mirror of
https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs
synced 2025-08-30 13:58:14 +00:00
dpif/dpcls: limit count subtable search info logs
This commit avoids many instances of "using subtable X for miniflow (x,y)" in the ovs-vswitchd log when using the DPCLS Autovalidator. This occurs when no specialized subtable is found, and the generic "_any" version of the avx512 subtable search implementation was used. This change logs the subtable usage once, avoiding duplicates. Signed-off-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com> Signed-off-by: kumar Amber <kumar.amber@intel.com> Co-authored-by: kumar Amber <kumar.amber@intel.com> Acked-by: Flavio Leitner <fbl@sysclose.org> Signed-off-by: Ian Stokes <ian.stokes@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Ian Stokes
parent
26fbd1a1be
commit
a72c1dfbd5
@@ -182,6 +182,40 @@ chosen, and the 2nd occurance of that priority is not used. Put in logical
|
||||
terms, a subtable is chosen if its priority is greater than the previous
|
||||
best candidate.
|
||||
|
||||
Optimizing Specific Subtable Search
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
During the packet classification, the datapath can use specialized
|
||||
lookup tables to optimize the search. However, not all situations
|
||||
are optimized. If you see a message like the following one in the OVS
|
||||
logs, it means that there is no specialized implementation available
|
||||
for the current networking traffic. In this case, OVS will continue
|
||||
to process the traffic normally using a more generic lookup table."
|
||||
|
||||
"Using non-specialized AVX512 lookup for subtable (4,1) and possibly others."
|
||||
|
||||
(Note that the numbers 4 and 1 will likely be different in your logs)
|
||||
|
||||
Additional specialized lookups can be added to OVS if the user
|
||||
provides that log message along with the command output as show
|
||||
below to the OVS mailing list. Note that the numbers in the log
|
||||
message ("subtable (X,Y)") need to match with the numbers in
|
||||
the provided command output ("dp-extra-info:miniflow_bits(X,Y)").
|
||||
|
||||
"ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-flows -m", which results in output like this:
|
||||
|
||||
ufid:82770b5d-ca38-44ff-8283-74ba36bd1ca5, skb_priority(0/0),skb_mark(0/0)
|
||||
,ct_state(0/0),ct_zone(0/0),ct_mark(0/0),ct_label(0/0),recirc_id(0),
|
||||
dp_hash(0/0),in_port(pcap0),packet_type(ns=0,id=0),eth(src=00:00:00:00:00:
|
||||
00/00:00:00:00:00:00,dst=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff/00:00:00:00:00:00),eth_type(
|
||||
0x8100),vlan(vid=1,pcp=0),encap(eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=127.0.0.1/0.0.0.0
|
||||
,dst=127.0.0.1/0.0.0.0,proto=17/0,tos=0/0,ttl=64/0,frag=no),udp(src=53/0,
|
||||
dst=53/0)), packets:77072681, bytes:3545343326, used:0.000s, dp:ovs,
|
||||
actions:vhostuserclient0, dp-extra-info:miniflow_bits(4,1)
|
||||
|
||||
Please send an email to the OVS mailing list ovs-dev@openvswitch.org with
|
||||
the output of the "dp-extra-info:miniflow_bits(4,1)" values.
|
||||
|
||||
CPU ISA Testing and Validation
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
|
@@ -411,8 +411,8 @@ dpcls_subtable_avx512_gather_probe(uint32_t u0_bits, uint32_t u1_bits)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!f && (u0_bits + u1_bits) < (NUM_U64_IN_ZMM_REG * 2)) {
|
||||
f = dpcls_avx512_gather_mf_any;
|
||||
VLOG_INFO("Using avx512_gather_mf_any for subtable (%d,%d)\n",
|
||||
u0_bits, u1_bits);
|
||||
VLOG_INFO_ONCE("Using non-specialized AVX512 lookup for subtable"
|
||||
" (%d,%d) and possibly others.", u0_bits, u1_bits);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return f;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user