mirror of
https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs
synced 2025-10-25 15:07:05 +00:00
ofp-util: Improve comments on struct ofputil_packet_in.
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <blp@nicira.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -376,17 +376,33 @@ struct ofpbuf *ofputil_encode_flow_removed(const struct ofputil_flow_removed *,
|
||||
|
||||
/* Abstract packet-in message. */
|
||||
struct ofputil_packet_in {
|
||||
/* Packet data and metadata.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* To save bandwidth, in some cases a switch may send only the first
|
||||
* several bytes of a packet, indicated by 'packet_len < total_len'. When
|
||||
* the full packet is included, 'packet_len == total_len'. */
|
||||
const void *packet;
|
||||
size_t packet_len;
|
||||
|
||||
enum ofp_packet_in_reason reason; /* One of OFPR_*. */
|
||||
uint8_t table_id;
|
||||
ovs_be64 cookie;
|
||||
size_t packet_len; /* Number of bytes in 'packet'. */
|
||||
size_t total_len; /* Size of packet, pre-truncation. */
|
||||
struct flow_metadata fmd;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Identifies a buffer in the switch that contains the full packet, to
|
||||
* allow the controller to reference it later without having to send the
|
||||
* entire packet back to the switch.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* UINT32_MAX indicates that the packet is not buffered in the switch. A
|
||||
* switch should only use UINT32_MAX when it sends the entire packet. */
|
||||
uint32_t buffer_id;
|
||||
uint16_t total_len; /* Full length of frame. */
|
||||
|
||||
struct flow_metadata fmd; /* Metadata at creation time. */
|
||||
/* Reason that the packet-in is being sent. */
|
||||
enum ofp_packet_in_reason reason; /* One of OFPR_*. */
|
||||
|
||||
/* Information about the OpenFlow flow that triggered the packet-in.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* A packet-in triggered by a flow table miss has no associated flow. In
|
||||
* that case, 'cookie' is 0. */
|
||||
uint8_t table_id; /* OpenFlow table ID. */
|
||||
ovs_be64 cookie; /* Flow's cookie. */
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
enum ofperr ofputil_decode_packet_in(struct ofputil_packet_in *,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user