updates

dnsop-document-status.txt

@@ -1,7 +1,10 @@
 # DNSOP Chairs Status
-#### Updated: 17 July 2018
+### Updated: 25 July 2018
 
 Official document list: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/documents/
+This Document: https://github.com/DNSOP/wg-materials/blob/master/dnsop-document-status.txt
+
+Questions, Concerns, etc:  dnsop-chairs at ietf.org 
 
 ## IESG Queue
 
@@ -11,25 +14,27 @@ Official document list: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/documents/
 
 * draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns 
 
+* draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel
+
+* draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis
+
+* draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
+
+* draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix
+
 ## Limbo
 
 * draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld 
     - Held by WG. 
     - Pending guidance from the IESG/IAB
 
+* draft-song-dns-wireformat-http
+    - Parked
+
 ## WG Chairs Work
 
-* draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel
-    - awaiting write up
-
-* draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis
-    - awaiting write-up
-
-* draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf  
-    - awaiting write up
-    
-* draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix
-    - awaiting write up
+* draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format
+    - Revision to address version numbers and math
 
 ## In WG Last Call
 
@@ -37,9 +42,6 @@ Official document list: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/documents/
     - WGLC Ends 20 Friday 2018
     - Consensus is extremely rough 
     
-* draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format 
-    - WGLC Ends 20 Friday 2018
-
 * draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost 
     - Waiting on Authors since 2018-02-19
 
@@ -53,22 +55,18 @@ Official document list: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/documents/
     
 ## Adopted
 
-* draft-ietf-dnsop-aname
-    - Authors getting editing help
-
 * draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale
     - May be too contentious
 
 * draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements
     - Section 4 and 5.3 TODOs, John and Duane are working on
-
-* draft-song-dns-wireformat-http
-    - Needs to be updated to reflect DOH
     
 * draft-huque-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec
 
 ## Expired Adopted Documents
 
+* draft-ietf-dnsop-aname
+
 * draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error 
     - Last list discussion was 2017-11-07
 
@@ -77,19 +75,20 @@ Official document list: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/documents/
 
 ## Call for Adoption
 
+* draft-bortzmeyer-rfc7816bis
+
+* draft-kh-dnsop-7706bis
 
 ## Candidates For Adoption
 
-* draft-bortzmeyer-rfc7816bis
-
 * draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes
+
 * draft-wessels-dns-zone-digest
-* draft-kh-dnsop-7706bis
+
 * draft-song-atr-large-resp
 
 ## Documents Worth Considering
 
-
 * draft-jabley-dnsop-bootstrap-validator
     - Signs point to yes
 
@@ -102,11 +101,9 @@ Official document list: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/documents/
 
 * draft-spacek-edns-camel-diet
 
-
 ## New Documents 
 
 
-
 ## Needs more Review
 
 ## Not At This Time 
@@ -114,11 +111,6 @@ Official document list: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/documents/
 * draft-muks-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones 
     - considered but WG passed on
 
-* draft-bellis-dnsop-xpf
-    - No significant interest 
-
-* draft-gavrichenkov-dnsop-dnssapi
-
 * draft-tariq-dnsop-iviptr
 
 

dnsop-ietf102/dnsop-ietf102-minutes-1.txt

@@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ Wes: Wants more feedback about what should go into the document
 How complex should the signaling be?
 Giovane Moura: Should go to see presentation in MAPRG tomorrow 
 
+### Chairs Action:  Needs More Review
 -------
 [[ Day 2 starts here ]]
 
@@ -255,7 +256,8 @@ Peter van Dijk: ATR changes a best case from 2 packets into 5 packets
 APNIC research is useless
 We are making amplification attacks worse
 We have no intent to implement and is against adoption
-## Chairs Action: Some interest but not enough for adoption at this time 
+
+### Chairs Action: Some interest but not enough for adoption at this time
 
 draft-tariq-dnsop-iviptr, Tariq Saraj
 Mark: Zero interest in implementing with this
@@ -264,7 +266,8 @@ Doesn't think enough people will use these records
 Ondřej: This is about IDR
 Pushing provisioning problems into the DNS
 Should not be implemented
-## Chairs Action: No Interest 
+
+### Chairs Action: No Interest 
 
 draft-wessels-dns-zone-digest, Wes Hardaker
 George: Remove "Merkle trees"
@@ -289,8 +292,27 @@ Wes: Yes
 Mark: It is possible to do something similar: hash just the delegation points
 Will work with dynamic updates
 Also can loose RRSIGs
-## Chairs Action: Interest in continuing, multiple implementations. 
+
+### Chairs Action: Interest in continuing, multiple implementations. 
 
 draft-kh-dnsop-7706bis, Paul Hoffman-Kumari
+Geoff: Imagine I'm on a server on a host, I'm multi-homed, and forwards from IP to the other. Am I breaking the rules?
+Paul:  Question for the doc.
+Geoff: What if I have 3 IPs?  You're trying to constrain the moment.  You can't apply constraint. 
+Paul: We should discuss this in the document. 
+Shane: Aggressive NSEC now published, should reduce temptation...
+Paul: Why?
+Shane: All cache misses will be handled Locally...
+Paul:  One reason of 7706 is to preserve privacy. If you pull the root and pre-loading, nothing leaks.
+Shane: Will send text on performance
+Andrew: If people do weird things, no protocol police...
+Paul: Fairies but not police
+Wes: IETF document what people do on the internet. We should adopt
+Ray: Don't care on restrictions, local mirror of root zone is more important. 
+Ondrej: Feel more Strongly than Ray and Andrew, don't understand why its wrong. 
+Peter (via Dan): All Major Resolvers decided not to 7706 directly, so update is necessary. adopt 
+Lars: Can change the keys. 
 
-## Chairs Action: Sounds like Interest in Contuining 
+### Chairs Action: Interest in adoption
+
+### Chairs Action: Sounds like Interest in Contuining