implementation of
|
|
the more general I2C (pronunciation: I-squared-C) bus. In fact, both
|
|
I2C devices and SMBus devices may be connected to the same (I2C) bus.
|
|
|
|
The SMBus (or I2C bus) starts at the host controller, used for
|
|
starting transactions on the SMBus. From the host interface, the
|
|
devices communicated with are the "slave" devices. Each slave device
|
|
has a unique 7-bit address which the host uses to refer to that device.
|
|
|
|
For each supported SMBus host, there is a separate kernel module
|
|
which implements the communication protocol with the host. Some SMBus
|
|
hosts really operate on the SMBus level; these hosts can not cope with
|
|
pure I2C devices. Other hosts are in fact I2C hosts: in this case, we
|
|
implement the SMBus protocol in terms of I2C operations. But these
|
|
hosts can also talk to pure I2C devices.
|
|
|
|
2.3 I don't have an ISA bus!
|
|
============================
|
|
|
|
We promise, you do, even if you don't have any old ISA slots. The "ISA
|
|
Bus" exists in your computer even if you don't have ISA slots; it is
|
|
simply a memory-mapped area, 64KB in size (0x0000 - 0xFFFF) where many
|
|
"legacy" functions, such as keyboard and interrupt controllers, are
|
|
found. It isn't necessarily a separate physical bus. See the file
|
|
`/proc/ioports' for a list of devices living on the "ISA Bus" in your
|
|
system. If you don't like the term "ISA Bus" think "I/O Space".
|
|
|
|
2.4 What sensors do processors have?
|
|
====================================
|
|
|
|
Most new processors contain a thermal diode on the die itself. The
|
|
electical properties of all diodes and transistors vary slightly with
|
|
temperature. The thermal diode is exceptionally accurate because it is
|
|
directly on the die. Newer temperature sensor chips, like the Analog
|
|
Devices ADM1021 and clones, and the Winbond chips, have circuitry for
|
|
measuring the the electrical properties of an external diode and
|
|
converting this data to a temperature. Any sensor chip listed in
|
|
`doc/chips/SUMMARY' in our package which has support for more than one
|
|
temperature supports external temperature sensing.
|
|
|
|
Older motherboards and processors without this feature generally use
|
|
an LM75 placed close to the processor. This is much less accurate.
|
|
|
|
The Pentium 2 'boxed' processor usually has an LM75 very close to the
|
|
base of the box. It can be read through the SMBus to report the
|
|
approximate temperature of the processor. The processor also contains
|
|
an internal temperature sensor (of low accuracy) used as a fail-safe to
|
|
disable the processor in case it gets much too hot (usually around 130
|
|
degrees C). And, the Pentium 2 also has a hard-wired signal (VID
|
|
lines) on it's SEC (single edge connector) which indicates what power
|
|
supply is required to operate the processor.
|
|
|
|
The P6 (Pentium-Pro) may have an LM75 in or just under the socket.
|
|
P6's also have VID lines.
|
|
|
|
Pentiums and Pentium w/ MMX do not have VID lines, and sometimes have
|
|
LM75's under the sockets (depends on the mainboard, and how 'modern' the
|
|
mainboard is).
|
|
|
|
The P2 Xeon was the first Intel processor to include the SMBus
|
|
interface on the P2 Xeon SEC.
|
|
|
|
2.5 How often are the sensor values updated?
|
|
============================================
|
|
|
|
The LM78, and most other sensor chips like it, reads its sensors one by
|
|
one. A complete scanning sweep will take about 1.5 seconds. The LM78
|
|
stops readings sensors if you try to access it, so if you access it
|
|
very often (by reading sensor values; writing new limits is safe) it
|
|
will not find the time to update its sensor values at all! Fortunately,
|
|
the kernel module takes care not to do this, and only reads new values
|
|
each 1.5 seconds. If you read the values again, you will get the 'old'
|
|
values again.
|
|
|
|
2.6 How are alarms triggered?
|
|
=============================
|
|
|
|
It is possible to monitor each sensor and have an alarm go off if it
|
|
crosses some pre-determined limits. There are two sorts of interrupts
|
|
which can be generated by sensor chips if this happens (it depends a
|
|
bit on the actual chip if both are supported; the LM80, for example,
|
|
has only IRQ interrupts): IRQ interrupts and SMI interrupts. IRQ
|
|
stands for Interrupt Request and are the interrupt lines you can find
|
|
in `/proc/interrupts'. SMI stands for System Management Interrupt, and
|
|
is a special interrupt which puts the processor in a secure environment
|
|
independent of any other things running. SMI is currently not
|
|
supported by the Linux kernel. IRQs are supported, of course.
|
|
|
|
Even if no interrupt is generated, some bits in a status register
|
|
will be set until the register is read the next time. If the alarm
|
|
condition persists after that, the bits will be set on the next
|
|
scanning sweep, etc.
|
|
|
|
Most drivers in our package do not support interrupts at this time.
|
|
|
|
3 Installation and Management
|
|
*****************************
|
|
|
|
3.1 Why so many modules, and how do I cope with them?
|
|
=====================================================
|
|
|
|
We tried to make this package as modular as possible. This makes it
|
|
easy to add new drivers, and unused drivers will take no precious kernel
|
|
space. On the other hand, it can be a bit confusing at first.
|
|
|
|
Here are two simple guidelines:
|
|
* Run `sensors-detect' and do what it tells you.
|
|
|
|
* Always use `modprobe', not `insmod'.
|
|
|
|
Further information is in `doc/modules'.
|
|
|
|
3.2 How do I know which chips I own?
|
|
====================================
|
|
|
|
We have an excellent program that scans all your hardware. It is
|
|
called `sensors-detect' and is installed in `/usr/local/sbin' by `make
|
|
install'. Just execute this script, and it will tell you.
|
|
|
|
Chip detection in the drivers is fairly good. That means that it is
|
|
usually harmless to insert more chip drivers than you need. However,
|
|
this can still lead to problems, so we do not recommend it.
|
|
|
|
If sensors-detect didn't find any sensors, either you don't have
|
|
any, or the ones you have, we don't support. (Look at your motherboard
|
|
for candidates, then *note Help::)
|
|
|
|
3.2.1 What chips are on motherboard XYZ?
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*!!!!!!!!! YES THIS IS THE MOST FREQUENT QUESTION WE GET !!!!!!!!!*
|
|
|
|
We have no idea. Here is what you should do:
|
|
1. Run sensors-detect.
|
|
|
|
If that doesn't work:
|
|
2. Look at your motherboard.
|
|
|
|
3. Check the manufacturer's website or ask their support
|
|
|
|
4. Check the Motherboard Monitor (http://mbm.livewiredev.com/)
|
|
website and the "links"
|
|
(http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/cvs/lm_sensors2/doc/useful_addresses.html)
|
|
page on our website (http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/) some good
|
|
cross-references.
|
|
|
|
3.2.2 Do you support motherboard XYZ?
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
We don't support boards, we support chips. *Note What chips are on
|
|
motherboard XYZ: Section 3.2.1.
|
|
|
|
3.2.3 Do you support chip XYZ?
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
This we have good answers for.
|
|
* Sorted by Manufacturer: `README'
|
|
|
|
* Sorted by Manufacturer:
|
|
`http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/supported.html'
|
|
|
|
* Sorted by Sensor Driver: `doc/chips/SUMMARY'
|
|
|
|
* Newest Driver Status:
|
|
`http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/newdrivers.html'
|
|
|
|
3.2.4 Anybody working on a driver for chip XYZ?
|
|
-----------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Newest Driver Status: `http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/newdrivers.html'
|
|
|
|
3.3 Which modules should I insert?
|
|
==================================
|
|
|
|
`sensors-detect' will tell you. Take the `modprobe' lines it recommends
|
|
and paste them into the appropriate `/etc/rc.d/xxxx' file to be
|
|
executed at startup.
|
|
|
|
You need one module for each sensor chip and bus adapter you own; if
|
|
there are sensor chips on the ISA bus, you also need `i2c-isa.o'. for
|
|
each type of chip you own. That's all. On my computer, I could use the
|
|
following lines:
|
|
* `modprobe i2c-isa'
|
|
|
|
* `modprobe i2c-piix4'
|
|
|
|
* `modprobe lm78'
|
|
|
|
* `modprobe lm75'
|
|
|
|
* `modprobe i2c-dev'
|
|
|
|
* `sensors -s'
|
|
|
|
3.4 Do I need the configuration file `/etc/sensors.conf'?
|
|
=========================================================
|
|
|
|
Yes, for any applications that use `libsensors,' including the
|
|
`sensors' application included in our package. It tells libsensors how
|
|
to translate the values the chip measures to real-world values. This is
|
|
especially important for voltage inputs. The default configuration file
|
|
should usually do the trick. It is automatically installed as
|
|
`/etc/sensors.conf', but it will not overwrite any existing file with
|
|
that name.
|
|
|
|
3.4.1 The labels for the voltage and temperature readings in `sensors' are incorrect!
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Every motherboard is different. You can customize the labels in the
|
|
file `/etc/sensors.conf'. That's why it exists! The default labelling
|
|
(in `lib/chips.c' and `/etc/sensors.conf') is just a template.
|
|
|
|
3.4.2 The min and max for the readings in `sensors' are incorrect!
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
You can customize them in the file `/etc/sensors.conf'. See above.
|
|
|
|
3.4.3 The min and max settings in `/etc/sensors.conf' didn't take effect!
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
You forgot to run `sensors -s'. See above.
|
|
|
|
3.4.4 One sensor isn't hooked up on my board!
|
|
---------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Use an `ignore' line in `/etc/sensors.conf' so it isn't displayed in
|
|
`sensors'.
|
|
|
|
3.4.5 I need help with `sensors.conf'!
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
There is detailed help at the top of that file.
|
|
|
|
3.4.6 Do you have a database of `sensors.conf' entries for specific boards?
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
No. Good idea though. If you would like to set one up on your website
|
|
send us mail and we will set up a link to it.
|
|
|
|
3.5 What about the `No such file or directory' warnings when I compile?
|
|
=======================================================================
|
|
|
|
Don't worry about them. The dependency files (which tell which files
|
|
should be recompiled when certain files change) are created
|
|
dynamically. They are not distributed with the package. The `make'
|
|
program notices they are not there, and warns about that - and the
|
|
first thing it will do is generate them. So all is well.
|
|
|
|
3.6 I get all kinds of weird compilation errors?
|
|
================================================
|
|
|
|
Check that the correct i2c header files are used. Depending on how you
|
|
installed, they should be under either `/usr/local/include' or
|
|
`/usr/src/linux*/include'. Try to edit the `Makefile' for the other
|
|
setting.
|
|
|
|
3.6.1 `No rule to make target xxxx needed by xxxx' - how to fix?
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
* *Note I get all kinds of weird compilation errors: Section 3.6,
|
|
also try `make clean' in `lm_sensors'.
|
|
|
|
* If that doesn't work, try `make clean' in `i2c'.
|
|
|
|
* If that doesn't work, try `make clean' in the kernel.
|
|
|
|
* Also make sure `/usr/include/linux' points to
|
|
`/usr/src/linux/include/linux'.
|
|
|
|
3.7 It still does not compile or patch!
|
|
=======================================
|
|
|
|
Have you installed the matching version of the i2c package? Remember,
|
|
compilation is not enough, you also need to install it for the header
|
|
files to be found!
|
|
|
|
If you want to patch the kernel, you will have to apply the i2c
|
|
patches first!
|
|
|
|
3.8 `make install' fails on Mandrake kernels
|
|
============================================
|
|
|
|
Mandrake uses a non-standard `version.h' file which confuses our
|
|
`Makefile'. Edit our `Makefile' on the `MODDIR :=' line to hard-code
|
|
the module directory.
|
|
|
|
3.9 I get unresolved symbols when I `modprobe' modules (Red Hat especially)
|
|
===========================================================================
|
|
|
|
Example:
|
|
*** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.5/kernel/drivers/i2c/i2c-i810.o
|
|
i2c_bit_add_bus_R8c3bc60e
|
|
i2c_bit_del_bus_R92b18f49
|
|
|
|
You can also run `depmod -a -e' to see all unresolved symbols.
|
|
|
|
These are module versioning problems. Generally you did not compile
|
|
against the kernel you are running. Sometimes the Red Hat source you
|
|
have is not for the kernel you are running. You must compile our
|
|
package against the source for the kernel you are running with
|
|
something like `make LINUX=/usr/src/linux-2.4.14'.
|
|
|
|
Try the following to be sure:
|
|
|
|
* `nm --extern MODULE.o' Filter out the kernel symbols, like
|
|
`kmalloc', `printk' etc. and note the number code behind them,
|
|
like `printk_R1b7d4074'. If there is no numeric code after them,
|
|
note this too.
|
|
|
|
* `grep SYMBOL /proc/ksyms' Substitute SYMBOL by the basename of the
|
|
symbols above, like `kmalloc', `printk' etc. Note the number code
|
|
behind them, or the lack thereof.
|
|
|
|
* Compare both sets of symbols. Are they the same? If so, the problem
|
|
lies somewhere else. Are they different? If so, you have a module
|
|
versioning problem.
|
|
|
|
3.10 I2C_DRIVERID_ADM1024 undefined (Red Hat especially)
|
|
========================================================
|
|
|
|
In some versions of Redhat, an RPM is included to provide i2c support.
|
|
However, this RPM does not place the header files in the kernel
|
|
directory structure. When you update kernels, they may persist. To
|
|
get rid of these obsolete header files, at a command prompt:
|
|
|
|
1. `rpm -qa | grep i2c'
|
|
|
|
2. Look for `kernel-i2c,' or a similar rpm in the output
|
|
|
|
3. <as root> `rpm -ev kernel-i2c' (or the name of the similar package)
|
|
If this complains about dependencies, you can try adding
|
|
`--nodeps', but this *MAY* break something else. Not likely, as
|
|
you have upgraded kernels, and nothing should be using the old i2c
|
|
stuff anymore anyway. Just don't use it with abandon.
|
|
|
|
4. Try (in the build directory of `lm_sensors)'
|
|
`make clean'
|
|
`make'
|
|
|
|
5. _If_ you still have problems, you may have to replace the include
|
|
paths in the `.c/.h' files with absolute paths to the header files.
|
|
More of a workaround than a real fix, but at least you can get it
|
|
to work.
|
|
|
|
4 Problems
|
|
**********
|
|
|
|
4.1 My fans report exactly half/double their values compared to the BIOS?
|
|
=========================================================================
|
|
|
|
The problem with much of the sensor data is that it is impossible to
|
|
properly interpret some of the readings without knowing what the
|
|
hardware configuration is. Some fans report one 'tick' each rotation,
|
|
some report two 'ticks' each rotation. It is easy to resolve this
|
|
through the configuration file `/etc/sensors.conf':
|
|
|
|
chip lm78-* # Or whatever chip this relates to
|
|
compute fan1 2*@,@/2 # This will double the fan1 reading
|
|
# -- or --
|
|
compute fan1 @/2,2*@ # This will halve the fan1 reading
|
|
|
|
See `doc/fan-divisors' in our package for further information.
|
|
|
|
4.1.1 Fans sometimes/always read 0!!
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
You may not have a three-wire fan, which is required.
|
|
|
|
You may need to increase the 'fan divisor'. See `doc/fan-divisors'
|
|
in our package for further information.
|
|
|
|
4.1.2 I doubled the fan divisor and the fan still reads 7000!
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Believe it or not, doubling the 'fan divisor' will not halve the fan
|
|
reading. You have to add a compute line in `/etc/sensors.conf'. *Note
|
|
My fans report exactly half/double their values compared to the BIOS:
|
|
Section 4.1, and see `doc/fan-divisors' in our package for further
|
|
information.
|
|
|
|
4.2 Why do my two LM75's report "-48 degrees"?
|
|
==============================================
|
|
|
|
For starters, those aren't LM75's. Your mainboard actually has the
|
|
Winbond W83781D which emulates two LM75's, but many systems which use
|
|
the Winbond chip (such as the Asus P2B) don't have the thermo-resisters
|
|
connected to the chip resulting in these strange -48 degree readings.
|
|
|
|
In upcoming versions, you will be able to disable non-interesting
|
|
readings.
|
|
|
|
4.3 Why do I have two Vcore readings, I have only one processor!
|
|
================================================================
|
|
|
|
The LM78 has seven voltage sensors. The default way of connecting them
|
|
is used in the configuration file. This includes a VCore2, even if you
|
|
do not have one. You can easily edit the configuration file to give it
|
|
another name, or make this reading disappear using an `ignore' line.
|
|
|
|
Note that Vcore2 is often the same as Vcore on motherboards which
|
|
only support one processor. Another possibility is that Vcore2 is not
|
|
connected at all and will not have a valid reading at all. A third
|
|
possibility, is that Vcore2 monitors something else, so you should not
|
|
be too surprised if the values are completely different.
|
|
|
|
4.4 How do those ALARMS work? The current value is within range but there is still an ALARM warning!
|
|
====================================================================================================
|
|
|
|
The ALARM indications in `sensors' are those reported by the sensor
|
|
chip itself. They are NOT calculated by `sensors'. `sensors' simply
|
|
reads the ALARM bits and reports them.
|
|
|
|
An ALARM will go off when a minimum or maximum limit is crossed.
|
|
The ALARM is then latched - that is, it will stay there until the
|
|
chip's registers are next accessed - which will be the next time you
|
|
read these values, but not within (usually) 1.5 seconds since the last
|
|
update.
|
|
|
|
Reading the registers clears the ALARMS, unless the current value is
|
|
still out of range.
|
|
|
|
The purpose of this scheme is to tell you if there has been a
|
|
problem and report it to the user. Voltage or temperature spikes get
|
|
detected without having to read the sensor chip hundreds of times a
|
|
second. The implemetation details depend a bit on the kind of chip.
|
|
See the specific chip documentation in `doc/chips' and the chip
|
|
datasheet for more information.
|
|
|
|
4.5 My voltage readings seem to drift a bit. Is something wrong?
|
|
================================================================
|
|
|
|
No, probably not. If your motherboard heats up a bit, the sensed
|
|
voltages will drift a bit. If your power supply is loaded (because a
|
|
disk gets going, for example), the voltages may get a bit lower. Heavy
|
|
processor activity, in particular, dramatically increases core voltage
|
|
supply load which will often cause variation in the other supplies. As
|
|
long as they stay within a sensible range (say 5% of the nominal value
|
|
for CPU core voltages, and 10% for other voltages), there is no reason
|
|
to worry.
|
|
|
|
4.6 Some measurements are way out of range. What happened?
|
|
==========================================================
|
|
|
|
Each module tries to set limits to sensible values on initialization,
|
|
but a module does not know how a chip is actually connected. This is
|
|
described in the configuration file, which is not read by kernel
|
|
modules. So limits can be strange, if the chip is connected in a
|
|
non-standard way.
|
|
|
|
Readings can also be strange; there are several reasons for this.
|
|
Temperature sensors, for example, can simply not be present, even though
|
|
the chip supports them. Also, it can be that the input is used in a
|
|
non-standard way. You can use the configuration file to describe how
|
|
this measurement should be interpreted; see the comments the example
|
|
file for more information.
|
|
|
|
4.6.1 -5V and -12V readings are way out of range!
|
|
-------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
It's very frequent that negative voltage lines are not wired because
|
|
motherboard manufacturers don't think they're worth monitoring (they
|
|
are mostly unused these days). You can just add `ignore inN' lines to
|
|
`/etc/sensors.conf' to hide them.
|
|
|
|
4.7 What are VID lines? Why is the VID reading wrong?
|
|
=====================================================
|
|
|
|
These describe the core voltage for your processor. They are supported
|
|
for most processors, however they are not always correctly connected to
|
|
the sensor chip, so the readings may be invalid. A reading of 0V,
|
|
+3.5V or +2.05V is especially suspect. If this is the case, add a line
|
|
`ignore vid' to `/etc/sensors.conf', and change the min and max
|
|
settings for the Processor Core voltage (often in0_min and in0_max) in
|
|
that file so that they don't depend on vid.
|
|
|
|
The CPU nominal voltage is computed from VID lines according to a
|
|
formula that depends on the CPU type. Most chips that report a VID
|
|
value can be configured to use either VRM 8.2 (for Pentium III) or VRM
|
|
9.0 (for Pentium 4 and Athlon). You chose which one you want through
|
|
`/etc/sensors.conf'. See `doc/vid' for more information.
|
|
|
|
4.8 I read sensor values several times a second, but they are only updated only each second or so. Why?
|
|
=======================================================================================================
|
|
|
|
If we would read the registers more often, it would not find the time
|
|
to update them. So we only update our readings once each 1.5 seconds
|
|
(the actual delay is chip-specific; for some chips, it may not be needed
|
|
at all).
|
|
|
|
4.9 It sometimes seems to take almost a second before I see the sensor reading results. Why?
|
|
============================================================================================
|
|
|
|
ISA bus access is fast, but SMBus access is really slow. If you have a
|
|
lot of sensors, it just takes a lot of time to access them. Fortunately,
|
|
this has almost no impact on the system as a whole, as another job can
|
|
run while we are waiting for the transaction to finish.
|
|
|
|
4.10 Can I be alerted when an ALARM occurs?
|
|
===========================================
|
|
|
|
No, you can't; and it may well be never supported.
|
|
|
|
Almost no mainboard we have encountered have actually connected the
|
|
IRQ-out pin of sensor chips. That means that we could enable IRQ
|
|
reporting, but nothing would happen. Also, even if a motherboard has it
|
|
connected, it is unclear what interrupt number would be triggered. And
|
|
IRQ lines are a scarce facility, which means that almost nobody would
|
|
be able to use it anyway.
|
|
|
|
The SMI interrupt is only available on a few types of chips. It is
|
|
really a very obscure way to handle interrupts, and supporting it under
|
|
Linux might be quite hard to do.
|
|
|
|
Your best bet would be to poll the alarm file with a user-land daemon
|
|
which alerts you if an alarm is raised. I am not aware of any program
|
|
which does the job, though you might want to examine one of the
|
|
graphical monitor programs under X, see
|
|
`http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/useful_addresses.html' for addresses.
|
|
|
|
4.11 SMBus transactions on my PIIX4 simply don't work (timeouts happen). Why?
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
|
|
Some chips which mainboard makers connect to the SMBus are not SMBus
|
|
devices. An example is the 91xx clock generator chips. When read,
|
|
these devices can lock up the SMBus until the next hard reboot. This
|
|
is because they have a similar serial interface (like the I2C), but
|
|
don't conform to Intel's SMBus standard.
|
|
|
|
Why did they connect these devices to the SMBus if they aren't
|
|
compatible? Good question! :') Actually, these devices may support
|
|
being written to, but lock things up when they are read.
|
|
|
|
4.12 My BIOS reports a much higher CPU temperature than your modules!
|
|
=====================================================================
|
|
|
|
We display the actual temperature of the sensor. This may not be the
|
|
temperature you are interested in, though. If a sensor should measure
|
|
the CPU temperature, it must be in thermal contact with it. In
|
|
practice, it is just somewhere near it. Your BIOS may correct for this
|
|
(by adding, for example, thirty degrees to the measured temperature).
|
|
The correction factor is regrettably different for each mainboard, so
|
|
we can not do this in the module itself. You can do it through the
|
|
configuration file, though:
|
|
|
|
chip lm75-*-49 # Or whatever chip this relates to
|
|
label temp "Processor"
|
|
compute temp @*1.2+13,(@-13)/1.2 # Or whatever formula
|
|
|
|
4.13 I try to read the raw `/proc' files, but the values are strange?!?
|
|
=======================================================================
|
|
|
|
Remember, these values do not take the configuration file `compute'
|
|
lines in account. This is especially obvious for voltage readings
|
|
(usually called in? or vin?). Use a program linked to libsensors (like
|
|
the provided `sensors' program) instead.
|
|
|
|
4.14 How do I set new limits?
|
|
=============================
|
|
|
|
Change the limit values in `/etc/sensors.conf' and then run `sensors
|
|
-s'.
|
|
|
|
4.14.1 I set new limits and it didn't work?
|
|
-------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
You forgot to run `sensors -s'. Put it in a `/etc/rc.d/...' file after
|
|
the modprobe lines to run at startup.
|
|
|
|
4.15 Some sensors are doubly detected?
|
|
======================================
|
|
|
|
Yes, this is still a problem. It is partially solved by alias detection
|
|
and confidence values in sensors-detect, but it is really tough.
|
|
|
|
Double detections can be caused by two things: sensors can be
|
|
detected to both the ISA and the SMBus (and if you have loaded the
|
|
approprate adapter drivers, it will be detected on both), and some
|
|
chips simulate other chips (the Winbond W83781D simulates LM75 chips on
|
|
the SMBus, for example). Remove the offending adapter or chip driver, or
|
|
run sensors-detect and add the `ignore=' modprobe parameters it
|
|
suggests.
|
|
|
|
4.16 I ran sensors-detect, but now I get very strange readings?!?
|
|
=================================================================
|
|
|
|
Your SMBus (PIIX4?) is probably crashed or hung. There are some
|
|
mainboards which connect a clock chip to the SMBus. Unfortunately, this
|
|
clock chip hangs the PIIX4 if it is read (it is an I2C device, but not
|
|
SMBus compatible). We have found no way of solving this, except for
|
|
rebooting your computer. Next time when you run sensors-detect, you
|
|
may want to exclude addresses 0x69 and/or 0x6a, by entering `s' when
|
|
you are asked whether you want to scan the PIIX4.
|
|
|
|
4.17 Bad readings from particular chips
|
|
=======================================
|
|
|
|
See below for some particularly troublesome chips. Also be sure and
|
|
check `doc/chips/xxxxx' for the particular driver.
|
|
|
|
4.17.1 Bad readings from the AS99127F!
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The Asus AS99127F is a modified version of the Winbond W83781D. Asus
|
|
will not release a datasheet. The driver was developed by tedious
|
|
experimentation. We've done the best we can. If you want to make
|
|
adjustments to the readings please edit `/etc/sensors.conf.' Please
|
|
don't ask us to fix the driver. Ask Asus to release a datasheet.
|
|
|
|
4.17.2 Bad readings from the VIA 686A!
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The Via 686A datasheet is incomplete. Via will not release details.
|
|
The driver was developed by tedious experimentation. We've done the
|
|
best we can. If you want to make adjustments to the readings please
|
|
edit `/etc/sensors.conf.' Please don't ask us to fix the driver. Ask
|
|
Via to release a better datasheet. Also, don't forget to `modprobe
|
|
i2c-isa'.
|
|
|
|
4.17.3 Bad readings from the MTP008!
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The MTP008 has programmable temperature sensor types. If your sensor
|
|
type does not match the default, you will have to change it. See
|
|
`doc/chips/mtp008' for details. Also, MTP008 chips seem to randomly
|
|
refuse to respond, for unknown reasons. You can see this as 'XX'
|
|
entries in i2cdump.
|
|
|
|
4.17.4 Bad temperature readings from the SIS5595!
|
|
-------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
This chip can use multiple thermistor types and there are also two
|
|
different versions of the chip. We are trying to get the driver working
|
|
better and develop formulas for different thermistors but we aren't
|
|
there yet. Sorry. Also, many times the chip isn't really a sis5595 but
|
|
it was misidentified. We are working on improving that too.
|
|
|
|
4.17.5 Bad readings from a w8378[12]d!
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Do you own an ASUS motherboard? Perhaps your chip is being
|
|
misidentified. Look on the motherboard (or at
|
|
`http://mbm.livewiredev.com') for a 'Winbond' or Asus chip. Often the
|
|
real device is an Asus as99127f. If so, the driver can be forced to
|
|
recognize the as99127f with `force_as99127f=BUS,0x2d' where `BUS' is
|
|
your i2c bus number. Cat /proc/bus/i2c to see a list of bus numbers.
|
|
Read the w83781d module documentation (`doc/chips/w83781d') for more
|
|
details.
|
|
|
|
4.17.6 Bus hangs on Ali 1543 on Asus P5A boards!
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The SMBus tends to hang on this board and it seems to get worse at
|
|
higher temperatures. Use ISA accesses to reliably use the w83781d
|
|
monitor chip on this board and use the `ignore=1,0x2d' or similar option
|
|
to the w83781d module to prevent i2c accesses.
|
|
|
|
4.17.7 Bad readings from LM75!
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The LM75 detection is poor and other hardware is often misdetected as
|
|
an LM75. Figure out what you really have *Note What chips are on
|
|
motherboard XYZ: Section 3.2.1.
|
|
|
|
4.17.8 Bad readings from LM78!
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The LM78 is no longer manufactured by National Semiconductor. You
|
|
probably don't have a real LM78 but something similar that we do not
|
|
recogize or support. Figure out what you really have *Note What chips
|
|
are on motherboard XYZ: Section 3.2.1.
|
|
|
|
4.17.9 Bad readings from LM80!
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The LM80 detection is poor and other hardware is often misdetected as
|
|
an LM80. Figure out what you really have *Note What chips are on
|
|
motherboard XYZ: Section 3.2.1.
|
|
|
|
4.17.10 Bad readings from it87!
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The it87 temperature sesnsors are configured, unfortunately, in a way
|
|
different from w83781d. They cannot be configured from
|
|
`/etc/sensors.conf'; they must be set at modprobe insertion with
|
|
`modprobe it87 temp_type=0xXX'. See `doc/chips/it87' for details.
|
|
|
|
4.18 How do I configure two chips (LM87) differently?
|
|
=====================================================
|
|
|
|
There is a SuperMicro board with two LM87's on it that are not hooked
|
|
up in the same way, so they need different defaults. For example, both
|
|
CPU temperatures go to one LM87.
|
|
|
|
Make two different sections in `/etc/sensors.conf' as follows:
|
|
chip "lm87-i2c-*-2c"
|
|
put configuration for the chip at 0x2c here
|
|
chip "lm87-i2c-*-2d"
|
|
put configuration for the chip at 0x2d here
|
|
|
|
There is a commented example in `sensors.conf.eg' which should be
|
|
helpful.
|
|
|
|
4.19 Dmesg says `Upgrade BIOS'! I don't want to!
|
|
================================================
|
|
|
|
If the problem is a PCI device is not present in `lspci', the solution
|
|
is complex. For the ALI M7101 device, there is a solution which uses the
|
|
2.4 kernel's `hotplug' facility. See `prog/hotplug' in our package.
|
|
For other PCI devices, you can try to modify the m7101 solution in
|
|
`prog/hotplug'.
|
|
|
|
If dmesg says `try force_addr', see below. Other drivers generally
|
|
do not support the force_addr parameter. Sorry. Check the documentation
|
|
for your driver in `doc/[chips,busses]' and if we don't support it you
|
|
can send us your request.
|
|
|
|
4.19.1 Dmesg says `use force_addr=0xaddr'! What address do I use?
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If the problem is a PCI device whose base address is not set, you may
|
|
be able to set the address with a force parameter. The via686a and
|
|
sis5595 chip drivers, and some bus drivers, support the command line
|
|
`modprobe via686a force_addr=0xADDRESS' where ADDRESS is the I/O
|
|
address. You must select an address that is not in use. `cat
|
|
`/proc/ioports'' to check (carefully) for conflicts. A high number like
|
|
0xf000 is generally safe.
|
|
|
|
4.20 Sensors says `Can't access procfs/sysfs file'
|
|
==================================================
|
|
|
|
* (Linux 2.6) Did you `modprobe i2c_sensor'? Check `lsmod'.
|
|
|
|
* (Linux 2.4) Did you `modprobe i2c-proc'? Check `lsmod'.
|
|
|
|
* If you did `sensors -s', did you run it as root?
|
|
|
|
* (Linux 2.6) Do you have sysfs support in your kernel (is `/sys'
|
|
there and populated)?
|
|
|
|
* (Linux 2.4) Do you have procfs support in your kernel (is `/proc'
|
|
there and populated)?
|
|
|
|
4.21 Sensors says `No sensors found!'
|
|
=====================================
|
|
|
|
* Did `sensors-detect' find sensors? (If not *note Sensors-detect
|
|
doesnt find any sensors::)
|
|
|
|
* Did you do what `sensors-detect' said?
|
|
|
|
* Did you `modprobe' your sensor modules?
|
|
|
|
* Did you `modprobe' your I2C adapter modules?
|
|
|
|
* Did you `modprobe i2c-isa' if you have ISA sensor chips?
|
|
|
|
* Check `lsmod'.
|
|
|
|
4.22 Sensors output is not correct!
|
|
===================================
|
|
|
|
What specifically is the trouble?
|
|
* Labels: *Note The labels for the voltage and temperature readings
|
|
in sensors are incorrect: Section 3.4.1.
|
|
|
|
* Min/max readings: *Note The min and max for the readings in
|
|
sensors are incorrect: Section 3.4.2, and *Note The min and max
|
|
settings didnt take effect: Section 3.4.3.
|
|
|
|
* AS99127F: *Note I ran sensors-detect but now I get very strange
|
|
readings?: Section 4.16.
|
|
|
|
* Via 686A: *Note I ran sensors-detect but now I get very strange
|
|
readings?: Section 4.16.
|
|
|
|
* Other specific chips: *Note I ran sensors-detect but now I get
|
|
very strange readings?: Section 4.16.
|
|
|
|
* No output for a particular sensors chip: *Note What to do if it
|
|
inserts but nothing happens: Section 5.3.
|
|
|
|
* No output at all: *Note Sensors says No sensors found: Section
|
|
4.21, *Note What to do if it inserts but nothing happens: Section
|
|
5.3.
|
|
|
|
* Completely bad output for a particular sensor chip: *Note What to
|
|
do if I read only bogus information: Section 5.4.
|
|
|
|
* One particular sensor readings:
|
|
* Maybe it isn't hooked up? - tell 'sensors' to ignore it.
|
|
*Note One sensor isnt hooked up on my board: Section 3.4.4.
|
|
|
|
* Maybe it is hooked up differently on your motherboard? -
|
|
adjust `sensors.conf' calculation.
|
|
|
|
4.23 What is at I2C address XXX?
|
|
================================
|
|
|
|
In general, we don't know. Start by running `sensors-detect'. If it
|
|
doesn't recognize it, try running `i2cdump'. A partial list of
|
|
manufacturers' IDs are at the bottom of `doc/chips/SUMMARY'.
|
|
|
|
4.23.1 What is at I2C address 0x69?
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
A clock chip. Often, accessing these clock chips in the wrong way will
|
|
instantly crash your computer. Sensors-detect carefully avoids these
|
|
chips. If you really really want to play with your clock chip you can
|
|
look at `kernel/chips/icspll.c' in our package. But we do not recommend
|
|
it. You have been warned.
|
|
|
|
4.23.2 What is at I2C addresses 0x50 - 0x57?
|
|
--------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
EEPROMs on your SDRAM DIMMs. Load the eeprom module to look at some
|
|
basic data in `sensors' or use the program
|
|
`prog/eeprom/decode-dimms.pl' to get more information than you ever
|
|
wanted.
|
|
|
|
4.23.3 What is at I2C addresses 0x30 - 0x37?
|
|
--------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
These are often 'shadows' of your EEPROMs on your SDRAM DIMMs at
|
|
addresses 0x50 - 0x57. They are the 'software write-protect' registers
|
|
of the SDRAM Serial Presence Detect EEPROMs. If you try and do a
|
|
`i2cdump' on them to read the location, you won't get anything, because
|
|
they contain a single write-only register. This register can be used
|
|
to permanently write-protect the contents of the eeprom.
|
|
|
|
4.24 Sensors-detect doesn't work at all
|
|
=======================================
|
|
|
|
It could be many things. What was the problem? *Note Problems on
|
|
particular motherboards: Section 4.31.
|
|
|
|
4.24.1 Sensors-detect says "Couldn't open /proc/bus/i2c?!?"
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
You don't have i2c support in your kernel, or the i2c-core module was
|
|
not loaded and you did not run sensors-detect as root.
|
|
|
|
4.24.2 Sensors-detect says "Can't open /dev/i2c[-/]0"
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Your `/dev/i2c-0,' `/dev/i2c0', or `/dev/i2c/0' files do not exist or
|
|
you did not run `sensors-detect' as root. Run the script
|
|
`prog/mkdev/mkdev.sh' to create the `/dev/i2c-x' files. Run `devfs' in
|
|
the kernel to get the `/dev/i2c/x' files.
|
|
|
|
4.24.3 Sensors-detect doesn't find any sensors!
|
|
-----------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Either
|
|
1. The board doesn't have any sensors.
|
|
|
|
2. We don't support the sensors on the board.
|
|
|
|
3. The sensors it has are on an I2C bus connected to an I2C bus
|
|
adapter that we don't support.
|
|
|
|
4. You don't have the latest version of lm_sensors.
|
|
|
|
But in any case you should figure out what is on the board:
|
|
1. Look at your motherboard.
|
|
|
|
2. Check the manufacturer's website.
|
|
|
|
3. Check the Motherboard Monitor (http://mbm.livewiredev.com/)
|
|
website.
|
|
|
|
When you know what chips you have, check the Newest Driver Status
|
|
(http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/newdrivers.html) web page to see if
|
|
support has been added for your chip in a later release or in CVS.
|
|
|
|
4.25 Sensors says `Error: Line xxx: zzzzzzz'
|
|
============================================
|
|
|
|
These are errors from the libsensors library in reading the
|
|
`/etc/sensors.conf' configuration file. Go to that line number and fix
|
|
it. If you have a parse error, perhaps you have to put the feature name
|
|
in double quotes.
|
|
|
|
4.26 Sensors only gives the name, adapter, and algorithm for my chip
|
|
====================================================================
|
|
|
|
If `sensors' only says this, for example, and doesn't provide any
|
|
actual data at all:
|
|
|
|
it87-isa-0290
|
|
Adapter: ISA adapter
|
|
Algorithm: ISA algorithm
|
|
|
|
Your chip is not currently supported by `sensors' and so all it does
|
|
is print out that information. Get the latest release and be sure you
|
|
are running the `sensors' program it installed and not some older
|
|
`sensors'.
|
|
|
|
4.27 Sensors says `ERROR: Can't get xxxxx data!'
|
|
================================================
|
|
|
|
* (Linux 2.6) Make sure you are using one of the recommended
|
|
kernel/lm_sensors combination
|
|
(http://secure.netroedge.com/~lm78/kernel26.html).
|
|
|
|
* You have a `libsensors'/`sensors' mismatch. `sensors' is unable to
|
|
get a data entry from `libsensors'. You probably have an old
|
|
`libsensors' in your `/etc/ld.so.conf' path. Make sure you did
|
|
(as root) a `make install' (Linux 2.4) or `make user_install'
|
|
(Linux 2.6) followed by a `ldconfig'. Then check the output of
|
|
`ldconfig -v | grep libsensors' to verify that there is only ONE
|
|
`libsensors' entry and that it matches the `libsensors' that was
|
|
built in the `lib/' directory in `lm_sensors2'.
|
|
|
|
4.28 Sensors doesn't find any sensors, just eeproms.
|
|
====================================================
|
|
|
|
*Note Sensors-detect doesnt work at all: Section 4.24, if
|
|
`sensors-detect' failed to find any sensors.
|
|
|
|
If `sensors-detect' did find sensors, did you insert your modules?
|
|
For chips on the ISA bus, did you insert i2c-isa?
|
|
|
|
*Note What to do if a module wont insert: Section 5.2, if the
|
|
modules didn't insert, also *Note Sensors says No sensors found:
|
|
Section 4.21.
|
|
|
|
4.29 Inserting modules hangs my board
|
|
=====================================
|
|
|
|
There are several possible causes:
|
|
1. Bus driver problems. Insert the bus driver first, before you have
|
|
inserted any chip drivers, to verify.
|
|
|
|
2. Wrong chip driver. Verify that you have a chip supported by the
|
|
chip driver, see *Note What chips are on motherboard XYZ: Section
|
|
3.2.1.
|
|
|
|
3. The chip driver is reinitializing the chip, which undoes critical
|
|
initialization done by the BIOS. Try the parameter `init=0' for
|
|
the w83781d driver; this is the only driver supporting this
|
|
parameter.
|
|
|
|
4. Some chips on the bus don't like to be probed at all. After
|
|
inserting the bus driver (but not the chip drivers), run
|
|
`i2cdetect' on the bus, then `i2cdump' on each address responding
|
|
to `i2cdetect'. This may find the culprit. Do not `i2cdump
|
|
address 0x69', the clock chip.
|
|
|
|
5. The chip driver is incorrectly finding a second chip on the bus
|
|
and is accessing it. For example, with the Tyan 2688 with a
|
|
w83781d at 0x29, use `modprobe
|
|
ignore_range=0,0x00,0x28,0,0x2a,0x7f' to prevent access to other
|
|
addresses. (`init=0' also req'd for the Tyan 2688).
|
|
|
|
4.30 Inserting modules slows down my board
|
|
==========================================
|
|
|
|
Generally this is caused by an overtemperature alarm output from the
|
|
sensor chip. This triggers hardware on the board which automatically
|
|
slows down the CPU clock. Be sure that your temperature limits are
|
|
above the temperature reading. Put the new limits in
|
|
`/etc/sensors.conf' and run `sensors -s'.
|
|
|
|
4.31 Problems on particular motherboards
|
|
========================================
|
|
|
|
The following boards have unique problems and solutions.
|
|
|
|
4.31.1 Asus P4B
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
See `prog/hotplug/README.p4b' if your SMBus master is not found.
|
|
|
|
4.31.2 Tyan 2460, 2462
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
See support tickets 805, 765, 781, 812, 813, and 867 for information.
|
|
|
|
4.31.3 Tyan 2466
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
See support tickets 941, 840, and 841 for information.
|
|
|
|
4.31.4 Tyan 2688
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
For board hangs, see support ticket 721 for information. Also *Note
|
|
Inserting modules hangs my board: Section 4.29.
|
|
|
|
4.32 Problems on particular systems
|
|
===================================
|
|
|
|
For IBM systems, see `README.thinkpad'.
|
|
|
|
4.33 Problems on 2.6 kernels
|
|
============================
|
|
|
|
Not all drivers have been ported to 2.6. If your favorite driver is not
|
|
in 2.6, the reason is that nobody has ported it. Please don't bother
|
|
asking us why it is not in 2.6. If you would like to port the driver,
|
|
see the file Documentation/i2c/porting-clients in the 2.6 kernel tree
|
|
for help, then send us the ported driver when you are done.
|
|
|
|
5 How to Ask for Help
|
|
*********************
|
|
|
|
5.1 What to send us when asking for help
|
|
========================================
|
|
|
|
We are always willing to answer questions if things don't work out.
|
|
Please email <sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com>, and not the individual
|
|
authors, unless you have something private to say.
|
|
|
|
Instead of using email, you can also use the web-based support area,
|
|
at `http://secure.netroedge.com/~lm78/support.html'. You will be helped
|
|
just as fast, and others may profit from the answer too. You will be
|
|
emailed automatically when your question has been answered.
|
|
|
|
Here's what you should send us:
|
|
|
|
* The dmesg or syslog output if applicable
|
|
|
|
* The output of (as root) `prog/detect/sensors-detect'
|
|
|
|
* The output of `lsmod'
|
|
|
|
* If a PCI chip problem:
|
|
* The output of `lspci -n'
|
|
|
|
* If an I2C sensor chip problem:
|
|
* The output of (as root) `prog/detect/i2cdetect X' where X =
|
|
the bus number (run `i2cdetect' with no arguments to list the
|
|
busses) (please send this only if it's not all `XX')
|
|
|
|
* The output of (as root) `prog/dump/i2cdump X 0xXX' where XX =
|
|
the address of each chip you see in the output of
|
|
`i2cdetect'. (run once for each chip) (please send this only
|
|
if it's not all `ff')
|
|
|
|
* If an ISA sensor chip problem:
|
|
* The output of (as root) `prog/dump/isadump 0x295 0x296' (only
|
|
if it's not all `XX')
|
|
|
|
* Part numbers of chips on your motherboard you think are the sensor
|
|
chips (look at your motherboard)
|
|
|
|
* Motherboard type
|
|
|
|
* Sensors version
|
|
|
|
* Kernel version
|
|
|
|
5.2 What to do if a module won't insert?
|
|
========================================
|
|
|
|
Did you use `modprobe' instead of `insmod'??? Don't use insmod.
|
|
|
|
Were there unresolved symbols? Did you run `depmod -a'? Run `depmod
|
|
-a -e' to see where the symbol problem is.
|
|
|
|
ALWAYS inspect the output of `dmesg'. That's where the error
|
|
messages come out!!! Don't rely on the generic message from `modprobe'.
|
|
If you still can't figure it out, send us the information listed above.
|
|
|
|
5.3 What to do if it inserts, but nothing happens?
|
|
==================================================
|
|
|
|
For an ISA sensor chip, did you also `modprobe i2c-isa'? It must be
|
|
inserted.
|
|
|
|
For an I2C sensor chip, did you also `modprobe i2c-xxx' where xxx is
|
|
your I2C bus adapter? It must be inserted.
|
|
|
|
Always inspect the output of `dmesg'. That's where the error
|
|
messages come out. If you still can't figure it out, send us the
|
|
information listed above.
|
|
|
|
5.4 What to do if I read only bogus information?
|
|
================================================
|
|
|
|
It may be that this was a mis-detection: the chip may not be present.
|
|
If you are convinced there is something wrong, verify that you indeed
|
|
have the devices on your motherboard that you think you do. Look at
|
|
the motherboard and make sure. If you are still stuck, please send us
|
|
the usual information (*note Help::)
|
|
|
|
5.5 What to do if you have other problems?
|
|
==========================================
|
|
|
|
Again, send the output listed above.
|
|
|
|
5.6 What if it just works like a charm?
|
|
=======================================
|
|
|
|
Drop us a mail if you feel like it, mentioning the mainboard and
|
|
detected chip type. That way, we have some positive feedback, too!
|
|
|
|
5.7 How do I update a ticket?
|
|
=============================
|
|
|
|
You can't. Only developers can. Follow up by emailing us at
|
|
<sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com> and reference your ticket number in the
|
|
subject. Please don't enter a new ticket with follow-up information,
|
|
email us instead. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
5.8 How do I follow up on a ticket?
|
|
===================================
|
|
|
|
Follow up by emailing us at <sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com> and
|
|
reference your ticket number in the subject.
|
|
|
|
6 How to Contribute
|
|
*******************
|
|
|
|
6.1 How to write a driver
|
|
=========================
|
|
|
|
See `doc/developers/new_drivers' in our package for instructions.
|
|
|
|
6.2 How to get CVS access
|
|
=========================
|
|
|
|
For anonymous CVS read access, see the instructions on our download
|
|
page. Sorry, we don't have automatically generated CVS tarballs.
|
|
|
|
For write access, run the script `doc/developers/genpasswd.pl' in
|
|
our package and follow the instructions. Let us know what part of the
|
|
package you would like to work on.
|
|
|
|
6.3 How to donate hardware to the project
|
|
=========================================
|
|
|
|
Send us email <sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com>.
|
|
|
|
6.4 How to join the project mailing list
|
|
========================================
|
|
|
|
Send us email <sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com>. Sorry, there is no
|
|
automated subscribe/unsubscribe service yet (but we're seriously
|
|
thinking of switching to majordomo). Please note that you do NOT need
|
|
to be subscribed to the list in order to post. If you simply need help
|
|
as a user, post your detailed problem and questions directly. Don't
|
|
worry, you'll be CC'd on all replies.
|
|
|
|
6.5 How to access mailing list archives
|
|
=======================================
|
|
|
|
The mailing list archive is at:
|
|
`http://archives.andrew.net.au/lm-sensors' Sorry, it only contains
|
|
messages since October 28, 2001.
|
|
|
|
6.6 How to submit a patch
|
|
=========================
|
|
|
|
Check out the latest from CVS, then copy the directory to another
|
|
directory, and make your changes. Generate the diff with `diff -u2 -r
|
|
DIR1 DIR2'. Or you can generate the diff in CVS with `cvs diff -u2'.
|
|
Send us the patch in an email and tell us what it does.
|
|
|
|
6.7 How to REALLY help
|
|
======================
|
|
|
|
Believe it or not, what we really need help with are:
|
|
* Answering email
|
|
|
|
* Answering support tickets
|
|
|
|
* Submitting patches to Linus, etc.
|
|
|
|
* Creating a sensors.conf database
|
|
|
|
* Creating RPM's
|
|
|
|
Send us email <sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com> if you can help. No
|
|
experience necessary :)
|
|
|
|
6.8 How to get release announcements
|
|
====================================
|
|
|
|
We don't have a separate release announcement mailing list; however, we
|
|
put all our releases on freshmeat: `http://freshmeat.net' and you can
|
|
register on our freshmeat project page
|
|
`http://freshmeat.net/projects/lm_sensors' to 'subscribe to new
|
|
releases' and then freshmeat will email you announcement.
|
|
|
|
6.9 How to block spam on the project mailing list
|
|
=================================================
|
|
|
|
Sorry, we know the spam is a hassle. It would be nice to have a
|
|
moderator who can screen everything, but that takes too much time and
|
|
delays emails. Right now there is a procmail script which tags likely
|
|
spam and puts in a X-SBClass: header. If it is followed by 'Spam', then
|
|
it is almost certainly spam, if it is followed by 'Blocked', then it
|
|
scores high as being potential spam. You should be able to set some
|
|
rules in your mail client to throw those emails into a seperate folder.
|
|
It's not bullet proof (some legit mails get tagged wrong, and vice
|
|
versa), but it seems to be about 95% accurate in our experience.
|
|
|
|
7 Version 1 Specific Questions
|
|
******************************
|
|
|
|
Note: Version 1 is very very old and is not recommended.
|
|
|
|
7.1 My manufacturer swears that my mainboard has an SMBus, but your code reports that it can't find it. What's wrong?
|
|
======================================================================================================================
|
|
|
|
Currently, our code only assumes that an SMBus exists if it originates
|
|
from the Intel PIIX4 (82371AB). If your computer doesn't have one, or
|
|
if your SMBus originates from a different SMBus 'host', then you are
|
|
out of luck. :'( Our experience is, though, that most machines have a
|
|
PIIX4, and that it is where the SMBus is hosted.
|
|
|
|
Regarding the VIA chip set(s):
|
|
|
|
Right now, the SMBus code depends on the Intel PIIX4 chip to handle
|
|
SMBus transactions. The VIA chip set is NOT supported at this time
|
|
because it forces much of the SMBus protocol to be implemented by
|
|
software.
|
|
|
|
To implement the SMBus correctly with the VIA chip, it needs to be
|
|
written at a low level to be quick. A more attractive alternative is to
|
|
use the Bios SMBus interface (not always available nor standard).
|
|
|
|
Version 2 supports the VIA chipset, and will support other chipsets.
|
|
Version 1 never will.
|
|
|
|
7.2 The modules won't load, saying 'SMBus not detected'.
|
|
========================================================
|
|
|
|
This should no longer be an issue in 1.4.10 and later; it will continue
|
|
loading, but it won't support SMBus-connected devices, of course.
|
|
|
|
7.3 I try to read `/proc/sensors', and I get a "No sensor data yet (try again in a few moments)" message. Why?
|
|
==============================================================================================================
|
|
|
|
It takes about 1.5 seconds for the LM78 to update all its sensor
|
|
values. If we would try to read it before it finished that, you would
|
|
get old garbage instead. So you have to wait 1.5 seconds after the
|
|
module is inserted before you can access `/proc/sensors'.
|
|
|
|
Module versions 1.3.7 and later let the process sleep if it tries to
|
|
access sensor data right after insertion time, and do not display this
|
|
message anymore.
|
|
|
|
7.4 On my Dell, a LM80 is detected, but all readings are 0!
|
|
===========================================================
|
|
|
|
This is a bug we have only observed on Dell computers. There is
|
|
probably a problem with the way the SMBus is accessed; but it is not yet
|
|
clear whether the problem is in our code or with the Dells.
|
|
|
|
There are very probably no sensor chips at all on your computer; but
|
|
until somebody contacts Dell about this and tells us the results, we
|
|
can not be sure.
|
|
|
|
Appendix A Revision History of This Document
|
|
********************************************
|
|
|
|
* Rev 2.10 (MDS) Various updates, 20040103
|
|
|
|
* Rev 2.9 (CP) Converted to Gnu texinfo format, 20020910
|
|
|
|
* Rev 2.8 (MDS) Minor updates 20020710, released with lm_sensors
|
|
2.6.4
|
|
|
|
* Rev 2.7 (MDS) Minor updates 20020425
|
|
|
|
* Rev 2.6 (MDS) Minor updates 20020115, released with lm_sensors
|
|
2.6.3
|
|
|
|
* Rev 2.5 (MDS) Minor updates 20011111, released with lm_sensors
|
|
2.6.2
|
|
|
|
* Rev 2.4 (MDS) Minor updates 20010722
|
|
|
|
* Rev 2.3 (MDS) General update, 20010224, released with lm_sensors
|
|
2.6.0.
|
|
|
|
* Rev 2.2 (Frodo) Corrections for lm_sensors 2.4, 19990920
|
|
|
|
* Rev 2.1 (Frodo) Corrections for lm_sensors 2.2, 19990112
|
|
|
|
* Rev 2.0 (Frodo) Major revision for lm_sensors 2.1, 19981229
|
|
|
|
* Rev 1.10 (Frodo) Modified 3.8, updated some other things, 19980924
|
|
|
|
* Rev 1.9 (Frodo) Added 3.15, 19980906
|
|
|
|
* Rev 1.8 (Frodo) Added 3.14, 19980905
|
|
|
|
* Rev 1.7 (Phil) Added 3.13 and some other minor changes, 19980901
|
|
|
|
* Rev 1.6 (Frodo) Added 4, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 19980901
|
|
|
|
* Rev 1.5 (Frodo) Added 2.3, 2.4, 3.9, 3.10, 3.11, 19980826
|
|
|
|
* Rev 1.4 (Frodo) Added some more Winbond information, and 3.5-3.8,
|
|
19980817
|
|
|
|
* Rev 1.3 Added info on the Winbond chip, 19980816
|
|
|
|
* Rev 1.2 Adapation by Frodo Looijaard, 19980810
|
|
|
|
* Rev 1.1 Modifications by Philip Edelbrock, 19980809
|
|
|
|
* Rev 1.0 Written by Philip Edelbrock, 19980803
|
|
|