mirror of
https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9
synced 2025-08-31 06:25:31 +00:00
Remove obsolete RFCs from documentation
There is little point of listing all of the obsolete RFCs. I think it is more likely confuse people than to do anything useful.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -402,83 +402,6 @@ RFCs of Type "Unknown"
|
||||
:rfc:`1101` - P. Mockapetris. *DNS Encoding of Network Names and Other Types.*
|
||||
April 1989.
|
||||
|
||||
Obsoleted and Unimplemented Experimental RFCs
|
||||
---------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`1521` - N. Borenstein and N. Freed. *MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail
|
||||
Extensions) Part One: Mechanisms for Specifying and Describing the Format of
|
||||
Internet Message Bodies.* September 1993 [#rfc1521]_
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`1750` - D. Eastlake, 3rd, S. Crocker, and J. Schiller. *Randomness
|
||||
Recommendations for Security.* December 1994.
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`2535` - D. Eastlake, 3rd. *Domain Name System Security Extensions.*
|
||||
March 1999. [#rfc2535_1]_ [#rfc2535_2]_
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`2537` - D. Eastlake, 3rd. *RSA/MD5 KEYs and SIGs in the Domain Name System
|
||||
(DNS).* March 1999.
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`2538` - D. Eastlake, 3rd and O. Gudmundsson. *Storing Certificates in the Domain
|
||||
Name System (DNS).* March 1999.
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`2671` - P. Vixie. *Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS0).* August 1999.
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`2672` - M. Crawford. *Non-Terminal DNS Name Redirection.* August 1999.
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`2673` - M. Crawford. *Binary Labels in the Domain Name System.* August 1999.
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`2915` - M. Mealling and R. Daniel. *The Naming Authority Pointer (NAPTR) DNS
|
||||
Resource Record.* September 2000.
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`3008` - B. Wellington. *Domain Name System Security (DNSSEC) Signing
|
||||
Authority.* November 2000.
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`3152` - R. Bush. *Delegation of IP6.ARPA.* August 2001.
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`3445` - D. Massey and S. Rose. *Limiting the Scope of the KEY Resource Record
|
||||
(RR).* December 2002.
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`3490` - P. Faltstrom, P. Hoffman, and A. Costello. *Internationalizing Domain Names
|
||||
in Applications (IDNA).* March 2003. [#idna]
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`3491` - P. Hoffman and M. Blanchet. *Nameprep: A Stringprep Profile for
|
||||
Internationalized Domain Names (IDN).* March 2003. [#idna]
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`3655` - B. Wellington and O. Gudmundsson. *Redefinition of DNS Authenticated
|
||||
Data (AD) Bit.* November 2003.
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`3658` - O. Gudmundsson. *Delegation Signer (DS) Resource Record (RR).*
|
||||
December 2003.
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`3755` - S. Weiler. *Legacy Resolver Compatibility for Delegation Signer
|
||||
(DS).* May 2004.
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`3757` - O. Kolkman, J. Schlyter, and E. Lewis. *Domain Name System KEY (DNSKEY)
|
||||
Resource Record (RR) Secure Entry Point (SEP) Flag.* May 2004.
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`3845` - J. Schlyter. *DNS Security (DNSSEC) NextSECure (NSEC) RDATA Format.*
|
||||
August 2004.
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`4294` - J. Loughney, Ed. *IPv6 Node Requirements.* [#rfc4294]_
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`4408` - M. Wong and W. Schlitt. *Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for
|
||||
Authorizing Use of Domains in E-Mail, Version 1.* April 2006.
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`5966` - R. Bellis. *DNS Transport Over TCP - Implementation
|
||||
Requirements.* August 2010.
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`6844` - P. Hallam-Baker and R. Stradling. *DNS Certification Authority
|
||||
Authorization (CAA) Resource Record.* January 2013.
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`6944` - S. Rose. *Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY
|
||||
Algorithm Implementation Status.* April 2013.
|
||||
|
||||
RFCs No Longer Supported in BIND 9
|
||||
----------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
:rfc:`2536` - D. Eastlake, 3rd. *DSA KEYs and SIGs in the Domain Name System
|
||||
(DNS).* March 1999.
|
||||
|
||||
Notes
|
||||
~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -532,13 +455,6 @@ Notes
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#rfc1521] Only the Base 64 encoding specification is supported.
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#rfc2535_1] Wildcard records are not supported in DNSSEC secure zones.
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#rfc2535_2] Servers authoritative for secure zones being resolved by BIND
|
||||
9 must support EDNS0 (:rfc:`2671`), and must return all relevant SIGs
|
||||
and NXTs in responses, rather than relying on the resolving server
|
||||
to perform separate queries for missing SIGs and NXTs.
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#idna] BIND 9 requires ``--with-libidn2`` to enable entry of IDN labels within
|
||||
dig, host, and nslookup at compile time. ACE labels are supported
|
||||
everywhere with or without ``--with-libidn2``.
|
||||
|
@@ -50,8 +50,6 @@ or Best Current Practice (BCP) documents. The list is non exhaustive.
|
||||
RFC3225
|
||||
RFC3226
|
||||
RFC3363 [6]
|
||||
RFC3490 [7]
|
||||
RFC3491 (Obsoleted by 5890, 5891) [7]
|
||||
RFC3493
|
||||
RFC3496
|
||||
RFC3597
|
||||
@@ -109,41 +107,12 @@ or Best Current Practice (BCP) documents. The list is non exhaustive.
|
||||
RFC8659
|
||||
RFC8880
|
||||
|
||||
No longer supported
|
||||
|
||||
RFC2536
|
||||
|
||||
The following DNS related RFC have been obsoleted
|
||||
|
||||
RFC2535 (Obsoleted by 4034, 4035) [3] [4]
|
||||
RFC2537 (Obsoleted by 3110) [19]
|
||||
RFC2538 (Obsoleted by 4398)
|
||||
RFC2671 (Obsoleted by 6891)
|
||||
RFC2672 (Obsoleted by 6672)
|
||||
RFC2673 (Obsoleted by 6891)
|
||||
RFC3008 (Obsoleted by 4034, 4035)
|
||||
RFC3152 (Obsoleted by 3596)
|
||||
RFC3445 (Obsoleted by 4034, 4035)
|
||||
RFC3655 (Obsoleted by 4034, 4035)
|
||||
RFC3658 (Obsoleted by 4034, 4035)
|
||||
RFC3755 (Obsoleted by 4034, 4035)
|
||||
RFC3757 (Obsoleted by 4034, 4035)
|
||||
RFC3845 (Obsoleted by 4034, 4035)
|
||||
RFC6844 (Obsoleted by 8659)
|
||||
|
||||
[1] Queries to zones that have failed to load return SERVFAIL rather
|
||||
than a non-authoritative response. This is considered a feature.
|
||||
|
||||
[2] CLASS ANY queries are not supported. This is considered a
|
||||
feature.
|
||||
|
||||
[3] Wildcard records are not supported in DNSSEC secure zones.
|
||||
|
||||
[4] Servers authoritative for secure zones being resolved by BIND
|
||||
9 must support EDNS0 (RFC2671), and must return all relevant SIGs
|
||||
and NXTs in responses rather than relying on the resolving server
|
||||
to perform separate queries for missing SIGs and NXTs.
|
||||
|
||||
[5] When receiving a query signed with a SIG(0), the server will
|
||||
only be able to verify the signature if it has the key in its local
|
||||
authoritative data; it will not do recursion or validation to
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user