mirror of
https://github.com/vdukhovni/postfix
synced 2025-08-31 22:25:24 +00:00
postfix-2.6.4-RC1
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Viktor Dukhovni
parent
3471537651
commit
a6af126373
@@ -15269,3 +15269,14 @@ Apologies for any names omitted.
|
||||
Documentation: as of Postfix 2.6, the reject_unauth_pipelining
|
||||
feature can be used meaningfully at any protocol stage.
|
||||
File: proto/postconf.proto.
|
||||
|
||||
20090803
|
||||
|
||||
Workaround: with some local DNS servers including BIND, it
|
||||
is possible that A or MX lookups succeed, while NS lookups
|
||||
for the same domains time out. Spammers use this to avoid
|
||||
access restrictions. To deal with future variations of
|
||||
this, check_{client,helo,sender,etc}_{mx,ns,etc}_access no
|
||||
longer tolerate any lookup failures. Instead, they reply
|
||||
with $access_map_defer_code or $access_map_reject_code as
|
||||
appropriate. File: smtpd/smtpd_check.c.
|
||||
|
@@ -14,6 +14,22 @@ specifies the release date of a stable release or snapshot release.
|
||||
If you upgrade from Postfix 2.4 or earlier, read RELEASE_NOTES-2.5
|
||||
before proceeding.
|
||||
|
||||
Incompatibility with Postfix 2.6.4
|
||||
==================================
|
||||
|
||||
The check_{client,helo,sender,etc}_{mx,ns,etc}_access features no
|
||||
longer tolerate any lookup failures. Instead, they now reply with
|
||||
$access_map_defer_code or $access_map_reject_code as appropriate.
|
||||
|
||||
The reason for this change is that spammers are using tricks where
|
||||
A or MX lookups succeed while NS lookups for the same domains fail,
|
||||
depending local DNS infrastructure details. The change deals with
|
||||
future variants of this anomalous behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
As a side effect, non-existent domain names in HELO commands will
|
||||
now trigger a REJECT action with check_helo_{mx,ns}_access, where
|
||||
previously such commands were silently permitted.
|
||||
|
||||
Major changes - multi-instance support
|
||||
--------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@
|
||||
* Patches change both the patchlevel and the release date. Snapshots have no
|
||||
* patchlevel; they change the release date only.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define MAIL_RELEASE_DATE "20090802"
|
||||
#define MAIL_VERSION_NUMBER "2.6.3"
|
||||
#define MAIL_RELEASE_DATE "20090803"
|
||||
#define MAIL_VERSION_NUMBER "2.6.4-RC1"
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef SNAPSHOT
|
||||
# define MAIL_VERSION_DATE "-" MAIL_RELEASE_DATE
|
||||
|
@@ -2575,7 +2575,14 @@ static int check_server_access(SMTPD_STATE *state, const char *table,
|
||||
if (dns_status != DNS_OK) {
|
||||
msg_warn("Unable to look up %s host for %s: %s", dns_strtype(type),
|
||||
domain && domain[1] ? domain : name, dns_strerror(h_errno));
|
||||
return (SMTPD_CHECK_DUNNO);
|
||||
/* No mercy for DNS failure. */
|
||||
return (smtpd_check_reject(state, MAIL_ERROR_POLICY,
|
||||
dns_status == DNS_NOTFOUND ?
|
||||
var_map_reject_code : var_map_defer_code,
|
||||
smtpd_dsn_fix("4.1.8", reply_class),
|
||||
"<%s>: %s rejected: %s",
|
||||
reply_name, reply_class,
|
||||
"Domain not found"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@@ -2600,7 +2607,16 @@ static int check_server_access(SMTPD_STATE *state, const char *table,
|
||||
msg_warn("Unable to look up %s host %s for %s %s: %s",
|
||||
dns_strtype(type), (char *) server->data,
|
||||
reply_class, reply_name, MAI_STRERROR(aierr));
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
/* No mercy for DNS failure. */
|
||||
status = smtpd_check_reject(state,
|
||||
MAIL_ERROR_POLICY,
|
||||
aierr == EAI_NONAME ?
|
||||
var_map_reject_code : var_map_defer_code,
|
||||
smtpd_dsn_fix("4.1.8", reply_class),
|
||||
"<%s>: %s rejected: %s",
|
||||
reply_name, reply_class,
|
||||
"Domain not found");
|
||||
CHECK_SERVER_RETURN(status);
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* Now we must also free the addrinfo result. */
|
||||
if (msg_verbose)
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user